Cargando…

Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital

There is limited evidence to support pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in children. We conducted a retrospective review of PGx testing among 452 patients at an academic children’s hospital to determine the potential utility of PGx in diseases of childhood and to identify targets for future pediatric pha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Timothy A., Wagner, Jennifer A., Sandritter, Tracy, Black, Benjamin T., Gaedigk, Andrea, Stancil, Stephani L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12895
_version_ 1783650247779549184
author Roberts, Timothy A.
Wagner, Jennifer A.
Sandritter, Tracy
Black, Benjamin T.
Gaedigk, Andrea
Stancil, Stephani L.
author_facet Roberts, Timothy A.
Wagner, Jennifer A.
Sandritter, Tracy
Black, Benjamin T.
Gaedigk, Andrea
Stancil, Stephani L.
author_sort Roberts, Timothy A.
collection PubMed
description There is limited evidence to support pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in children. We conducted a retrospective review of PGx testing among 452 patients at an academic children’s hospital to determine the potential utility of PGx in diseases of childhood and to identify targets for future pediatric pharmacogenetic research. An actionable gene‐drug pair associated with the 28 genes tested (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A or B, Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) level 1A or B, or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation and a PharmGKB level) was present in 98.7% of patients. We identified 203 actionable gene‐drug‐diagnosis groups based on the indications for each actionable drug listed in Lexicomp. Among patients with an actionable gene‐drug‐diagnosis group, 49.3% had a diagnosis where the drug was a therapeutic option and PGx could be used to guide treatment selection. Among patients with an associated diagnosis, 30.9% had a prescription for the actionable drug allowing PGx guided dosing. Three genes (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5) accounted for all the gene‐drug‐diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions. The most common gene‐drug‐diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions were CYP2C19‐citalopram‐escitalopram‐depression 3.3% of patients tested; CYP2C19‐dexlansoprazole‐gastritis‐esophagitis 3.1%; CYP2C19‐omeprazole‐gastritis‐esophagitis 2.4%; CYP2D6‐atomoxetine‐attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2.2%; and CYP2C19‐citalopram‐escitalopram‐obsessive‐compulsive disorder 1.5%. PGx could be used to guide selection of current treatment options or medication dosing in almost half (48.7%) of pediatric patients tested. Mood disorders and gastritis/esophagitis are promising targets for future study of PGx testing because of the high prevalence of these diagnoses and associated actionable gene‐drug pairs in the pediatric population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7877836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78778362021-02-18 Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital Roberts, Timothy A. Wagner, Jennifer A. Sandritter, Tracy Black, Benjamin T. Gaedigk, Andrea Stancil, Stephani L. Clin Transl Sci Research There is limited evidence to support pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in children. We conducted a retrospective review of PGx testing among 452 patients at an academic children’s hospital to determine the potential utility of PGx in diseases of childhood and to identify targets for future pediatric pharmacogenetic research. An actionable gene‐drug pair associated with the 28 genes tested (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A or B, Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) level 1A or B, or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation and a PharmGKB level) was present in 98.7% of patients. We identified 203 actionable gene‐drug‐diagnosis groups based on the indications for each actionable drug listed in Lexicomp. Among patients with an actionable gene‐drug‐diagnosis group, 49.3% had a diagnosis where the drug was a therapeutic option and PGx could be used to guide treatment selection. Among patients with an associated diagnosis, 30.9% had a prescription for the actionable drug allowing PGx guided dosing. Three genes (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5) accounted for all the gene‐drug‐diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions. The most common gene‐drug‐diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions were CYP2C19‐citalopram‐escitalopram‐depression 3.3% of patients tested; CYP2C19‐dexlansoprazole‐gastritis‐esophagitis 3.1%; CYP2C19‐omeprazole‐gastritis‐esophagitis 2.4%; CYP2D6‐atomoxetine‐attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2.2%; and CYP2C19‐citalopram‐escitalopram‐obsessive‐compulsive disorder 1.5%. PGx could be used to guide selection of current treatment options or medication dosing in almost half (48.7%) of pediatric patients tested. Mood disorders and gastritis/esophagitis are promising targets for future study of PGx testing because of the high prevalence of these diagnoses and associated actionable gene‐drug pairs in the pediatric population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-15 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7877836/ /pubmed/33048453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12895 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research
Roberts, Timothy A.
Wagner, Jennifer A.
Sandritter, Tracy
Black, Benjamin T.
Gaedigk, Andrea
Stancil, Stephani L.
Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital
title Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital
title_full Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital
title_fullStr Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital
title_short Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children’s Hospital
title_sort retrospective review of pharmacogenetic testing at an academic children’s hospital
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7877836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12895
work_keys_str_mv AT robertstimothya retrospectivereviewofpharmacogenetictestingatanacademicchildrenshospital
AT wagnerjennifera retrospectivereviewofpharmacogenetictestingatanacademicchildrenshospital
AT sandrittertracy retrospectivereviewofpharmacogenetictestingatanacademicchildrenshospital
AT blackbenjamint retrospectivereviewofpharmacogenetictestingatanacademicchildrenshospital
AT gaedigkandrea retrospectivereviewofpharmacogenetictestingatanacademicchildrenshospital
AT stancilstephanil retrospectivereviewofpharmacogenetictestingatanacademicchildrenshospital