Cargando…

Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions

BACKGROUND: Dementia can have a profound impact on decision making. People living with dementia (PLwD) often need to make decisions about health care, and, as dementia progresses, decisions may need to be made on their behalf. Specific interventions may support this process. REVIEW QUESTION: What in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geddis‐Regan, Andrew, Errington, Linda, Abley, Clare, Wassall, Rebecca, Exley, Catherine, Thomson, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13167
_version_ 1783650539365466112
author Geddis‐Regan, Andrew
Errington, Linda
Abley, Clare
Wassall, Rebecca
Exley, Catherine
Thomson, Richard
author_facet Geddis‐Regan, Andrew
Errington, Linda
Abley, Clare
Wassall, Rebecca
Exley, Catherine
Thomson, Richard
author_sort Geddis‐Regan, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dementia can have a profound impact on decision making. People living with dementia (PLwD) often need to make decisions about health care, and, as dementia progresses, decisions may need to be made on their behalf. Specific interventions may support this process. REVIEW QUESTION: What interventions are effective in improving shared decision making or surrogate decision making on the health care of PLwD? METHODS: A narrative systematic review of existing literature was conducted. Seven databases, grey literature and key journals were searched. After exclusion by title, abstracts then full texts were reviewed collaboratively to manage any disagreements. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Two articles, including one RCT, evaluated decision aids regarding the use of enteral feeding in advanced dementia. Six further articles, including five RCTs, were found which evaluated the effectiveness of interventions supporting patients or carers with advance care planning. CONCLUSION: Decision‐making interventions typically consist of multiple components which aim to establish preferences for future health care. Advance care planning interventions supported aspects of the decision‐making processes but their impact on decision quality was rarely evaluated. Interventions did not increase the concordance of decisions with a person's values. The decision‐specific interventions are unlikely to produce benefit in other decision contexts. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: Two caregivers, a public stakeholder group and a carer group were consulted in the design of the wider study to which this review relates. Six PLwD refined the research questions addressed in this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7879553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78795532021-02-18 Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions Geddis‐Regan, Andrew Errington, Linda Abley, Clare Wassall, Rebecca Exley, Catherine Thomson, Richard Health Expect Review Articles BACKGROUND: Dementia can have a profound impact on decision making. People living with dementia (PLwD) often need to make decisions about health care, and, as dementia progresses, decisions may need to be made on their behalf. Specific interventions may support this process. REVIEW QUESTION: What interventions are effective in improving shared decision making or surrogate decision making on the health care of PLwD? METHODS: A narrative systematic review of existing literature was conducted. Seven databases, grey literature and key journals were searched. After exclusion by title, abstracts then full texts were reviewed collaboratively to manage any disagreements. RESULTS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Two articles, including one RCT, evaluated decision aids regarding the use of enteral feeding in advanced dementia. Six further articles, including five RCTs, were found which evaluated the effectiveness of interventions supporting patients or carers with advance care planning. CONCLUSION: Decision‐making interventions typically consist of multiple components which aim to establish preferences for future health care. Advance care planning interventions supported aspects of the decision‐making processes but their impact on decision quality was rarely evaluated. Interventions did not increase the concordance of decisions with a person's values. The decision‐specific interventions are unlikely to produce benefit in other decision contexts. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: Two caregivers, a public stakeholder group and a carer group were consulted in the design of the wider study to which this review relates. Six PLwD refined the research questions addressed in this paper. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-28 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7879553/ /pubmed/33248009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13167 Text en © 2020 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Geddis‐Regan, Andrew
Errington, Linda
Abley, Clare
Wassall, Rebecca
Exley, Catherine
Thomson, Richard
Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
title Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
title_full Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
title_fullStr Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
title_short Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
title_sort enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33248009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13167
work_keys_str_mv AT geddisreganandrew enhancingsharedandsurrogatedecisionmakingforpeoplelivingwithdementiaasystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofinterventions
AT erringtonlinda enhancingsharedandsurrogatedecisionmakingforpeoplelivingwithdementiaasystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofinterventions
AT ableyclare enhancingsharedandsurrogatedecisionmakingforpeoplelivingwithdementiaasystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofinterventions
AT wassallrebecca enhancingsharedandsurrogatedecisionmakingforpeoplelivingwithdementiaasystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofinterventions
AT exleycatherine enhancingsharedandsurrogatedecisionmakingforpeoplelivingwithdementiaasystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofinterventions
AT thomsonrichard enhancingsharedandsurrogatedecisionmakingforpeoplelivingwithdementiaasystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofinterventions