Cargando…

OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03753256) was to assess orthodontic surface sealant layer thickness and integrity in vivo during a 12-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography (OCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a split-mouth design, quadrants of 20 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şen, Sinan, Erber, Ralf, Orhan, Gül, Zingler, Sebastian, Lux, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7
_version_ 1783650320590569472
author Şen, Sinan
Erber, Ralf
Orhan, Gül
Zingler, Sebastian
Lux, Christopher J.
author_facet Şen, Sinan
Erber, Ralf
Orhan, Gül
Zingler, Sebastian
Lux, Christopher J.
author_sort Şen, Sinan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03753256) was to assess orthodontic surface sealant layer thickness and integrity in vivo during a 12-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography (OCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a split-mouth design, quadrants of 20 patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances were included. Quadrants were randomly assigned to the sealants Pro Seal® (PS) or Opal® Seal™ (OS). OCT scans were performed immediately after the application of the sealants and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Sealant layer thicknesses and their integrity were determined at 5 regions of interest (ROIs) known for high risks of demineralization. Sealant integrity loss was determined using a self-developed scale. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients successfully completed the study. The studied sealants showed significant differences in initial layer thickness. Mean layer thickness was significantly lower for PS (67.8 μm, (95% CI, 56.1–79.5)) than for OS (110.7 μm, (95% CI, 97.3–124.1)). Layer thickness loss was significant after 3 months for PS and after 6 months for OS. Sealant integrity was compromised in more than 50% of the ROIs already after 3 months for both sealants. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with fixed orthodontic surface sealants lost the integrity of the protective layer in more than 50% of cases after 3 months, and the layer thickness of the sealants was significantly reduced after 3–6 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The protective effect against demineralization lesions of orthodontic sealants in patients treated with fixed appliances appears to be limited in time. Further preventive measures should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 03753256) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7878257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78782572021-02-22 OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial Şen, Sinan Erber, Ralf Orhan, Gül Zingler, Sebastian Lux, Christopher J. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this single-center randomized controlled trial (NCT03753256) was to assess orthodontic surface sealant layer thickness and integrity in vivo during a 12-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography (OCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a split-mouth design, quadrants of 20 patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances were included. Quadrants were randomly assigned to the sealants Pro Seal® (PS) or Opal® Seal™ (OS). OCT scans were performed immediately after the application of the sealants and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Sealant layer thicknesses and their integrity were determined at 5 regions of interest (ROIs) known for high risks of demineralization. Sealant integrity loss was determined using a self-developed scale. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients successfully completed the study. The studied sealants showed significant differences in initial layer thickness. Mean layer thickness was significantly lower for PS (67.8 μm, (95% CI, 56.1–79.5)) than for OS (110.7 μm, (95% CI, 97.3–124.1)). Layer thickness loss was significant after 3 months for PS and after 6 months for OS. Sealant integrity was compromised in more than 50% of the ROIs already after 3 months for both sealants. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with fixed orthodontic surface sealants lost the integrity of the protective layer in more than 50% of cases after 3 months, and the layer thickness of the sealants was significantly reduced after 3–6 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The protective effect against demineralization lesions of orthodontic sealants in patients treated with fixed appliances appears to be limited in time. Further preventive measures should be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 03753256) ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7878257/ /pubmed/32789656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Şen, Sinan
Erber, Ralf
Orhan, Gül
Zingler, Sebastian
Lux, Christopher J.
OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
title OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
title_full OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
title_short OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
title_sort oct evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32789656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sensinan octevaluationoforthodonticsurfacesealantsa12monthfollowuprandomizedclinicaltrial
AT erberralf octevaluationoforthodonticsurfacesealantsa12monthfollowuprandomizedclinicaltrial
AT orhangul octevaluationoforthodonticsurfacesealantsa12monthfollowuprandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zinglersebastian octevaluationoforthodonticsurfacesealantsa12monthfollowuprandomizedclinicaltrial
AT luxchristopherj octevaluationoforthodonticsurfacesealantsa12monthfollowuprandomizedclinicaltrial