Cargando…
Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences
BACKGROUND: In implementation science, vast gaps exist between theoretical and practical knowledge. These gaps prevail in the process of getting from problem analysis to selecting implementation strategies while engaging stakeholders including care users. OBJECTIVE: To describe a process of how to g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33125177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13147 |
_version_ | 1783650536553185280 |
---|---|
author | van Rooijen, Marjolein Lenzen, Stephanie Dalemans, Ruth Beurskens, Anna Moser, Albine |
author_facet | van Rooijen, Marjolein Lenzen, Stephanie Dalemans, Ruth Beurskens, Anna Moser, Albine |
author_sort | van Rooijen, Marjolein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In implementation science, vast gaps exist between theoretical and practical knowledge. These gaps prevail in the process of getting from problem analysis to selecting implementation strategies while engaging stakeholders including care users. OBJECTIVE: To describe a process of how to get from problem analysis to strategy selection, how to engage stakeholders, and to provide insights into stakeholders’ experiences. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The setting was a care organization providing long‐term care to people with acquired brain injuries who are communication vulnerable. Fourteen stakeholders (care users, professionals and researchers) participated. Data were collected by a document review, five interviews and one focus group. Inductive content analysis and deductive framework analysis were applied. INTERVENTION: Stakeholder engagement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A three‐step process model and stakeholders experiences. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We formulated a three‐step process: (a) reaching consensus and prioritizing barriers; (b) categorizing the prioritized barriers and idealization; and (c) composing strategies. Two subthemes continuously played a role in how stakeholders were engaged during the process: communication supportive strategies and continuous contact. The experiences of stakeholder participation resulted in the following themes: stakeholders and their roles, use of co‐creation methods and communication supportive strategies, building relationships, stimulus of stakeholders to engage, sharing power, empowerment of stakeholders, feeling a shared responsibility and learning from one another. We conclude that the inclusion of communication‐vulnerable care users is possible if meetings are prepared, communication‐friendly presentations and reports are used, and relationship building is prioritized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7879541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78795412021-02-18 Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences van Rooijen, Marjolein Lenzen, Stephanie Dalemans, Ruth Beurskens, Anna Moser, Albine Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: In implementation science, vast gaps exist between theoretical and practical knowledge. These gaps prevail in the process of getting from problem analysis to selecting implementation strategies while engaging stakeholders including care users. OBJECTIVE: To describe a process of how to get from problem analysis to strategy selection, how to engage stakeholders, and to provide insights into stakeholders’ experiences. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The setting was a care organization providing long‐term care to people with acquired brain injuries who are communication vulnerable. Fourteen stakeholders (care users, professionals and researchers) participated. Data were collected by a document review, five interviews and one focus group. Inductive content analysis and deductive framework analysis were applied. INTERVENTION: Stakeholder engagement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A three‐step process model and stakeholders experiences. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We formulated a three‐step process: (a) reaching consensus and prioritizing barriers; (b) categorizing the prioritized barriers and idealization; and (c) composing strategies. Two subthemes continuously played a role in how stakeholders were engaged during the process: communication supportive strategies and continuous contact. The experiences of stakeholder participation resulted in the following themes: stakeholders and their roles, use of co‐creation methods and communication supportive strategies, building relationships, stimulus of stakeholders to engage, sharing power, empowerment of stakeholders, feeling a shared responsibility and learning from one another. We conclude that the inclusion of communication‐vulnerable care users is possible if meetings are prepared, communication‐friendly presentations and reports are used, and relationship building is prioritized. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-30 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7879541/ /pubmed/33125177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13147 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Papers van Rooijen, Marjolein Lenzen, Stephanie Dalemans, Ruth Beurskens, Anna Moser, Albine Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences |
title | Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences |
title_full | Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences |
title_fullStr | Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences |
title_short | Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: A qualitative study on the process and experiences |
title_sort | stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient‐reported experience measure in disability care: a qualitative study on the process and experiences |
topic | Original Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33125177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanrooijenmarjolein stakeholderengagementfromproblemanalysistoimplementationstrategiesforapatientreportedexperiencemeasureindisabilitycareaqualitativestudyontheprocessandexperiences AT lenzenstephanie stakeholderengagementfromproblemanalysistoimplementationstrategiesforapatientreportedexperiencemeasureindisabilitycareaqualitativestudyontheprocessandexperiences AT dalemansruth stakeholderengagementfromproblemanalysistoimplementationstrategiesforapatientreportedexperiencemeasureindisabilitycareaqualitativestudyontheprocessandexperiences AT beurskensanna stakeholderengagementfromproblemanalysistoimplementationstrategiesforapatientreportedexperiencemeasureindisabilitycareaqualitativestudyontheprocessandexperiences AT moseralbine stakeholderengagementfromproblemanalysistoimplementationstrategiesforapatientreportedexperiencemeasureindisabilitycareaqualitativestudyontheprocessandexperiences |