Cargando…

Evaluation of gingival and periodontal status in obese and non-obese type II diabetic patients – a cross sectional study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival and periodontal status in obese and non-obese type II Diabetic Patients. METHODS: The study population comprised of 75 subjects visiting the outpatient department of our institution, divided into three different groups, group 1 (obese diabeti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SriChinthu, Kenniyan Kumar, Pavithra, Velusamy, Kumar, G.S., Prasad, Harikrishnan, Prema, Perumal, Yoithapprabhunath, Thuckanickenpalayam Ragunathan, Rangarajan, Nagarajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33629055
http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1686
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate gingival and periodontal status in obese and non-obese type II Diabetic Patients. METHODS: The study population comprised of 75 subjects visiting the outpatient department of our institution, divided into three different groups, group 1 (obese diabetic), group 2 (non-obese diabetic), and group 3 (obese, non-diabetic). Diabetic status was assessed with HbA1c values and obesity status was assessed by body mass index (BMI) score greater than or equal to 30 kg/m(2). Gingival and periodontal status were assessed using the Gingival Index (GI) and Community Periodontal Index (CPI) respectively. RESULTS: The mean gingival index score in group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 1.58, 1.54, and 1.25, respectively. Gingival status was poor among obese and non-obese diabetic subjects (Groups 1 and 2) when compared with obese non-diabetic patients (Group 3). The periodontal status showed that periodontal pockets were increased in diabetic obese group (15.4%), followed by diabetic non obese (4.66%), and non-diabetic obese (2%) group respectively and loss of attachment was severe in diabetic obese group (60.7%), followed by diabetic non obese (45.9%) and non-diabetic obese (15.3%) respectively. CONCLUSION: Gingival and periodontal status was poor in the obese diabetic group compared to non-obese diabetic and obese non diabetic group. Hence, the risk of gingivitis and periodontitis in obese diabetic patients should be addressed earlier to prevent further complications and achieve a good oral health status.