Cargando…
A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects
Objective: Pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between biosimilar candidate LRG201902 and European Union-sourced liraglutide reference product (Victoza(®)) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. Methods: This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study (CTR2019234...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.610880 |
_version_ | 1783650369021149184 |
---|---|
author | Mai, Gang Fan, Lianlian Li, Mupeng Zhang, Peiwen Gan, Chunyan Huang, Qian Shentu, Jianzhong |
author_facet | Mai, Gang Fan, Lianlian Li, Mupeng Zhang, Peiwen Gan, Chunyan Huang, Qian Shentu, Jianzhong |
author_sort | Mai, Gang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between biosimilar candidate LRG201902 and European Union-sourced liraglutide reference product (Victoza(®)) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. Methods: This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study (CTR20192342) was conducted in thirty-eight healthy adult male subjects. Volunteers were randomized 1:1 at the beginning to receive a single 0.6 mg dose of Victoza(®) or LRG201902 by subcutaneous injection during the first period. Following 8 days washout period, all subjects received the alternate formulation during the second period. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h after administration. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were AUC(0–t), AUC(0–∞), and C(max). Pharmacokinetic similarity was achieved if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC0-t, AUC(0–∞), and C(max) were within the range of 80–125%. Other pharmacokinetic parameters including T(max), t(½), and λ(z) were also measured. Safety profile and immunogenicity data were collected from each subject. Results: C(max), AUC(0–t), and AUC(0–∞) were similar between the two groups. GMRs of Cmax, AUC(0–t), and AUC(0–∞) were 113.50%, 107.21%, and 106.97% between LRG201902 and Victoza(®) respectively. The 90% CIs for the GMRs of C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0–∞) were all within the PK equivalence criteria. Mean serum concentration-time profiles, secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (T(max), t(½), and λ(z)) were comparable between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 27.8% and 23.7% subjects in the LRG201902 and Victoza(®) arms, respectively. All post-dose samples were detected negative for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates pharmacokinetic similarity of LRG201902 to Victoza(®) in healthy subjects. The safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar for the two products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7878668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78786682021-02-13 A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects Mai, Gang Fan, Lianlian Li, Mupeng Zhang, Peiwen Gan, Chunyan Huang, Qian Shentu, Jianzhong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: Pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between biosimilar candidate LRG201902 and European Union-sourced liraglutide reference product (Victoza(®)) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. Methods: This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study (CTR20192342) was conducted in thirty-eight healthy adult male subjects. Volunteers were randomized 1:1 at the beginning to receive a single 0.6 mg dose of Victoza(®) or LRG201902 by subcutaneous injection during the first period. Following 8 days washout period, all subjects received the alternate formulation during the second period. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h after administration. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were AUC(0–t), AUC(0–∞), and C(max). Pharmacokinetic similarity was achieved if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of AUC0-t, AUC(0–∞), and C(max) were within the range of 80–125%. Other pharmacokinetic parameters including T(max), t(½), and λ(z) were also measured. Safety profile and immunogenicity data were collected from each subject. Results: C(max), AUC(0–t), and AUC(0–∞) were similar between the two groups. GMRs of Cmax, AUC(0–t), and AUC(0–∞) were 113.50%, 107.21%, and 106.97% between LRG201902 and Victoza(®) respectively. The 90% CIs for the GMRs of C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0–∞) were all within the PK equivalence criteria. Mean serum concentration-time profiles, secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (T(max), t(½), and λ(z)) were comparable between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 27.8% and 23.7% subjects in the LRG201902 and Victoza(®) arms, respectively. All post-dose samples were detected negative for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates pharmacokinetic similarity of LRG201902 to Victoza(®) in healthy subjects. The safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar for the two products. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7878668/ /pubmed/33584289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.610880 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mai, Fan, Li, Zhang, Gan, Huang and Shentu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Mai, Gang Fan, Lianlian Li, Mupeng Zhang, Peiwen Gan, Chunyan Huang, Qian Shentu, Jianzhong A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects |
title | A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects |
title_full | A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects |
title_short | A Randomized Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Potential Biosimilar LRG201902 With Liraglutide (Victoza(®)) in Healthy Male Subjects |
title_sort | randomized phase 1 pharmacokinetic study comparing the potential biosimilar lrg201902 with liraglutide (victoza(®)) in healthy male subjects |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33584289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.610880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maigang arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT fanlianlian arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT limupeng arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT zhangpeiwen arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT ganchunyan arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT huangqian arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT shentujianzhong arandomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT maigang randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT fanlianlian randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT limupeng randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT zhangpeiwen randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT ganchunyan randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT huangqian randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects AT shentujianzhong randomizedphase1pharmacokineticstudycomparingthepotentialbiosimilarlrg201902withliraglutidevictozainhealthymalesubjects |