Cargando…
Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks
The development of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has recently led to great successes in computer vision, and CNNs have become de facto computational models of vision. However, a growing body of work suggests that they exhibit critical limitations on tasks beyond image categorization. Her...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society for Neuroscience
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-20.2020 |
_version_ | 1783650175997181952 |
---|---|
author | Alamia, Andrea Luo, Canhuang Ricci, Matthew Kim, Junkyung Serre, Thomas VanRullen, Rufin |
author_facet | Alamia, Andrea Luo, Canhuang Ricci, Matthew Kim, Junkyung Serre, Thomas VanRullen, Rufin |
author_sort | Alamia, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has recently led to great successes in computer vision, and CNNs have become de facto computational models of vision. However, a growing body of work suggests that they exhibit critical limitations on tasks beyond image categorization. Here, we study one such fundamental limitation, concerning the judgment of whether two simultaneously presented items are the same or different (SD) compared with a baseline assessment of their spatial relationship (SR). In both human subjects and artificial neural networks, we test the prediction that SD tasks recruit additional cortical mechanisms which underlie critical aspects of visual cognition that are not explained by current computational models. We thus recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals from human participants engaged in the same tasks as the computational models. Importantly, in humans the two tasks were matched in terms of difficulty by an adaptive psychometric procedure; yet, on top of a modulation of evoked potentials (EPs), our results revealed higher activity in the low β (16–24 Hz) band in the SD compared with the SR conditions. We surmise that these oscillations reflect the crucial involvement of additional mechanisms, such as working memory and attention, which are missing in current feed-forward CNNs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7877474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society for Neuroscience |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78774742021-02-12 Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks Alamia, Andrea Luo, Canhuang Ricci, Matthew Kim, Junkyung Serre, Thomas VanRullen, Rufin eNeuro Research Article: New Research The development of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has recently led to great successes in computer vision, and CNNs have become de facto computational models of vision. However, a growing body of work suggests that they exhibit critical limitations on tasks beyond image categorization. Here, we study one such fundamental limitation, concerning the judgment of whether two simultaneously presented items are the same or different (SD) compared with a baseline assessment of their spatial relationship (SR). In both human subjects and artificial neural networks, we test the prediction that SD tasks recruit additional cortical mechanisms which underlie critical aspects of visual cognition that are not explained by current computational models. We thus recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals from human participants engaged in the same tasks as the computational models. Importantly, in humans the two tasks were matched in terms of difficulty by an adaptive psychometric procedure; yet, on top of a modulation of evoked potentials (EPs), our results revealed higher activity in the low β (16–24 Hz) band in the SD compared with the SR conditions. We surmise that these oscillations reflect the crucial involvement of additional mechanisms, such as working memory and attention, which are missing in current feed-forward CNNs. Society for Neuroscience 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7877474/ /pubmed/33239271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-20.2020 Text en Copyright © 2021 Alamia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article: New Research Alamia, Andrea Luo, Canhuang Ricci, Matthew Kim, Junkyung Serre, Thomas VanRullen, Rufin Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks |
title | Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks |
title_full | Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks |
title_fullStr | Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks |
title_short | Differential Involvement of EEG Oscillatory Components in Sameness versus Spatial-Relation Visual Reasoning Tasks |
title_sort | differential involvement of eeg oscillatory components in sameness versus spatial-relation visual reasoning tasks |
topic | Research Article: New Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-20.2020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alamiaandrea differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks AT luocanhuang differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks AT riccimatthew differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks AT kimjunkyung differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks AT serrethomas differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks AT vanrullenrufin differentialinvolvementofeegoscillatorycomponentsinsamenessversusspatialrelationvisualreasoningtasks |