Cargando…
Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality can be severely impaired by artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic retainers. In clinical practice, there is a trend towards using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) retainers. This study aimed to quantify MRI artifa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03450-x |
_version_ | 1783650312046772224 |
---|---|
author | Roser, Christoph Hilgenfeld, Tim Sen, Sinan Badrow, Tobias Zingler, Sebastian Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Lux, Christopher J. Juerchott, Alexander |
author_facet | Roser, Christoph Hilgenfeld, Tim Sen, Sinan Badrow, Tobias Zingler, Sebastian Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Lux, Christopher J. Juerchott, Alexander |
author_sort | Roser, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality can be severely impaired by artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic retainers. In clinical practice, there is a trend towards using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) retainers. This study aimed to quantify MRI artifacts produced by these novel CAD/CAM retainers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three CAD/CAM retainers and a stainless-steel retainer (“Twistflex”; clinical reference standard) were scanned in vitro at 3-T MRI using a high-resolution 3D sequence. The artifact diameters and three-dimensional artifact volumes (AV) were determined for all mandibular (AV(mand)) and maxillary (AV(max)) retainers. Moreover, the corresponding ratio of artifact volume to retainer volume (AV/RV(mand), AV/RV(max)) was calculated. RESULTS: Twistflex caused large artifact volumes (AV(mand): 13530 mm(3); AV(max): 15642 mm(3); AV/RV(mand): 2602; AV/RV(max): 2235). By contrast, artifact volumes for CAD/CAM retainers were substantially smaller: whereas artifact volumes for cobalt–chromium retainers were moderate (381 mm(3); 394 mm(3); 39; 31), grade-5 titanium (110 mm(3); 126 mm(3); 12; 12) and nickel–titanium (54 mm(3); 78 mm(3); 12; 14) both produced very small artifact volumes. CONCLUSION: All CAD/CAM retainers caused substantially smaller volumes of MRI artifacts compared to Twistflex. Grade-5 titanium and nickel–titanium CAD/CAM retainers showed the smallest artifact volumes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CAD/CAM retainers made from titanium or nickel–titanium may not relevantly impair image quality in head/neck and dental MRI. Artifacts caused by cobalt–chromium CAD/CAM retainers may mask nearby dental/periodontal structures. In contrast, the large artifacts caused by Twistflex are likely to severely impair diagnosis of oral and adjacent pathologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7878219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78782192021-02-22 Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study Roser, Christoph Hilgenfeld, Tim Sen, Sinan Badrow, Tobias Zingler, Sebastian Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Lux, Christopher J. Juerchott, Alexander Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality can be severely impaired by artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic retainers. In clinical practice, there is a trend towards using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) retainers. This study aimed to quantify MRI artifacts produced by these novel CAD/CAM retainers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three CAD/CAM retainers and a stainless-steel retainer (“Twistflex”; clinical reference standard) were scanned in vitro at 3-T MRI using a high-resolution 3D sequence. The artifact diameters and three-dimensional artifact volumes (AV) were determined for all mandibular (AV(mand)) and maxillary (AV(max)) retainers. Moreover, the corresponding ratio of artifact volume to retainer volume (AV/RV(mand), AV/RV(max)) was calculated. RESULTS: Twistflex caused large artifact volumes (AV(mand): 13530 mm(3); AV(max): 15642 mm(3); AV/RV(mand): 2602; AV/RV(max): 2235). By contrast, artifact volumes for CAD/CAM retainers were substantially smaller: whereas artifact volumes for cobalt–chromium retainers were moderate (381 mm(3); 394 mm(3); 39; 31), grade-5 titanium (110 mm(3); 126 mm(3); 12; 12) and nickel–titanium (54 mm(3); 78 mm(3); 12; 14) both produced very small artifact volumes. CONCLUSION: All CAD/CAM retainers caused substantially smaller volumes of MRI artifacts compared to Twistflex. Grade-5 titanium and nickel–titanium CAD/CAM retainers showed the smallest artifact volumes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CAD/CAM retainers made from titanium or nickel–titanium may not relevantly impair image quality in head/neck and dental MRI. Artifacts caused by cobalt–chromium CAD/CAM retainers may mask nearby dental/periodontal structures. In contrast, the large artifacts caused by Twistflex are likely to severely impair diagnosis of oral and adjacent pathologies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7878219/ /pubmed/32785849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03450-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Roser, Christoph Hilgenfeld, Tim Sen, Sinan Badrow, Tobias Zingler, Sebastian Heiland, Sabine Bendszus, Martin Lux, Christopher J. Juerchott, Alexander Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study |
title | Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study |
title_full | Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study |
title_short | Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers—an in vitro study |
title_sort | evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic cad/cam retainers—an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03450-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roserchristoph evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT hilgenfeldtim evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT sensinan evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT badrowtobias evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT zinglersebastian evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT heilandsabine evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT bendszusmartin evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT luxchristopherj evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy AT juerchottalexander evaluationofmagneticresonanceimagingartifactscausedbyfixedorthodonticcadcamretainersaninvitrostudy |