Cargando…

Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreotti, Ezequiel T., Ipuchima, Jaqueline R., Cazella, Silvio César, Beria, Pedro, Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres, Silveira, Richard Chuquel, Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0092
_version_ 1783650455154327552
author Andreotti, Ezequiel T.
Ipuchima, Jaqueline R.
Cazella, Silvio César
Beria, Pedro
Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres
Silveira, Richard Chuquel
Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno
author_facet Andreotti, Ezequiel T.
Ipuchima, Jaqueline R.
Cazella, Silvio César
Beria, Pedro
Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres
Silveira, Richard Chuquel
Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno
author_sort Andreotti, Ezequiel T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomena. METHOD: A systematic review was performed using the following Boolean searches: “scale AND suicide,” “evaluation AND suicide,” “questionnaire AND suicide.” The articles retrieved were read and selected by two independent researchers – any discrepancies were addressed by a third researcher. RESULTS: From a total number of 206 articles, 20 instruments were identified as being currently used to assess suicide risk. The two most common were the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) and The Columbia – Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). CONCLUSION: Even though the two scales (BSI and C-SSRS) are the most frequently mentioned and used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk, both instruments present breaches in their structure and there is not yet a single instrument considered to be the gold standard. As a future perspective, there is the urgency of developing a new tool that can widely and completely assess all psychopathological aspects of suicidality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7879069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78790692021-03-02 Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review Andreotti, Ezequiel T. Ipuchima, Jaqueline R. Cazella, Silvio César Beria, Pedro Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres Silveira, Richard Chuquel Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno Trends Psychiatry Psychother Review Article INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomena. METHOD: A systematic review was performed using the following Boolean searches: “scale AND suicide,” “evaluation AND suicide,” “questionnaire AND suicide.” The articles retrieved were read and selected by two independent researchers – any discrepancies were addressed by a third researcher. RESULTS: From a total number of 206 articles, 20 instruments were identified as being currently used to assess suicide risk. The two most common were the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) and The Columbia – Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). CONCLUSION: Even though the two scales (BSI and C-SSRS) are the most frequently mentioned and used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk, both instruments present breaches in their structure and there is not yet a single instrument considered to be the gold standard. As a future perspective, there is the urgency of developing a new tool that can widely and completely assess all psychopathological aspects of suicidality. Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7879069/ /pubmed/32997043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0092 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Andreotti, Ezequiel T.
Ipuchima, Jaqueline R.
Cazella, Silvio César
Beria, Pedro
Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres
Silveira, Richard Chuquel
Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno
Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
title Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
title_full Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
title_fullStr Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
title_short Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
title_sort instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0092
work_keys_str_mv AT andreottiezequielt instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview
AT ipuchimajaqueliner instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview
AT cazellasilviocesar instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview
AT beriapedro instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview
AT bortoncellocristianeflores instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview
AT silveirarichardchuquel instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview
AT ferraoygorarzeno instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview