Cargando…

Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of partial glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press) posterior restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 765 restorations in 158 patients were placed between 2008 and 2018 and evaluated in a prospective study during regular dental care visits between 2015...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Breemer, Carline R. G, Buijs, Gerrit J., Cune, Marco S., Özcan, Mutlu, Kerdijk, Wouter, Van der Made, Stephan, Gresnigt, Marco M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03454-7
_version_ 1783650321530093568
author Van den Breemer, Carline R. G
Buijs, Gerrit J.
Cune, Marco S.
Özcan, Mutlu
Kerdijk, Wouter
Van der Made, Stephan
Gresnigt, Marco M. M.
author_facet Van den Breemer, Carline R. G
Buijs, Gerrit J.
Cune, Marco S.
Özcan, Mutlu
Kerdijk, Wouter
Van der Made, Stephan
Gresnigt, Marco M. M.
author_sort Van den Breemer, Carline R. G
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of partial glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press) posterior restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 765 restorations in 158 patients were placed between 2008 and 2018 and evaluated in a prospective study during regular dental care visits between 2015 and 2018. The restorations were luted with a conventional photo-polymerized resin composite (HFO) in conjunction with an Immediate Dentin Sealing procedure (IDS). Intra-oral photographs and radiographs were made and evaluated using USPHS criteria. RESULTS: The mean observation time was 53.3 months (range 3–113 months). Three absolute failures occurred (tooth fractures, n = 2; apical re-infection, n = 1) all leading to the loss of the restored tooth. Repairable and salvageable failures occurred in 9 teeth (endodontic complications, n = 7; secondary caries, n = 1; debonding, n = 1). The survival and success rates according to Kaplan-Meier after 5 years cumulated to 99.6% and 98.6%, respectively. Location (premolar/molar and mandibula/maxilla), pre-restorative endodontic status (vital/devitalised) and extension of the indirect ceramic restoration (number of sides and cusps involved) did not significantly affect the cumulative success rate (log rank test, p > 0.05). The condition of the vast majority of the restorations remained unaffected for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations (pressed lithium disilicate (IPS e.max press, Ivoclar Vivadent) luted by means of a conventional photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with the use of an IDS procedure have an excellent medium-term prognosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations can be considered as a highly reliable treatment option. Location and extension of the restoration and pre-restorative endodontic status do not affect success rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7878261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78782612021-02-22 Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing Van den Breemer, Carline R. G Buijs, Gerrit J. Cune, Marco S. Özcan, Mutlu Kerdijk, Wouter Van der Made, Stephan Gresnigt, Marco M. M. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of partial glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press) posterior restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 765 restorations in 158 patients were placed between 2008 and 2018 and evaluated in a prospective study during regular dental care visits between 2015 and 2018. The restorations were luted with a conventional photo-polymerized resin composite (HFO) in conjunction with an Immediate Dentin Sealing procedure (IDS). Intra-oral photographs and radiographs were made and evaluated using USPHS criteria. RESULTS: The mean observation time was 53.3 months (range 3–113 months). Three absolute failures occurred (tooth fractures, n = 2; apical re-infection, n = 1) all leading to the loss of the restored tooth. Repairable and salvageable failures occurred in 9 teeth (endodontic complications, n = 7; secondary caries, n = 1; debonding, n = 1). The survival and success rates according to Kaplan-Meier after 5 years cumulated to 99.6% and 98.6%, respectively. Location (premolar/molar and mandibula/maxilla), pre-restorative endodontic status (vital/devitalised) and extension of the indirect ceramic restoration (number of sides and cusps involved) did not significantly affect the cumulative success rate (log rank test, p > 0.05). The condition of the vast majority of the restorations remained unaffected for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations (pressed lithium disilicate (IPS e.max press, Ivoclar Vivadent) luted by means of a conventional photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with the use of an IDS procedure have an excellent medium-term prognosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations can be considered as a highly reliable treatment option. Location and extension of the restoration and pre-restorative endodontic status do not affect success rate. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7878261/ /pubmed/32785851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03454-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Van den Breemer, Carline R. G
Buijs, Gerrit J.
Cune, Marco S.
Özcan, Mutlu
Kerdijk, Wouter
Van der Made, Stephan
Gresnigt, Marco M. M.
Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
title Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
title_full Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
title_fullStr Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
title_full_unstemmed Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
title_short Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
title_sort prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03454-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbreemercarlinerg prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing
AT buijsgerritj prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing
AT cunemarcos prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing
AT ozcanmutlu prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing
AT kerdijkwouter prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing
AT vandermadestephan prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing
AT gresnigtmarcomm prospectiveclinicalevaluationof765partialglassceramicposteriorrestorationslutedusingphotopolymerizedresincompositeinconjunctionwithimmediatedentinsealing