Cargando…
Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity
The initial footprint of an earthquake can be extended considerably by triggering of clustered aftershocks. Such earthquake–earthquake interactions have been studied extensively for data-rich, stationary natural seismicity. Induced seismicity, however, is intrinsically inhomogeneous in time and spac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2 |
_version_ | 1783650349916094464 |
---|---|
author | Post, Richard A. J. Michels, Matthias A. J. Ampuero, Jean-Paul Candela, Thibault Fokker, Peter A. van Wees, Jan-Diederik Hofstad, Remco W. van der Heuvel, Edwin R. van den |
author_facet | Post, Richard A. J. Michels, Matthias A. J. Ampuero, Jean-Paul Candela, Thibault Fokker, Peter A. van Wees, Jan-Diederik Hofstad, Remco W. van der Heuvel, Edwin R. van den |
author_sort | Post, Richard A. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The initial footprint of an earthquake can be extended considerably by triggering of clustered aftershocks. Such earthquake–earthquake interactions have been studied extensively for data-rich, stationary natural seismicity. Induced seismicity, however, is intrinsically inhomogeneous in time and space and may have a limited catalog of events; this may hamper the distinction between human-induced background events and triggered aftershocks. Here we introduce a novel Gamma Accelerated-Failure-Time model for efficiently analyzing interevent-time distributions in such cases. It addresses the spatiotemporal variation and quantifies, per event, the probability of each event to have been triggered. Distentangling the obscuring aftershocks from the background events is a crucial step to better understand the causal relationship between operational parameters and non-stationary induced seismicity. Applied to the Groningen gas field in the North of the Netherlands, our model elucidates geological and operational drivers of seismicity and has been used to test for aftershock triggering. We find that the hazard rate in Groningen is indeed enhanced after each event and conclude that aftershock triggering cannot be ignored. In particular we find that the non-stationary interevent-time distribution is well described by our Gamma model. This model suggests that 27.0(± 8.5)% of the recorded events in the Groningen field can be attributed to triggering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7878511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78785112021-02-12 Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity Post, Richard A. J. Michels, Matthias A. J. Ampuero, Jean-Paul Candela, Thibault Fokker, Peter A. van Wees, Jan-Diederik Hofstad, Remco W. van der Heuvel, Edwin R. van den Sci Rep Article The initial footprint of an earthquake can be extended considerably by triggering of clustered aftershocks. Such earthquake–earthquake interactions have been studied extensively for data-rich, stationary natural seismicity. Induced seismicity, however, is intrinsically inhomogeneous in time and space and may have a limited catalog of events; this may hamper the distinction between human-induced background events and triggered aftershocks. Here we introduce a novel Gamma Accelerated-Failure-Time model for efficiently analyzing interevent-time distributions in such cases. It addresses the spatiotemporal variation and quantifies, per event, the probability of each event to have been triggered. Distentangling the obscuring aftershocks from the background events is a crucial step to better understand the causal relationship between operational parameters and non-stationary induced seismicity. Applied to the Groningen gas field in the North of the Netherlands, our model elucidates geological and operational drivers of seismicity and has been used to test for aftershock triggering. We find that the hazard rate in Groningen is indeed enhanced after each event and conclude that aftershock triggering cannot be ignored. In particular we find that the non-stationary interevent-time distribution is well described by our Gamma model. This model suggests that 27.0(± 8.5)% of the recorded events in the Groningen field can be attributed to triggering. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7878511/ /pubmed/33574409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Post, Richard A. J. Michels, Matthias A. J. Ampuero, Jean-Paul Candela, Thibault Fokker, Peter A. van Wees, Jan-Diederik Hofstad, Remco W. van der Heuvel, Edwin R. van den Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
title | Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
title_full | Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
title_fullStr | Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
title_full_unstemmed | Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
title_short | Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
title_sort | interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT postrichardaj intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT michelsmatthiasaj intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT ampuerojeanpaul intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT candelathibault intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT fokkerpetera intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT vanweesjandiederik intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT hofstadremcowvander intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity AT heuveledwinrvanden intereventtimedistributionandaftershockfrequencyinnonstationaryinducedseismicity |