Cargando…

Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

BACKGROUND: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a major reproductive health issue, affecting 2%–5% of couples. Genetic factors, mainly chromosomal abnormalities, are the most common cause of early miscarriage accounting for 50%–60% of first trimester abortion. AIM: To estimate the prevalence and natur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elhady, Ghada Mohamed, Kholeif, Soha, Nazmy, Nahla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627985
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_11_20
_version_ 1783650592791461888
author Elhady, Ghada Mohamed
Kholeif, Soha
Nazmy, Nahla
author_facet Elhady, Ghada Mohamed
Kholeif, Soha
Nazmy, Nahla
author_sort Elhady, Ghada Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a major reproductive health issue, affecting 2%–5% of couples. Genetic factors, mainly chromosomal abnormalities, are the most common cause of early miscarriage accounting for 50%–60% of first trimester abortion. AIM: To estimate the prevalence and nature of chromosomal anomalies in couples with recurrent miscarriage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 224 couples with a history of 2 or more abortions. Both partners were karyotyped as part of the primary investigation. Cytogenetic analysis was carried out using the standard method. RESULTS: A total of 224 couples with a history of two or more recurrent abortions were enrolled in this study. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 26 couples (11.6%) and 28 individuals (6.25%). We found a structural chromosome abnormality in 17/28 patients (60.7%); 12 patients had a reciprocal translocation (42.9%) including one patient with an additional inversion of the Y chromosome, 4 (14.3%) had a Robertsonian translocation, and one patient (3.6%) carried a paracentric inversion of chromosome 2. Numerical chromosome aberrations were detected in 5 patients; three patients (10.7%) with sex chromosome abnormalities and two (7.1%) with a marker chromosome. Six patients (21.4%) showed a heteromorphic variant involving chromosome 9. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with RPL is within the range reported worldwide. Cytogenetic analysis should become an integral part of the investigations of couples with at least two pregnancy losses of undetermined etiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7879846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78798462021-02-23 Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Elhady, Ghada Mohamed Kholeif, Soha Nazmy, Nahla J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a major reproductive health issue, affecting 2%–5% of couples. Genetic factors, mainly chromosomal abnormalities, are the most common cause of early miscarriage accounting for 50%–60% of first trimester abortion. AIM: To estimate the prevalence and nature of chromosomal anomalies in couples with recurrent miscarriage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 224 couples with a history of 2 or more abortions. Both partners were karyotyped as part of the primary investigation. Cytogenetic analysis was carried out using the standard method. RESULTS: A total of 224 couples with a history of two or more recurrent abortions were enrolled in this study. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 26 couples (11.6%) and 28 individuals (6.25%). We found a structural chromosome abnormality in 17/28 patients (60.7%); 12 patients had a reciprocal translocation (42.9%) including one patient with an additional inversion of the Y chromosome, 4 (14.3%) had a Robertsonian translocation, and one patient (3.6%) carried a paracentric inversion of chromosome 2. Numerical chromosome aberrations were detected in 5 patients; three patients (10.7%) with sex chromosome abnormalities and two (7.1%) with a marker chromosome. Six patients (21.4%) showed a heteromorphic variant involving chromosome 9. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with RPL is within the range reported worldwide. Cytogenetic analysis should become an integral part of the investigations of couples with at least two pregnancy losses of undetermined etiology. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7879846/ /pubmed/33627985 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_11_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Elhady, Ghada Mohamed
Kholeif, Soha
Nazmy, Nahla
Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_full Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_fullStr Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_full_unstemmed Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_short Chromosomal Aberrations in 224 Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
title_sort chromosomal aberrations in 224 couples with recurrent pregnancy loss
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627985
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_11_20
work_keys_str_mv AT elhadyghadamohamed chromosomalaberrationsin224coupleswithrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT kholeifsoha chromosomalaberrationsin224coupleswithrecurrentpregnancyloss
AT nazmynahla chromosomalaberrationsin224coupleswithrecurrentpregnancyloss