Cargando…

Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities

BACKGROUND: The use of wrist worn wearable fitness trackers has been growing rapidly over the last decade. The growing popularity can be partly attributed to the improvements in technology, making activity trackers more affordable, comfortable and convenient for use in different fitness and environm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shumate, Tricia, Link, Magdalen, Furness, James, Kemp-Smith, Kevin, Simas, Vini, Climstein, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33614295
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10893
_version_ 1783650613954871296
author Shumate, Tricia
Link, Magdalen
Furness, James
Kemp-Smith, Kevin
Simas, Vini
Climstein, Mike
author_facet Shumate, Tricia
Link, Magdalen
Furness, James
Kemp-Smith, Kevin
Simas, Vini
Climstein, Mike
author_sort Shumate, Tricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of wrist worn wearable fitness trackers has been growing rapidly over the last decade. The growing popularity can be partly attributed to the improvements in technology, making activity trackers more affordable, comfortable and convenient for use in different fitness and environmental applications. Fitness trackers typically monitor activity level, track steps, distance, heart rate (HR), sleep, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and more, as the technology continuously is advancing. In terms of measuring HR, photoplethysmography (PPG) is a relatively new technology utilised in wearables. PPG estimates HR through an optical technique that monitors changes in blood volume beneath the skin. With these new products becoming available it is important that the validity of these devices be evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Polar Vantage M (PVM) watch to measure HR compared to medical grade ECG on a healthy population during a range of treadmill exercise intensities. METHODS: A total of 30 healthy participants (n = 17 males, n = 13 females) were recruited for this study. The validity of the PVM watch to measure HR was compared against the gold standard 5-lead ECG. The study was conducted on 2 separate testing days with 24–48 h between sessions. Participants completed the Bruce Treadmill Protocol, and HR was measured every 30 s. Validation of the PVM watch in comparison to the ECG was measured with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and levels of agreement were identified with Bland–Altman plots with 90% limits of agreement. Linear regression analysis was performed to calculate the value of r(2) computing the variation of HR obtained by the PVM watch and ECG. RESULTS: In total, 30 participants completed the protocol, with data from 28 participants utilised for statistical analysis (16 males, 14 females, 26.10 ± 3.39 years, height 52.36 m ± 7.40 cm, mass 73.59 ± 11.90 kg). A strong and significant correlation was found between the PVM watch and ECG, demonstrating good criterion validity (p < 0.05, r(2) = 0.87). Good validity was seen for day 1 and day 2 for stage 0 (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI [0.63–0.92], ICC = 0.74; 95% CI [0.37–0.88]), stage 1 (ICC = 0.78; 95% CI [0.52–0.90], ICC = 0.88; 95% CI [0.74–0.95]), and stage 2 (ICC = 0.88; 95% CI [0.73–0.94], ICC = 0.80; 95% CI [0.40–0.92]). Poor validity was demonstrated on day 1 and day 2 for stages 3–5 (ICC < 0.50). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the PVM watch had a strong correlation with the ECG throughout the entire Bruce Protocol, however the level of agreement (LoA) becomes widely dispersed as exercise intensities increased. Due to the large LoA between the ECG and PVM watch, it is not advisable to use this device in clinical populations in which accurate HR measures are essential for patient safety; however, the watch maybe used in settings where less accurate HR is not critical to an individual’s safety while exercising.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7879937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78799372021-02-18 Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities Shumate, Tricia Link, Magdalen Furness, James Kemp-Smith, Kevin Simas, Vini Climstein, Mike PeerJ Cardiology BACKGROUND: The use of wrist worn wearable fitness trackers has been growing rapidly over the last decade. The growing popularity can be partly attributed to the improvements in technology, making activity trackers more affordable, comfortable and convenient for use in different fitness and environmental applications. Fitness trackers typically monitor activity level, track steps, distance, heart rate (HR), sleep, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and more, as the technology continuously is advancing. In terms of measuring HR, photoplethysmography (PPG) is a relatively new technology utilised in wearables. PPG estimates HR through an optical technique that monitors changes in blood volume beneath the skin. With these new products becoming available it is important that the validity of these devices be evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Polar Vantage M (PVM) watch to measure HR compared to medical grade ECG on a healthy population during a range of treadmill exercise intensities. METHODS: A total of 30 healthy participants (n = 17 males, n = 13 females) were recruited for this study. The validity of the PVM watch to measure HR was compared against the gold standard 5-lead ECG. The study was conducted on 2 separate testing days with 24–48 h between sessions. Participants completed the Bruce Treadmill Protocol, and HR was measured every 30 s. Validation of the PVM watch in comparison to the ECG was measured with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and levels of agreement were identified with Bland–Altman plots with 90% limits of agreement. Linear regression analysis was performed to calculate the value of r(2) computing the variation of HR obtained by the PVM watch and ECG. RESULTS: In total, 30 participants completed the protocol, with data from 28 participants utilised for statistical analysis (16 males, 14 females, 26.10 ± 3.39 years, height 52.36 m ± 7.40 cm, mass 73.59 ± 11.90 kg). A strong and significant correlation was found between the PVM watch and ECG, demonstrating good criterion validity (p < 0.05, r(2) = 0.87). Good validity was seen for day 1 and day 2 for stage 0 (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI [0.63–0.92], ICC = 0.74; 95% CI [0.37–0.88]), stage 1 (ICC = 0.78; 95% CI [0.52–0.90], ICC = 0.88; 95% CI [0.74–0.95]), and stage 2 (ICC = 0.88; 95% CI [0.73–0.94], ICC = 0.80; 95% CI [0.40–0.92]). Poor validity was demonstrated on day 1 and day 2 for stages 3–5 (ICC < 0.50). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the PVM watch had a strong correlation with the ECG throughout the entire Bruce Protocol, however the level of agreement (LoA) becomes widely dispersed as exercise intensities increased. Due to the large LoA between the ECG and PVM watch, it is not advisable to use this device in clinical populations in which accurate HR measures are essential for patient safety; however, the watch maybe used in settings where less accurate HR is not critical to an individual’s safety while exercising. PeerJ Inc. 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7879937/ /pubmed/33614295 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10893 Text en © 2021 Shumate et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Cardiology
Shumate, Tricia
Link, Magdalen
Furness, James
Kemp-Smith, Kevin
Simas, Vini
Climstein, Mike
Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
title Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
title_full Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
title_fullStr Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
title_short Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
title_sort validity of the polar vantage m watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities
topic Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33614295
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10893
work_keys_str_mv AT shumatetricia validityofthepolarvantagemwatchwhenmeasuringheartrateatdifferentexerciseintensities
AT linkmagdalen validityofthepolarvantagemwatchwhenmeasuringheartrateatdifferentexerciseintensities
AT furnessjames validityofthepolarvantagemwatchwhenmeasuringheartrateatdifferentexerciseintensities
AT kempsmithkevin validityofthepolarvantagemwatchwhenmeasuringheartrateatdifferentexerciseintensities
AT simasvini validityofthepolarvantagemwatchwhenmeasuringheartrateatdifferentexerciseintensities
AT climsteinmike validityofthepolarvantagemwatchwhenmeasuringheartrateatdifferentexerciseintensities