Cargando…

Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)

OBJECTIVE: Intraocular lens (IOL) opacification may cause severe visual impairment. The pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse opacification patterns in different IOLs. Therefore, this multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Ludwig-Maximilians-Uni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mackert, Marc, Muth, Daniel Rudolf, Vounotrypidis, Efstathios, Deger, Constanze, Goldblum, David, Shajari, Mehdi, Hasler, Pascal Willy, Priglinger, Siegfried, Wolf, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000589
_version_ 1783650649270910976
author Mackert, Marc
Muth, Daniel Rudolf
Vounotrypidis, Efstathios
Deger, Constanze
Goldblum, David
Shajari, Mehdi
Hasler, Pascal Willy
Priglinger, Siegfried
Wolf, Armin
author_facet Mackert, Marc
Muth, Daniel Rudolf
Vounotrypidis, Efstathios
Deger, Constanze
Goldblum, David
Shajari, Mehdi
Hasler, Pascal Willy
Priglinger, Siegfried
Wolf, Armin
author_sort Mackert, Marc
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intraocular lens (IOL) opacification may cause severe visual impairment. The pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse opacification patterns in different IOLs. Therefore, this multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany and University-Hospital Basel, Switzerland. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, 75 opacified IOLs were identified and classified after extraction. Macroscopical photo documentation, light and electron microscopic analysis were done. RESULTS: 68 acrylic-hydrophilic single-piece-IOLs, 1 acrylic-hydrophilic 3-piece-IOL, 6 acrylic-hydrophobic 3-piece-IOLs were extracted. The dataset comprised IOLs known for opacification and IOLs not having been reported yet. 67 IOLs showed a fine-granular and 8 IOLs a crust-like opacification pattern. According to literature, 62 of the fine-granular opacified IOLs were graded into type 1 (processing/packaging-induced primary opacification) and 13 into type 2 (secondary opacification of unknown aetiology). The anterior surface of the IOLs was affected in all 75 IOLs, the posterior surface only in 23 cases. Of all 67 fine-granular IOLs, 43 had a central defect and 21 had a zone without opacification (clear islet). CONCLUSION: In our series, the morphology of IOL opacification did not follow the existing pathogenetic classification that strictly discriminates between primary and secondary causes. Fine-granular IOL opacification occurs with similar patterns in both type 1 and type 2 IOL opacification, while a crust-like pattern was only detected in type 2 IOL opacifications. Consequently, susceptibility of an IOL to opacification is caused by a multifactorial combination of material and processing properties as well as individual (pathological) conditions of the patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78801122021-02-24 Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL) Mackert, Marc Muth, Daniel Rudolf Vounotrypidis, Efstathios Deger, Constanze Goldblum, David Shajari, Mehdi Hasler, Pascal Willy Priglinger, Siegfried Wolf, Armin BMJ Open Ophthalmol Biomaterials OBJECTIVE: Intraocular lens (IOL) opacification may cause severe visual impairment. The pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse opacification patterns in different IOLs. Therefore, this multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany and University-Hospital Basel, Switzerland. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, 75 opacified IOLs were identified and classified after extraction. Macroscopical photo documentation, light and electron microscopic analysis were done. RESULTS: 68 acrylic-hydrophilic single-piece-IOLs, 1 acrylic-hydrophilic 3-piece-IOL, 6 acrylic-hydrophobic 3-piece-IOLs were extracted. The dataset comprised IOLs known for opacification and IOLs not having been reported yet. 67 IOLs showed a fine-granular and 8 IOLs a crust-like opacification pattern. According to literature, 62 of the fine-granular opacified IOLs were graded into type 1 (processing/packaging-induced primary opacification) and 13 into type 2 (secondary opacification of unknown aetiology). The anterior surface of the IOLs was affected in all 75 IOLs, the posterior surface only in 23 cases. Of all 67 fine-granular IOLs, 43 had a central defect and 21 had a zone without opacification (clear islet). CONCLUSION: In our series, the morphology of IOL opacification did not follow the existing pathogenetic classification that strictly discriminates between primary and secondary causes. Fine-granular IOL opacification occurs with similar patterns in both type 1 and type 2 IOL opacification, while a crust-like pattern was only detected in type 2 IOL opacifications. Consequently, susceptibility of an IOL to opacification is caused by a multifactorial combination of material and processing properties as well as individual (pathological) conditions of the patient. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7880112/ /pubmed/33634210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000589 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Biomaterials
Mackert, Marc
Muth, Daniel Rudolf
Vounotrypidis, Efstathios
Deger, Constanze
Goldblum, David
Shajari, Mehdi
Hasler, Pascal Willy
Priglinger, Siegfried
Wolf, Armin
Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)
title Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)
title_full Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)
title_fullStr Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)
title_short Analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (IOL)
title_sort analysis of opacification patterns in intraocular lenses (iol)
topic Biomaterials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000589
work_keys_str_mv AT mackertmarc analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT muthdanielrudolf analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT vounotrypidisefstathios analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT degerconstanze analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT goldblumdavid analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT shajarimehdi analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT haslerpascalwilly analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT priglingersiegfried analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol
AT wolfarmin analysisofopacificationpatternsinintraocularlensesiol