Cargando…
Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0092 |
_version_ | 1783650455154327552 |
---|---|
author | Andreotti, Ezequiel T. Ipuchima, Jaqueline R. Cazella, Silvio César Beria, Pedro Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres Silveira, Richard Chuquel Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno |
author_facet | Andreotti, Ezequiel T. Ipuchima, Jaqueline R. Cazella, Silvio César Beria, Pedro Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres Silveira, Richard Chuquel Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno |
author_sort | Andreotti, Ezequiel T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomena. METHOD: A systematic review was performed using the following Boolean searches: “scale AND suicide,” “evaluation AND suicide,” “questionnaire AND suicide.” The articles retrieved were read and selected by two independent researchers – any discrepancies were addressed by a third researcher. RESULTS: From a total number of 206 articles, 20 instruments were identified as being currently used to assess suicide risk. The two most common were the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) and The Columbia – Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). CONCLUSION: Even though the two scales (BSI and C-SSRS) are the most frequently mentioned and used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk, both instruments present breaches in their structure and there is not yet a single instrument considered to be the gold standard. As a future perspective, there is the urgency of developing a new tool that can widely and completely assess all psychopathological aspects of suicidality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7879069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78790692021-03-02 Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review Andreotti, Ezequiel T. Ipuchima, Jaqueline R. Cazella, Silvio César Beria, Pedro Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres Silveira, Richard Chuquel Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno Trends Psychiatry Psychother Review Article INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an issue of great severity in public health worldwide. This study aimed to investigate which instruments are most frequently used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk and how accessible such instruments are, as well as to determine the scope of suicide phenomena. METHOD: A systematic review was performed using the following Boolean searches: “scale AND suicide,” “evaluation AND suicide,” “questionnaire AND suicide.” The articles retrieved were read and selected by two independent researchers – any discrepancies were addressed by a third researcher. RESULTS: From a total number of 206 articles, 20 instruments were identified as being currently used to assess suicide risk. The two most common were the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI) and The Columbia – Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). CONCLUSION: Even though the two scales (BSI and C-SSRS) are the most frequently mentioned and used by healthcare professionals to assess suicide risk, both instruments present breaches in their structure and there is not yet a single instrument considered to be the gold standard. As a future perspective, there is the urgency of developing a new tool that can widely and completely assess all psychopathological aspects of suicidality. Associação de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7879069/ /pubmed/32997043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0092 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Andreotti, Ezequiel T. Ipuchima, Jaqueline R. Cazella, Silvio César Beria, Pedro Bortoncello, Cristiane Flôres Silveira, Richard Chuquel Ferrão, Ygor Arzeno Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
title | Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
title_full | Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
title_short | Instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
title_sort | instruments to assess suicide risk: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32997043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreottiezequielt instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview AT ipuchimajaqueliner instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview AT cazellasilviocesar instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview AT beriapedro instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview AT bortoncellocristianeflores instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview AT silveirarichardchuquel instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview AT ferraoygorarzeno instrumentstoassesssuicideriskasystematicreview |