Cargando…

Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis

This study reports on the application of a Portfolio Decision Analysis (PDA) to support investment decisions of a non-profit funder of vaccine technology platform development for rapid response to emerging infections. A value framework was constructed via document reviews and stakeholder consultatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gouglas, Dimitrios, Marsh, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246235
_version_ 1783650206351360000
author Gouglas, Dimitrios
Marsh, Kevin
author_facet Gouglas, Dimitrios
Marsh, Kevin
author_sort Gouglas, Dimitrios
collection PubMed
description This study reports on the application of a Portfolio Decision Analysis (PDA) to support investment decisions of a non-profit funder of vaccine technology platform development for rapid response to emerging infections. A value framework was constructed via document reviews and stakeholder consultations. Probability of Success (PoS) data was obtained for 16 platform projects through expert assessments and stakeholder portfolio preferences via a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The structure of preferences and the uncertainties in project PoS suggested a non-linear, stochastic value maximization problem. A simulation-optimization algorithm was employed, identifying optimal portfolios under different budget constraints. Stochastic dominance of the optimization solution was tested via mean-variance and mean-Gini statistics, and its robustness via rank probability analysis in a Monte Carlo simulation. Project PoS estimates were low and substantially overlapping. The DCE identified decreasing rates of return to investing in single platform types. Optimal portfolio solutions reflected this non-linearity of platform preferences along an efficiency frontier and diverged from a model simply ranking projects by PoS-to-Cost, despite significant revisions to project PoS estimates during the review process in relation to the conduct of the DCE. Large confidence intervals associated with optimization solutions suggested significant uncertainty in portfolio valuations. Mean-variance and Mean-Gini tests suggested optimal portfolios with higher expected values were also accompanied by higher risks of not achieving those values despite stochastic dominance of the optimal portfolio solution under the decision maker’s budget constraint. This portfolio was also the highest ranked portfolio in the simulation; though having only a 54% probability of being preferred to the second-ranked portfolio. The analysis illustrates how optimization modelling can help health R&D decision makers identify optimal portfolios in the face of significant decision uncertainty involving portfolio trade-offs. However, in light of such extreme uncertainty, further due diligence and ongoing updating of performance is needed on highly risky projects as well as data on decision makers’ portfolio risk attitude before PDA can conclude about optimal and robust solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78776212021-02-19 Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis Gouglas, Dimitrios Marsh, Kevin PLoS One Research Article This study reports on the application of a Portfolio Decision Analysis (PDA) to support investment decisions of a non-profit funder of vaccine technology platform development for rapid response to emerging infections. A value framework was constructed via document reviews and stakeholder consultations. Probability of Success (PoS) data was obtained for 16 platform projects through expert assessments and stakeholder portfolio preferences via a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). The structure of preferences and the uncertainties in project PoS suggested a non-linear, stochastic value maximization problem. A simulation-optimization algorithm was employed, identifying optimal portfolios under different budget constraints. Stochastic dominance of the optimization solution was tested via mean-variance and mean-Gini statistics, and its robustness via rank probability analysis in a Monte Carlo simulation. Project PoS estimates were low and substantially overlapping. The DCE identified decreasing rates of return to investing in single platform types. Optimal portfolio solutions reflected this non-linearity of platform preferences along an efficiency frontier and diverged from a model simply ranking projects by PoS-to-Cost, despite significant revisions to project PoS estimates during the review process in relation to the conduct of the DCE. Large confidence intervals associated with optimization solutions suggested significant uncertainty in portfolio valuations. Mean-variance and Mean-Gini tests suggested optimal portfolios with higher expected values were also accompanied by higher risks of not achieving those values despite stochastic dominance of the optimal portfolio solution under the decision maker’s budget constraint. This portfolio was also the highest ranked portfolio in the simulation; though having only a 54% probability of being preferred to the second-ranked portfolio. The analysis illustrates how optimization modelling can help health R&D decision makers identify optimal portfolios in the face of significant decision uncertainty involving portfolio trade-offs. However, in light of such extreme uncertainty, further due diligence and ongoing updating of performance is needed on highly risky projects as well as data on decision makers’ portfolio risk attitude before PDA can conclude about optimal and robust solutions. Public Library of Science 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7877621/ /pubmed/33571206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246235 Text en © 2021 Gouglas, Marsh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gouglas, Dimitrios
Marsh, Kevin
Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
title Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
title_full Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
title_fullStr Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
title_short Prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: A portfolio decision analysis
title_sort prioritizing investments in rapid response vaccine technologies for emerging infections: a portfolio decision analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33571206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246235
work_keys_str_mv AT gouglasdimitrios prioritizinginvestmentsinrapidresponsevaccinetechnologiesforemerginginfectionsaportfoliodecisionanalysis
AT marshkevin prioritizinginvestmentsinrapidresponsevaccinetechnologiesforemerginginfectionsaportfoliodecisionanalysis