Cargando…

Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cadel, Lauren, Guilcher, Sara J T, Kokorelias, Kristina Marie, Sutherland, Jason, Glasby, Jon, Kiran, Tara, Kuluski, Kerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044291
_version_ 1783650650902495232
author Cadel, Lauren
Guilcher, Sara J T
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
Sutherland, Jason
Glasby, Jon
Kiran, Tara
Kuluski, Kerry
author_facet Cadel, Lauren
Guilcher, Sara J T
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
Sutherland, Jason
Glasby, Jon
Kiran, Tara
Kuluski, Kerry
author_sort Cadel, Lauren
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge initiatives entailed and identify gaps in the literature in order to inform future work. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Electronic databases and websites of government and healthcare organisations were searched for eligible articles. Articles were required to include an initiative that focused on delayed discharge, involve a hospital setting and be published between 1 January 2004 and 16 August 2019. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Following extraction, a policy framework by Doern and Phidd was adapted to organise the included initiatives into categories: (1) information sharing; (2) tools and guidelines; (3) practice changes; (4) infrastructure and finance and (5) other. RESULTS: Sixty-six articles were included in this review. The majority of initiatives were categorised as practice change (n=36), followed by information sharing (n=19) and tools and guidelines (n=19). Numerous initiatives incorporated multiple categories. The majority of initiatives were implemented by multidisciplinary teams and resulted in improved outcomes such as reduced length of stay and discharge delays. However, the experiences of patients and families were rarely reported. Included initiatives also lacked important contextual information, which is essential for replicating best practices and scaling up. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review identified a number of initiatives that have been implemented to target delayed discharges. While the majority of initiatives resulted in positive outcomes, delayed discharges remain an international problem. There are significant gaps and limitations in evidence and thus, future work is warranted to develop solutions that have a sustainable impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78801192021-02-24 Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review Cadel, Lauren Guilcher, Sara J T Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Sutherland, Jason Glasby, Jon Kiran, Tara Kuluski, Kerry BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge initiatives entailed and identify gaps in the literature in order to inform future work. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Electronic databases and websites of government and healthcare organisations were searched for eligible articles. Articles were required to include an initiative that focused on delayed discharge, involve a hospital setting and be published between 1 January 2004 and 16 August 2019. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Following extraction, a policy framework by Doern and Phidd was adapted to organise the included initiatives into categories: (1) information sharing; (2) tools and guidelines; (3) practice changes; (4) infrastructure and finance and (5) other. RESULTS: Sixty-six articles were included in this review. The majority of initiatives were categorised as practice change (n=36), followed by information sharing (n=19) and tools and guidelines (n=19). Numerous initiatives incorporated multiple categories. The majority of initiatives were implemented by multidisciplinary teams and resulted in improved outcomes such as reduced length of stay and discharge delays. However, the experiences of patients and families were rarely reported. Included initiatives also lacked important contextual information, which is essential for replicating best practices and scaling up. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review identified a number of initiatives that have been implemented to target delayed discharges. While the majority of initiatives resulted in positive outcomes, delayed discharges remain an international problem. There are significant gaps and limitations in evidence and thus, future work is warranted to develop solutions that have a sustainable impact. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7880119/ /pubmed/33574153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044291 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Cadel, Lauren
Guilcher, Sara J T
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
Sutherland, Jason
Glasby, Jon
Kiran, Tara
Kuluski, Kerry
Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
title Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
title_full Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
title_fullStr Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
title_short Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
title_sort initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044291
work_keys_str_mv AT cadellauren initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview
AT guilchersarajt initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview
AT kokoreliaskristinamarie initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview
AT sutherlandjason initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview
AT glasbyjon initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview
AT kirantara initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview
AT kuluskikerry initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview