Cargando…
Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress
The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and sup...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bern Open Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828740 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.4 |
_version_ | 1783650653732601856 |
---|---|
author | Dostalek, Miroslav Fliegel, Karel Dusek, Ladislav Lukes, Tomas Hejda, Jan Duchackova, Michaela Hozman, Jiri Autrata, Rudolf |
author_facet | Dostalek, Miroslav Fliegel, Karel Dusek, Ladislav Lukes, Tomas Hejda, Jan Duchackova, Michaela Hozman, Jiri Autrata, Rudolf |
author_sort | Dostalek, Miroslav |
collection | PubMed |
description | The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Bern Open Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78801362021-04-06 Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress Dostalek, Miroslav Fliegel, Karel Dusek, Ladislav Lukes, Tomas Hejda, Jan Duchackova, Michaela Hozman, Jiri Autrata, Rudolf J Eye Mov Res Research Article The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand. Bern Open Publishing 2019-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7880136/ /pubmed/33828740 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.4 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dostalek, Miroslav Fliegel, Karel Dusek, Ladislav Lukes, Tomas Hejda, Jan Duchackova, Michaela Hozman, Jiri Autrata, Rudolf Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress |
title | Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress |
title_full | Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress |
title_fullStr | Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress |
title_short | Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress |
title_sort | influence of artificially generated interocular blur difference on fusion stability under vergence stress |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828740 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dostalekmiroslav influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT fliegelkarel influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT dusekladislav influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT lukestomas influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT hejdajan influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT duchackovamichaela influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT hozmanjiri influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress AT autratarudolf influenceofartificiallygeneratedinterocularblurdifferenceonfusionstabilityundervergencestress |