Cargando…

Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee

PURPOSE: The poor prognosis in patients with floating knee injuries is mainly contributed to articular involvement (Fraser’s type Ⅱ). This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes among different Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee injuries after surgical management. METHODS: Twenty-seve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chouhan, Deepak, Chouhan, Devendra K., Kanojia, Rajendra K., Behera, Prateek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33339679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.11.010
_version_ 1783650336782680064
author Chouhan, Deepak
Chouhan, Devendra K.
Kanojia, Rajendra K.
Behera, Prateek
author_facet Chouhan, Deepak
Chouhan, Devendra K.
Kanojia, Rajendra K.
Behera, Prateek
author_sort Chouhan, Deepak
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The poor prognosis in patients with floating knee injuries is mainly contributed to articular involvement (Fraser’s type Ⅱ). This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes among different Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee injuries after surgical management. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee injuries (54 fractures) between September 2014 and December 2015 were enrolled prospectively in this study and were distributed according to Fraser’s floating knee classification into three different groups as type ⅡA (ipsilateral femoral shaft and tibial intra-articular involvement, n = 11), type ⅡB (ipsilateral tibial shaft and femoral intra-articular involvement, n = 9) and type ⅡC (both femoral and tibial intra-articular involvement, n = 7). The differences among the groups were evaluated and compared. The functional outcomes of these injuries at one year were analyzed using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) which covers 5 subscales of pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and quality of life. The result was also compared with standardized age-sex matched healthy population using paired samples t-test. RESULTS: All the patients were male, and the injury mechanism was solely roadside accident. The mean age was 29.8 years and injury severity score 17.9 (comparable in all the three groups). Most injuries were observed on the right side (20 cases, 74.1%). Based on paired samples t-test, the KOOS score of patients with Fraser’s type ⅡA was found to be better than that of type ⅡB and type ⅡC. Compared with the reference age-sex matched control group, patients with Fraser’s type ⅡB and ⅡC fractures had significantly lower mean score in all KOOS subscales (all p < 0.01). However, Fraser’s type ⅡA only revealed significant difference regarding the subscales of activities of daily living (p < 0.0001), sports and recreation (p < 0.0001), and quality of life (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with Fraser’s type ⅡA fractures had a better functional outcome as compared to those with type ⅡB and ⅡC fractures. This might be due to the open intra-articular involvement of the distal femur of the latter two fracture types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7878454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78784542021-02-18 Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee Chouhan, Deepak Chouhan, Devendra K. Kanojia, Rajendra K. Behera, Prateek Chin J Traumatol Original Article PURPOSE: The poor prognosis in patients with floating knee injuries is mainly contributed to articular involvement (Fraser’s type Ⅱ). This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes among different Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee injuries after surgical management. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee injuries (54 fractures) between September 2014 and December 2015 were enrolled prospectively in this study and were distributed according to Fraser’s floating knee classification into three different groups as type ⅡA (ipsilateral femoral shaft and tibial intra-articular involvement, n = 11), type ⅡB (ipsilateral tibial shaft and femoral intra-articular involvement, n = 9) and type ⅡC (both femoral and tibial intra-articular involvement, n = 7). The differences among the groups were evaluated and compared. The functional outcomes of these injuries at one year were analyzed using Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) which covers 5 subscales of pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and quality of life. The result was also compared with standardized age-sex matched healthy population using paired samples t-test. RESULTS: All the patients were male, and the injury mechanism was solely roadside accident. The mean age was 29.8 years and injury severity score 17.9 (comparable in all the three groups). Most injuries were observed on the right side (20 cases, 74.1%). Based on paired samples t-test, the KOOS score of patients with Fraser’s type ⅡA was found to be better than that of type ⅡB and type ⅡC. Compared with the reference age-sex matched control group, patients with Fraser’s type ⅡB and ⅡC fractures had significantly lower mean score in all KOOS subscales (all p < 0.01). However, Fraser’s type ⅡA only revealed significant difference regarding the subscales of activities of daily living (p < 0.0001), sports and recreation (p < 0.0001), and quality of life (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that patients with Fraser’s type ⅡA fractures had a better functional outcome as compared to those with type ⅡB and ⅡC fractures. This might be due to the open intra-articular involvement of the distal femur of the latter two fracture types. Elsevier 2021-02 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7878454/ /pubmed/33339679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.11.010 Text en © 2020 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Chouhan, Deepak
Chouhan, Devendra K.
Kanojia, Rajendra K.
Behera, Prateek
Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee
title Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee
title_full Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee
title_fullStr Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee
title_short Comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of Fraser’s type Ⅱ floating knee
title_sort comparison of functional outcomes among subtypes of fraser’s type ⅱ floating knee
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33339679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.11.010
work_keys_str_mv AT chouhandeepak comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesamongsubtypesoffraserstypeiifloatingknee
AT chouhandevendrak comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesamongsubtypesoffraserstypeiifloatingknee
AT kanojiarajendrak comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesamongsubtypesoffraserstypeiifloatingknee
AT beheraprateek comparisonoffunctionaloutcomesamongsubtypesoffraserstypeiifloatingknee