Cargando…
Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
This study reports on the application of a Portfolio Decision Analysis (PDA) to support investment decisions of a non-profit funder of vaccine technology platform development for rapid response to emerging infections. A value framework was constructed via document reviews and stakeholder consultatio...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246235 |
_version_ | 1783650206351360000 |
---|---|
author | Gouglas, Dimitrios Marsh, Kevin |
author_facet | Gouglas, Dimitrios Marsh, Kevin |
author_sort | Gouglas, Dimitrios |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study reports on the application of a Portfolio Decision Analysis (PDA) to support investment decisions of a non-profit funder of vaccine technology platform development for rapid response to emerging infections. A value framework was constructed via document reviews and stakeholder consultations. Probability of Success (PoS) data was obtained for 16 platform projects through expert assessments and stakeholder portfolio preferences via a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The structure of preferences and the uncertainties in project PoS suggested a non-linear, stochastic value maximization problem. A simulation-optimization algorithm was employed, identifying optimal portfolios under different budget constraints. Stochastic dominance of the optimization solution was tested via mean-variance and mean-Gini statistics, and its robustness via rank probability analysis in a Monte Carlo simulation. Project PoS estimates were low and substantially overlapping. The DCE identified decreasing rates of return to investing in single platform types. Optimal portfolio solutions reflected this non-linearity of platform preferences along an efficiency frontier and diverged from a model simply ranking projects by PoS-to-Cost, despite significant revisions to project PoS estimates during the review process in relation to the conduct of the DCE. Large confidence intervals associated with optimization solutions suggested significant uncertainty in portfolio valuations. Mean-variance and Mean-Gini tests suggested optimal portfolios with higher expected values were also accompanied by higher risks of not achieving those values despite stochastic dominance of the optimal portfolio solution under the decision maker’s budget constraint. This portfolio was also the highest ranked portfolio in the simulation; though having only a 54% probability of being preferred to the second-ranked portfolio. The analysis illustrates how optimization modelling can help health R&D decision makers identify optimal portfolios in the face of significant decision uncertainty involving portfolio trade-offs. However, in light of such extreme uncertainty, further due diligence and ongoing updating of performance is needed on highly risky projects as well as data on decision makers’ portfolio risk attitude before PDA can conclude about optimal and robust solutions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7877621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78776212021-02-19 Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis Gouglas, Dimitrios Marsh, Kevin PLoS One Research Article This study reports on the application of a Portfolio Decision Analysis (PDA) to support investment decisions of a non-profit funder of vaccine technology platform development for rapid response to emerging infections. A value framework was constructed via document reviews and stakeholder consultations. Probability of Success (PoS) data was obtained for 16 platform projects through expert assessments and stakeholder portfolio preferences via a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The structure of preferences and the uncertainties in project PoS suggested a non-linear, stochastic value maximization problem. A simulation-optimization algorithm was employed, identifying optimal portfolios under different budget constraints. Stochastic dominance of the optimization solution was tested via mean-variance and mean-Gini statistics, and its robustness via rank probability analysis in a Monte Carlo simulation. Project PoS estimates were low and substantially overlapping. The DCE identified decreasing rates of return to investing in single platform types. Optimal portfolio solutions reflected this non-linearity of platform preferences along an efficiency frontier and diverged from a model simply ranking projects by PoS-to-Cost, despite significant revisions to project PoS estimates during the review process in relation to the conduct of the DCE. Large confidence intervals associated with optimization solutions suggested significant uncertainty in portfolio valuations. Mean-variance and Mean-Gini tests suggested optimal portfolios with higher expected values were also accompanied by higher risks of not achieving those values despite stochastic dominance of the optimal portfolio solution under the decision maker’s budget constraint. This portfolio was also the highest ranked portfolio in the simulation; though having only a 54% probability of being preferred to the second-ranked portfolio. The analysis illustrates how optimization modelling can help health R&D decision makers identify optimal portfolios in the face of significant decision uncertainty involving portfolio trade-offs. However, in light of such extreme uncertainty, further due diligence and ongoing updating of performance is needed on highly risky projects as well as data on decision makers’ portfolio risk attitude before PDA can conclude about optimal and robust solutions. Public Library of Science 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7877621/ /pubmed/33571206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246235 Text en © 2021 Gouglas, Marsh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gouglas, Dimitrios Marsh, Kevin Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis |
title | Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis |
title_full | Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis |
title_fullStr | Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis |
title_short | Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis |
title_sort | prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: a portfolio decision analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gouglasdimitrios prioritizinginvestmentsinrapidresponsevaccinetechnologiesforemerginginfectionsaportfoliodecisionanalysis AT marshkevin prioritizinginvestmentsinrapidresponsevaccinetechnologiesforemerginginfectionsaportfoliodecisionanalysis |