Cargando…

Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress

The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and sup...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dostalek, Miroslav, Fliegel, Karel, Dusek, Ladislav, Lukes, Tomas, Hejda, Jan, Duchackova, Michaela, Hozman, Jiri, Autrata, Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828740
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.4
_version_ 1783650653732601856
author Dostalek, Miroslav
Fliegel, Karel
Dusek, Ladislav
Lukes, Tomas
Hejda, Jan
Duchackova, Michaela
Hozman, Jiri
Autrata, Rudolf
author_facet Dostalek, Miroslav
Fliegel, Karel
Dusek, Ladislav
Lukes, Tomas
Hejda, Jan
Duchackova, Michaela
Hozman, Jiri
Autrata, Rudolf
author_sort Dostalek, Miroslav
collection PubMed
description The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78801362021-04-06 Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress Dostalek, Miroslav Fliegel, Karel Dusek, Ladislav Lukes, Tomas Hejda, Jan Duchackova, Michaela Hozman, Jiri Autrata, Rudolf J Eye Mov Res Research Article The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand. Bern Open Publishing 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7880136/ /pubmed/33828740 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.4 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dostalek, Miroslav
Fliegel, Karel
Dusek, Ladislav
Lukes, Tomas
Hejda, Jan
Duchackova, Michaela
Hozman, Jiri
Autrata, Rudolf
Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
title Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
title_full Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
title_fullStr Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
title_short Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
title_sort influence of artificially generated interocular blur difference on fusion stability under vergence stress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828740
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.4
work_keys_str_mv AT dostalekmiroslav influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT fliegelkarel influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT dusekladislav influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT lukestomas influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT hejdajan influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT duchackovamichaela influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT hozmanjiri influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress
AT autratarudolf influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress