Cargando…

Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study

INTRODUCTION: Discrepancies have been reported in grading of severity of aortic stenosis. We propose to compare Aortic valve area by continuity equation, Dimensionless Index and Acceleration time/Ejection time in patients with documented severe aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular function b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nanditha, S, Malik, Vishwas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109798
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_135_19
_version_ 1783650601193701376
author Nanditha, S
Malik, Vishwas
author_facet Nanditha, S
Malik, Vishwas
author_sort Nanditha, S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Discrepancies have been reported in grading of severity of aortic stenosis. We propose to compare Aortic valve area by continuity equation, Dimensionless Index and Acceleration time/Ejection time in patients with documented severe aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular function by TEE after induction of anesthesia. This might give use insight about the best parameter we can rely on intra-operatively for decision making. METHODOLOGY: 60 patients with severe AS undergoing elective cardiac surgery were enrolled in our study. Post intubation trans-thoracic echocardiography (TEE) was performed and above mentioned parameters was noted. RESULTS: 96.7 % of patients continued in severe AS category when AS was measured using AVA as echo parameter. So there is 3.3 % disparity. There was disparity in 13.3% of cases when DI was considered. And there was 43.3% disparity when AT/ET was considered. CONCLUSION: Perioperative grading of aortic stenosis continues to be a challenge for cardiac anesthesiologists. Multiple echocardiographic parameters have to be considered. We have found AVA and DI to have less disparity compared to AT/ET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7879882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78798822021-02-23 Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study Nanditha, S Malik, Vishwas Ann Card Anaesth Original Article INTRODUCTION: Discrepancies have been reported in grading of severity of aortic stenosis. We propose to compare Aortic valve area by continuity equation, Dimensionless Index and Acceleration time/Ejection time in patients with documented severe aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular function by TEE after induction of anesthesia. This might give use insight about the best parameter we can rely on intra-operatively for decision making. METHODOLOGY: 60 patients with severe AS undergoing elective cardiac surgery were enrolled in our study. Post intubation trans-thoracic echocardiography (TEE) was performed and above mentioned parameters was noted. RESULTS: 96.7 % of patients continued in severe AS category when AS was measured using AVA as echo parameter. So there is 3.3 % disparity. There was disparity in 13.3% of cases when DI was considered. And there was 43.3% disparity when AT/ET was considered. CONCLUSION: Perioperative grading of aortic stenosis continues to be a challenge for cardiac anesthesiologists. Multiple echocardiographic parameters have to be considered. We have found AVA and DI to have less disparity compared to AT/ET. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7879882/ /pubmed/33109798 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_135_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nanditha, S
Malik, Vishwas
Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study
title Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Comparison of Flow-Independent Parameters for Grading Severity of Aortic Stenosis Using Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography – A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort comparison of flow-independent parameters for grading severity of aortic stenosis using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography – a prospective observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33109798
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_135_19
work_keys_str_mv AT nandithas comparisonofflowindependentparametersforgradingseverityofaorticstenosisusingintraoperativetransesophagealechocardiographyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT malikvishwas comparisonofflowindependentparametersforgradingseverityofaorticstenosisusingintraoperativetransesophagealechocardiographyaprospectiveobservationalstudy