Cargando…
Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Network meta-analysis (NMA) synthesizes direct and indirect evidence on multiple treatments to estimate their relative effectiveness. However, comparisons between disconnected treatments are not possible without making strong assumptions. When studies including multiple doses of the same...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33448252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20983315 |
_version_ | 1783650489079955456 |
---|---|
author | Pedder, Hugo Dias, Sofia Bennetts, Meg Boucher, Martin Welton, Nicky J. |
author_facet | Pedder, Hugo Dias, Sofia Bennetts, Meg Boucher, Martin Welton, Nicky J. |
author_sort | Pedder, Hugo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Network meta-analysis (NMA) synthesizes direct and indirect evidence on multiple treatments to estimate their relative effectiveness. However, comparisons between disconnected treatments are not possible without making strong assumptions. When studies including multiple doses of the same drug are available, model-based NMA (MBNMA) presents a novel solution to this problem by modeling a parametric dose-response relationship within an NMA framework. In this article, we illustrate several scenarios in which dose-response MBNMA can connect and strengthen evidence networks. METHODS: We created illustrative data sets by removing studies or treatments from an NMA of triptans for migraine relief. We fitted MBNMA models with different dose-response relationships. For connected networks, we compared MBNMA estimates with NMA estimates. For disconnected networks, we compared MBNMA estimates with NMA estimates from an “augmented” network connected by adding studies or treatments back into the data set. RESULTS: In connected networks, relative effect estimates from MBNMA were more precise than those from NMA models (ratio of posterior SDs NMA v. MBNMA: median = 1.13; range = 1.04–1.68). In disconnected networks, MBNMA provided estimates for all treatments where NMA could not and were consistent with NMA estimates from augmented networks for 15 of 18 data sets. In the remaining 3 of 18 data sets, a more complex dose-response relationship was required than could be fitted with the available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Where information on multiple doses is available, MBNMA can connect disconnected networks and increase precision while making less strong assumptions than alternative approaches. MBNMA relies on correct specification of the dose-response relationship, which requires sufficient data at different doses to allow reliable estimation. We recommend that systematic reviews for NMA search for and include evidence (including phase II trials) on multiple doses of agents where available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7879230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78792302021-02-22 Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis Pedder, Hugo Dias, Sofia Bennetts, Meg Boucher, Martin Welton, Nicky J. Med Decis Making Original Articles BACKGROUND: Network meta-analysis (NMA) synthesizes direct and indirect evidence on multiple treatments to estimate their relative effectiveness. However, comparisons between disconnected treatments are not possible without making strong assumptions. When studies including multiple doses of the same drug are available, model-based NMA (MBNMA) presents a novel solution to this problem by modeling a parametric dose-response relationship within an NMA framework. In this article, we illustrate several scenarios in which dose-response MBNMA can connect and strengthen evidence networks. METHODS: We created illustrative data sets by removing studies or treatments from an NMA of triptans for migraine relief. We fitted MBNMA models with different dose-response relationships. For connected networks, we compared MBNMA estimates with NMA estimates. For disconnected networks, we compared MBNMA estimates with NMA estimates from an “augmented” network connected by adding studies or treatments back into the data set. RESULTS: In connected networks, relative effect estimates from MBNMA were more precise than those from NMA models (ratio of posterior SDs NMA v. MBNMA: median = 1.13; range = 1.04–1.68). In disconnected networks, MBNMA provided estimates for all treatments where NMA could not and were consistent with NMA estimates from augmented networks for 15 of 18 data sets. In the remaining 3 of 18 data sets, a more complex dose-response relationship was required than could be fitted with the available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Where information on multiple doses is available, MBNMA can connect disconnected networks and increase precision while making less strong assumptions than alternative approaches. MBNMA relies on correct specification of the dose-response relationship, which requires sufficient data at different doses to allow reliable estimation. We recommend that systematic reviews for NMA search for and include evidence (including phase II trials) on multiple doses of agents where available. SAGE Publications 2021-01-15 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7879230/ /pubmed/33448252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20983315 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Pedder, Hugo Dias, Sofia Bennetts, Meg Boucher, Martin Welton, Nicky J. Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Joining the Dots: Linking Disconnected Networks of Evidence Using Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | joining the dots: linking disconnected networks of evidence using dose-response model-based network meta-analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33448252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20983315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedderhugo joiningthedotslinkingdisconnectednetworksofevidenceusingdoseresponsemodelbasednetworkmetaanalysis AT diassofia joiningthedotslinkingdisconnectednetworksofevidenceusingdoseresponsemodelbasednetworkmetaanalysis AT bennettsmeg joiningthedotslinkingdisconnectednetworksofevidenceusingdoseresponsemodelbasednetworkmetaanalysis AT bouchermartin joiningthedotslinkingdisconnectednetworksofevidenceusingdoseresponsemodelbasednetworkmetaanalysis AT weltonnickyj joiningthedotslinkingdisconnectednetworksofevidenceusingdoseresponsemodelbasednetworkmetaanalysis |