Cargando…
There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the completeness of reporting abstracts of systematic reviews (SRs) before and after the publication of the PRISMA-A checklist in 2013 and to assess if an association exists between abstract characteristics and the completeness of reporting. METHODS: A systematic search of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01223-y |
_version_ | 1783650565360713728 |
---|---|
author | Adobes Martin, Milagros Santamans Faustino, Sala Llario Almiñana, Inmaculada Aiuto, Riccardo Rotundo, Roberto Garcovich, Daniele |
author_facet | Adobes Martin, Milagros Santamans Faustino, Sala Llario Almiñana, Inmaculada Aiuto, Riccardo Rotundo, Roberto Garcovich, Daniele |
author_sort | Adobes Martin, Milagros |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the completeness of reporting abstracts of systematic reviews (SRs) before and after the publication of the PRISMA-A checklist in 2013 and to assess if an association exists between abstract characteristics and the completeness of reporting. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases in March 2020. The search focused on the SRs of evaluations of interventions published since 2002 in the field of periodontology. The abstracts of the selected SRs were divided into two groups before and after publication of the PRISMA-A checklist in 2013, and compliance with the 12 items reported in the checklist was evaluated by three calibrated evaluators. RESULTS: A set of 265 abstracts was included in the study. The total score before (mean score, 53.78%; 95% CI, 51.56–55.90%) and after (mean score, 56.88%; 95% CI, 55.39–58.44%) the publication of the PRISMA-A statement exhibited a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.012*). Nevertheless, only the checklist items included studies and synthesis of the results displayed a statistically significant change after guideline publication. The total PRISMA-A score was higher in the meta-analysis group and in articles authored by more than four authors. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the PRISMA-A was statistically significant, but the majority of the items did not improve after its introduction. The editors and referees of periodontal journals should promote adherence to the checklist to improve the quality of the reports and provide readers with better insight into the characteristics of published studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01223-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7879697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78796972021-02-17 There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology Adobes Martin, Milagros Santamans Faustino, Sala Llario Almiñana, Inmaculada Aiuto, Riccardo Rotundo, Roberto Garcovich, Daniele BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the completeness of reporting abstracts of systematic reviews (SRs) before and after the publication of the PRISMA-A checklist in 2013 and to assess if an association exists between abstract characteristics and the completeness of reporting. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases in March 2020. The search focused on the SRs of evaluations of interventions published since 2002 in the field of periodontology. The abstracts of the selected SRs were divided into two groups before and after publication of the PRISMA-A checklist in 2013, and compliance with the 12 items reported in the checklist was evaluated by three calibrated evaluators. RESULTS: A set of 265 abstracts was included in the study. The total score before (mean score, 53.78%; 95% CI, 51.56–55.90%) and after (mean score, 56.88%; 95% CI, 55.39–58.44%) the publication of the PRISMA-A statement exhibited a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.012*). Nevertheless, only the checklist items included studies and synthesis of the results displayed a statistically significant change after guideline publication. The total PRISMA-A score was higher in the meta-analysis group and in articles authored by more than four authors. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the PRISMA-A was statistically significant, but the majority of the items did not improve after its introduction. The editors and referees of periodontal journals should promote adherence to the checklist to improve the quality of the reports and provide readers with better insight into the characteristics of published studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01223-y. BioMed Central 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7879697/ /pubmed/33573591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01223-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Adobes Martin, Milagros Santamans Faustino, Sala Llario Almiñana, Inmaculada Aiuto, Riccardo Rotundo, Roberto Garcovich, Daniele There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
title | There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
title_full | There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
title_fullStr | There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
title_full_unstemmed | There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
title_short | There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
title_sort | there is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the prisma-a checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33573591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01223-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adobesmartinmilagros thereisstillroomforimprovementinthecompletenessofabstractreportingaccordingtotheprismaachecklistacrosssectionalstudyonsystematicreviewsinperiodontology AT santamansfaustinosala thereisstillroomforimprovementinthecompletenessofabstractreportingaccordingtotheprismaachecklistacrosssectionalstudyonsystematicreviewsinperiodontology AT llarioalminanainmaculada thereisstillroomforimprovementinthecompletenessofabstractreportingaccordingtotheprismaachecklistacrosssectionalstudyonsystematicreviewsinperiodontology AT aiutoriccardo thereisstillroomforimprovementinthecompletenessofabstractreportingaccordingtotheprismaachecklistacrosssectionalstudyonsystematicreviewsinperiodontology AT rotundoroberto thereisstillroomforimprovementinthecompletenessofabstractreportingaccordingtotheprismaachecklistacrosssectionalstudyonsystematicreviewsinperiodontology AT garcovichdaniele thereisstillroomforimprovementinthecompletenessofabstractreportingaccordingtotheprismaachecklistacrosssectionalstudyonsystematicreviewsinperiodontology |