Cargando…

Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort

The purpose of the current study was to predict intraocular pressure (IOP) using color fundus photography with a deep learning (DL) model, or, systemic variables with a multivariate linear regression model (MLM), along with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO), support...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishii, Kaori, Asaoka, Ryo, Omoto, Takashi, Mitaki, Shingo, Fujino, Yuri, Murata, Hiroshi, Onoda, Keiichi, Nagai, Atsushi, Yamaguchi, Shuhei, Obana, Akira, Tanito, Masaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80839-4
_version_ 1783650395984232448
author Ishii, Kaori
Asaoka, Ryo
Omoto, Takashi
Mitaki, Shingo
Fujino, Yuri
Murata, Hiroshi
Onoda, Keiichi
Nagai, Atsushi
Yamaguchi, Shuhei
Obana, Akira
Tanito, Masaki
author_facet Ishii, Kaori
Asaoka, Ryo
Omoto, Takashi
Mitaki, Shingo
Fujino, Yuri
Murata, Hiroshi
Onoda, Keiichi
Nagai, Atsushi
Yamaguchi, Shuhei
Obana, Akira
Tanito, Masaki
author_sort Ishii, Kaori
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the current study was to predict intraocular pressure (IOP) using color fundus photography with a deep learning (DL) model, or, systemic variables with a multivariate linear regression model (MLM), along with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO), support vector machine (SVM), and Random Forest: (RF). Training dataset included 3883 examinations from 3883 eyes of 1945 subjects and testing dataset 289 examinations from 289 eyes from 146 subjects. With the training dataset, MLM was constructed to predict IOP using 35 systemic variables and 25 blood measurements. A DL model was developed to predict IOP from color fundus photographs. The prediction accuracy of each model was evaluated through the absolute error and the marginal R-squared (mR(2)), using the testing dataset. The mean absolute error with MLM was 2.29 mmHg, which was significantly smaller than that with DL (2.70 dB). The mR(2) with MLM was 0.15, whereas that with DL was 0.0066. The mean absolute error (between 2.24 and 2.30 mmHg) and mR(2) (between 0.11 and 0.15) with LASSO, SVM and RF were similar to or poorer than MLM. A DL model to predict IOP using color fundus photography proved far less accurate than MLM using systemic variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7878799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78787992021-02-12 Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort Ishii, Kaori Asaoka, Ryo Omoto, Takashi Mitaki, Shingo Fujino, Yuri Murata, Hiroshi Onoda, Keiichi Nagai, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Shuhei Obana, Akira Tanito, Masaki Sci Rep Article The purpose of the current study was to predict intraocular pressure (IOP) using color fundus photography with a deep learning (DL) model, or, systemic variables with a multivariate linear regression model (MLM), along with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO), support vector machine (SVM), and Random Forest: (RF). Training dataset included 3883 examinations from 3883 eyes of 1945 subjects and testing dataset 289 examinations from 289 eyes from 146 subjects. With the training dataset, MLM was constructed to predict IOP using 35 systemic variables and 25 blood measurements. A DL model was developed to predict IOP from color fundus photographs. The prediction accuracy of each model was evaluated through the absolute error and the marginal R-squared (mR(2)), using the testing dataset. The mean absolute error with MLM was 2.29 mmHg, which was significantly smaller than that with DL (2.70 dB). The mR(2) with MLM was 0.15, whereas that with DL was 0.0066. The mean absolute error (between 2.24 and 2.30 mmHg) and mR(2) (between 0.11 and 0.15) with LASSO, SVM and RF were similar to or poorer than MLM. A DL model to predict IOP using color fundus photography proved far less accurate than MLM using systemic variables. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7878799/ /pubmed/33574359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80839-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ishii, Kaori
Asaoka, Ryo
Omoto, Takashi
Mitaki, Shingo
Fujino, Yuri
Murata, Hiroshi
Onoda, Keiichi
Nagai, Atsushi
Yamaguchi, Shuhei
Obana, Akira
Tanito, Masaki
Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
title Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
title_full Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
title_fullStr Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
title_full_unstemmed Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
title_short Predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
title_sort predicting intraocular pressure using systemic variables or fundus photography with deep learning in a health examination cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7878799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80839-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiikaori predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT asaokaryo predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT omototakashi predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT mitakishingo predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT fujinoyuri predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT muratahiroshi predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT onodakeiichi predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT nagaiatsushi predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT yamaguchishuhei predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT obanaakira predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort
AT tanitomasaki predictingintraocularpressureusingsystemicvariablesorfundusphotographywithdeeplearninginahealthexaminationcohort