Cargando…
Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack
BACKGROUND: The Protocol-guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurologic Symptoms (PREVENT) program was designed to address systemic barriers to providing timely guideline-concordant care for patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated an implemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w |
_version_ | 1783650365488496640 |
---|---|
author | Damush, T. M. Miech, E. J. Rattray, N. A. Homoya, B. Penney, Lauren S. Cheatham, A. Baird, S. Myers, J Austin, C. Myers, L J Perkins, A J Zhang, Y. Giacherio, B. Kumar, M Murphy, LD Sico, J J. Bravata, D. M. |
author_facet | Damush, T. M. Miech, E. J. Rattray, N. A. Homoya, B. Penney, Lauren S. Cheatham, A. Baird, S. Myers, J Austin, C. Myers, L J Perkins, A J Zhang, Y. Giacherio, B. Kumar, M Murphy, LD Sico, J J. Bravata, D. M. |
author_sort | Damush, T. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Protocol-guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurologic Symptoms (PREVENT) program was designed to address systemic barriers to providing timely guideline-concordant care for patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated an implementation bundle used to promote local adaptation and adoption of a multi-component, complex quality improvement (QI) intervention to improve the quality of TIA care Bravata et al. (BMC Neurology 19:294, 2019). DESIGN: A stepped-wedge implementation trial with six geographically diverse sites. PARTICIPANTS: The six facility QI teams were multi-disciplinary, clinical staff. INTERVENTIONS: PREVENT employed a bundle of key implementation strategies: team activation; external facilitation; and a community of practice. This strategy bundle had direct ties to four constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): Champions, Reflecting & Evaluating, Planning, and Goals & Feedback. MAIN MEASURES: Using a mixed-methods approach guided by the CFIR and data matrix analyses, we evaluated the degree to which implementation success and clinical improvement were associated with implementation strategies. The primary outcomes were the number of completed implementation activities, the level of team organization and > 15 points improvement in the Without Fail Rate (WFR) over 1 year. KEY RESULTS: Facility QI teams actively engaged in the implementation strategies with high utilization. Facilities with the greatest implementation success were those with central champions whose teams engaged in planning and goal setting, and regularly reflected upon their quality data and evaluated their progress against their QI plan. The strong presence of effective champions acted as a pre-condition for the strong presence of Reflecting & Evaluating, Goals & Feedback, and Planning (rather than the other way around), helping to explain how champions at the +2 level influenced ongoing implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The CFIR-guided bundle of implementation strategies facilitated the local implementation of the PREVENT QI program and was associated with clinical improvement in the national VA healthcare system. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02769338 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7878645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78786452021-02-24 Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack Damush, T. M. Miech, E. J. Rattray, N. A. Homoya, B. Penney, Lauren S. Cheatham, A. Baird, S. Myers, J Austin, C. Myers, L J Perkins, A J Zhang, Y. Giacherio, B. Kumar, M Murphy, LD Sico, J J. Bravata, D. M. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The Protocol-guided Rapid Evaluation of Veterans Experiencing New Transient Neurologic Symptoms (PREVENT) program was designed to address systemic barriers to providing timely guideline-concordant care for patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated an implementation bundle used to promote local adaptation and adoption of a multi-component, complex quality improvement (QI) intervention to improve the quality of TIA care Bravata et al. (BMC Neurology 19:294, 2019). DESIGN: A stepped-wedge implementation trial with six geographically diverse sites. PARTICIPANTS: The six facility QI teams were multi-disciplinary, clinical staff. INTERVENTIONS: PREVENT employed a bundle of key implementation strategies: team activation; external facilitation; and a community of practice. This strategy bundle had direct ties to four constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): Champions, Reflecting & Evaluating, Planning, and Goals & Feedback. MAIN MEASURES: Using a mixed-methods approach guided by the CFIR and data matrix analyses, we evaluated the degree to which implementation success and clinical improvement were associated with implementation strategies. The primary outcomes were the number of completed implementation activities, the level of team organization and > 15 points improvement in the Without Fail Rate (WFR) over 1 year. KEY RESULTS: Facility QI teams actively engaged in the implementation strategies with high utilization. Facilities with the greatest implementation success were those with central champions whose teams engaged in planning and goal setting, and regularly reflected upon their quality data and evaluated their progress against their QI plan. The strong presence of effective champions acted as a pre-condition for the strong presence of Reflecting & Evaluating, Goals & Feedback, and Planning (rather than the other way around), helping to explain how champions at the +2 level influenced ongoing implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The CFIR-guided bundle of implementation strategies facilitated the local implementation of the PREVENT QI program and was associated with clinical improvement in the national VA healthcare system. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02769338 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-03 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7878645/ /pubmed/33145694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Damush, T. M. Miech, E. J. Rattray, N. A. Homoya, B. Penney, Lauren S. Cheatham, A. Baird, S. Myers, J Austin, C. Myers, L J Perkins, A J Zhang, Y. Giacherio, B. Kumar, M Murphy, LD Sico, J J. Bravata, D. M. Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack |
title | Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack |
title_full | Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack |
title_fullStr | Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack |
title_short | Implementation Evaluation of a Complex Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Care for Veterans with Transient Ischemic Attack |
title_sort | implementation evaluation of a complex intervention to improve timeliness of care for veterans with transient ischemic attack |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33145694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06100-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damushtm implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT miechej implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT rattrayna implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT homoyab implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT penneylaurens implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT cheathama implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT bairds implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT myersj implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT austinc implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT myerslj implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT perkinsaj implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT zhangy implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT giacheriob implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT kumarm implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT murphyld implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT sicojj implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack AT bravatadm implementationevaluationofacomplexinterventiontoimprovetimelinessofcareforveteranswithtransientischemicattack |