Cargando…

Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks

The development of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has recently led to great successes in computer vision, and CNNs have become de facto computational models of vision. However, a growing body of work suggests that they exhibit critical limitations on tasks beyond image categorization. Her...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alamia, Andrea, Luo, Canhuang, Ricci, Matthew, Kim, Junkyung, Serre, Thomas, VanRullen, Rufin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-20.2020
_version_ 1783650175997181952
author Alamia, Andrea
Luo, Canhuang
Ricci, Matthew
Kim, Junkyung
Serre, Thomas
VanRullen, Rufin
author_facet Alamia, Andrea
Luo, Canhuang
Ricci, Matthew
Kim, Junkyung
Serre, Thomas
VanRullen, Rufin
author_sort Alamia, Andrea
collection PubMed
description The development of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has recently led to great successes in computer vision, and CNNs have become de facto computational models of vision. However, a growing body of work suggests that they exhibit critical limitations on tasks beyond image categorization. Here, we study one such fundamental limitation, concerning the judgment of whether two simultaneously presented items are the same or different (SD) compared with a baseline assessment of their spatial relationship (SR). In both human subjects and artificial neural networks, we test the prediction that SD tasks recruit additional cortical mechanisms which underlie critical aspects of visual cognition that are not explained by current computational models. We thus recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals from human participants engaged in the same tasks as the computational models. Importantly, in humans the two tasks were matched in terms of difficulty by an adaptive psychometric procedure; yet, on top of a modulation of evoked potentials (EPs), our results revealed higher activity in the low β (16–24 Hz) band in the SD compared with the SR conditions. We surmise that these oscillations reflect the crucial involvement of additional mechanisms, such as working memory and attention, which are missing in current feed-forward CNNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78774742021-02-12 Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks Alamia, Andrea Luo, Canhuang Ricci, Matthew Kim, Junkyung Serre, Thomas VanRullen, Rufin eNeuro Research Article: New Research The development of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has recently led to great successes in computer vision, and CNNs have become de facto computational models of vision. However, a growing body of work suggests that they exhibit critical limitations on tasks beyond image categorization. Here, we study one such fundamental limitation, concerning the judgment of whether two simultaneously presented items are the same or different (SD) compared with a baseline assessment of their spatial relationship (SR). In both human subjects and artificial neural networks, we test the prediction that SD tasks recruit additional cortical mechanisms which underlie critical aspects of visual cognition that are not explained by current computational models. We thus recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals from human participants engaged in the same tasks as the computational models. Importantly, in humans the two tasks were matched in terms of difficulty by an adaptive psychometric procedure; yet, on top of a modulation of evoked potentials (EPs), our results revealed higher activity in the low β (16–24 Hz) band in the SD compared with the SR conditions. We surmise that these oscillations reflect the crucial involvement of additional mechanisms, such as working memory and attention, which are missing in current feed-forward CNNs. Society for Neuroscience 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7877474/ /pubmed/33239271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-20.2020 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alamia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article: New Research
Alamia, Andrea
Luo, Canhuang
Ricci, Matthew
Kim, Junkyung
Serre, Thomas
VanRullen, Rufin
Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
title Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
title_full Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
title_fullStr Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
title_short Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
title_sort differential involvement of eeg oscillatory components in sameness versus spatial-relation visual reasoning tasks
topic Research Article: New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-20.2020
work_keys_str_mv AT alamiaandrea differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks
AT luocanhuang differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks
AT riccimatthew differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks
AT kimjunkyung differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks
AT serrethomas differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks
AT vanrullenrufin differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks