Cargando…

OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03753256) was to assess orthodontic surface sealant layer thickness and integrity in vivo during a 12-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography (OCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a split-mouth design, quadrants of 20 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şen, Sinan, Erber, Ralf, Orhan, Gül, Zingler, Sebastian, Lux, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03753256) was to assess orthodontic surface sealant layer thickness and integrity in vivo during a 12-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography (OCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a split-mouth design, quadrants of 20 patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances were included. Quadrants were randomly assigned to the sealants Pro Seal® (PS) or Opal® Seal™ (OS). OCT scans were performed immediately after the application of the sealants and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Sealant layer thicknesses and their integrity were determined at 5 regions of interest (ROIs) known for high risks of demineralization. Sealant integrity loss was determined using a self-developed scale. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients successfully completed the study. The studied sealants showed significant differences in initial layer thickness. Mean layer thickness was significantly lower for PS (67.8 μm, (95% CI, 56.1–79.5)) than for OS (110.7 μm, (95% CI, 97.3–124.1)). Layer thickness loss was significant after 3 months for PS and after 6 months for OS. Sealant integrity was compromised in more than 50% of the ROIs already after 3 months for both sealants. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with fixed orthodontic surface sealants lost the integrity of the protective layer in more than 50% of cases after 3 months, and the layer thickness of the sealants was significantly reduced after 3–6 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The protective effect against demineralization lesions of orthodontic sealants in patients treated with fixed appliances appears to be limited in time. Further preventive measures should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 03753256) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.