Cargando…
Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044291 |
_version_ | 1783650650902495232 |
---|---|
author | Cadel, Lauren Guilcher, Sara J T Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Sutherland, Jason Glasby, Jon Kiran, Tara Kuluski, Kerry |
author_facet | Cadel, Lauren Guilcher, Sara J T Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Sutherland, Jason Glasby, Jon Kiran, Tara Kuluski, Kerry |
author_sort | Cadel, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge initiatives entailed and identify gaps in the literature in order to inform future work. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Electronic databases and websites of government and healthcare organisations were searched for eligible articles. Articles were required to include an initiative that focused on delayed discharge, involve a hospital setting and be published between 1 January 2004 and 16 August 2019. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Following extraction, a policy framework by Doern and Phidd was adapted to organise the included initiatives into categories: (1) information sharing; (2) tools and guidelines; (3) practice changes; (4) infrastructure and finance and (5) other. RESULTS: Sixty-six articles were included in this review. The majority of initiatives were categorised as practice change (n=36), followed by information sharing (n=19) and tools and guidelines (n=19). Numerous initiatives incorporated multiple categories. The majority of initiatives were implemented by multidisciplinary teams and resulted in improved outcomes such as reduced length of stay and discharge delays. However, the experiences of patients and families were rarely reported. Included initiatives also lacked important contextual information, which is essential for replicating best practices and scaling up. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review identified a number of initiatives that have been implemented to target delayed discharges. While the majority of initiatives resulted in positive outcomes, delayed discharges remain an international problem. There are significant gaps and limitations in evidence and thus, future work is warranted to develop solutions that have a sustainable impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78801192021-02-24 Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review Cadel, Lauren Guilcher, Sara J T Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Sutherland, Jason Glasby, Jon Kiran, Tara Kuluski, Kerry BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The overarching objective of the scoping review was to examine peer reviewed and grey literature for best practices that have been developed, implemented and/or evaluated for delayed discharge involving a hospital setting. Two specific objectives were to review what the delayed discharge initiatives entailed and identify gaps in the literature in order to inform future work. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: Electronic databases and websites of government and healthcare organisations were searched for eligible articles. Articles were required to include an initiative that focused on delayed discharge, involve a hospital setting and be published between 1 January 2004 and 16 August 2019. Data were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Following extraction, a policy framework by Doern and Phidd was adapted to organise the included initiatives into categories: (1) information sharing; (2) tools and guidelines; (3) practice changes; (4) infrastructure and finance and (5) other. RESULTS: Sixty-six articles were included in this review. The majority of initiatives were categorised as practice change (n=36), followed by information sharing (n=19) and tools and guidelines (n=19). Numerous initiatives incorporated multiple categories. The majority of initiatives were implemented by multidisciplinary teams and resulted in improved outcomes such as reduced length of stay and discharge delays. However, the experiences of patients and families were rarely reported. Included initiatives also lacked important contextual information, which is essential for replicating best practices and scaling up. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review identified a number of initiatives that have been implemented to target delayed discharges. While the majority of initiatives resulted in positive outcomes, delayed discharges remain an international problem. There are significant gaps and limitations in evidence and thus, future work is warranted to develop solutions that have a sustainable impact. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7880119/ /pubmed/33574153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044291 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Cadel, Lauren Guilcher, Sara J T Kokorelias, Kristina Marie Sutherland, Jason Glasby, Jon Kiran, Tara Kuluski, Kerry Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
title | Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
title_full | Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
title_short | Initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
title_sort | initiatives for improving delayed discharge from a hospital setting: a scoping review |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33574153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cadellauren initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview AT guilchersarajt initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview AT kokoreliaskristinamarie initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview AT sutherlandjason initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview AT glasbyjon initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview AT kirantara initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview AT kuluskikerry initiativesforimprovingdelayeddischargefromahospitalsettingascopingreview |