Cargando…

Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study

PURPOSE: The purpose of our pilot study was to assess the effect of augmenting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape on biomechanical parameters including anterior tibial translation, gap formation, and load to failure. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen nonpaired cadaveric knees were diss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Charles, Kahn, Adam, Amirouche, Farid, Beltagi, Amir, Pradhan, Sonia, Koh, Jason L., Athiviraham, Aravind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.016
_version_ 1783650486040133632
author Qin, Charles
Kahn, Adam
Amirouche, Farid
Beltagi, Amir
Pradhan, Sonia
Koh, Jason L.
Athiviraham, Aravind
author_facet Qin, Charles
Kahn, Adam
Amirouche, Farid
Beltagi, Amir
Pradhan, Sonia
Koh, Jason L.
Athiviraham, Aravind
author_sort Qin, Charles
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of our pilot study was to assess the effect of augmenting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape on biomechanical parameters including anterior tibial translation, gap formation, and load to failure. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen nonpaired cadaveric knees were dissected, and baseline anterior-posterior stability of both ACL-intact and -deficient knees was obtained. The specimens were randomized to undergo ACL repair either with or without suture tape reinforcement, and anterior tibial translation, as well as gap formation, was measured after cyclic loading. Finally, all specimens were subjected to a single pullout force to determine maximum load to failure. We performed t test analysis to compare means between groups, and significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: On t test analysis, no statistically significant difference was found regarding anterior tibial translation between the ACL-intact group and either repair group or between the repair group without suture tape augmentation and the repair group with suture tape augmentation. No significant difference in gap formation was detected between the repair groups with and without suture tape augmentation at 100 cycles (1.25 mm vs 1.02 mm, P = .6), 250 cycles (2.87 mm vs 2.12 mm, P = .3), and 500 cycles (4.5 mm vs 4.55 mm, P = .5). The average load to failure of the repairs without suture tape augmentation was not significantly different from that of the repairs with suture tape augmentation (725.9 N vs 725.7 N, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we did not identify a difference between ACL repairs with and without suture tape augmentation regarding anterior tibial translation, gap formation, or maximum load to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment of ACL tears with primary ACL repair is a highly debated topic, and studies such as this study to further our understanding of the biomechanical properties of augmented ACL repairs are important for surgeons when deciding the best treatments for their patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7879211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78792112021-02-18 Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study Qin, Charles Kahn, Adam Amirouche, Farid Beltagi, Amir Pradhan, Sonia Koh, Jason L. Athiviraham, Aravind Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of our pilot study was to assess the effect of augmenting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape on biomechanical parameters including anterior tibial translation, gap formation, and load to failure. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen nonpaired cadaveric knees were dissected, and baseline anterior-posterior stability of both ACL-intact and -deficient knees was obtained. The specimens were randomized to undergo ACL repair either with or without suture tape reinforcement, and anterior tibial translation, as well as gap formation, was measured after cyclic loading. Finally, all specimens were subjected to a single pullout force to determine maximum load to failure. We performed t test analysis to compare means between groups, and significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: On t test analysis, no statistically significant difference was found regarding anterior tibial translation between the ACL-intact group and either repair group or between the repair group without suture tape augmentation and the repair group with suture tape augmentation. No significant difference in gap formation was detected between the repair groups with and without suture tape augmentation at 100 cycles (1.25 mm vs 1.02 mm, P = .6), 250 cycles (2.87 mm vs 2.12 mm, P = .3), and 500 cycles (4.5 mm vs 4.55 mm, P = .5). The average load to failure of the repairs without suture tape augmentation was not significantly different from that of the repairs with suture tape augmentation (725.9 N vs 725.7 N, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we did not identify a difference between ACL repairs with and without suture tape augmentation regarding anterior tibial translation, gap formation, or maximum load to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment of ACL tears with primary ACL repair is a highly debated topic, and studies such as this study to further our understanding of the biomechanical properties of augmented ACL repairs are important for surgeons when deciding the best treatments for their patients. Elsevier 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7879211/ /pubmed/33615270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.016 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Qin, Charles
Kahn, Adam
Amirouche, Farid
Beltagi, Amir
Pradhan, Sonia
Koh, Jason L.
Athiviraham, Aravind
Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study
title Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study
title_full Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study
title_fullStr Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study
title_short Suture Tape Augmentation Has No Effect on Anterior Tibial Translation, Gap Formation, or Load to Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Pilot Study
title_sort suture tape augmentation has no effect on anterior tibial translation, gap formation, or load to failure of anterior cruciate ligament repair: a biomechanical pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.016
work_keys_str_mv AT qincharles suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy
AT kahnadam suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy
AT amirouchefarid suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy
AT beltagiamir suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy
AT pradhansonia suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy
AT kohjasonl suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy
AT athivirahamaravind suturetapeaugmentationhasnoeffectonanteriortibialtranslationgapformationorloadtofailureofanteriorcruciateligamentrepairabiomechanicalpilotstudy