Cargando…
Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bern Open Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828742 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.10 |
_version_ | 1783650654640668672 |
---|---|
author | Jainta, Stephanie Joss, Joëlle |
author_facet | Jainta, Stephanie Joss, Joëlle |
author_sort | Jainta, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple of years ago, we showed for a small sample (N=13) that binocular advantages critically relate to the individual heterophoria (the resting state of vergence). In the present, large-scale replication we collected binocular eye movements (Eyelink II) for 94 participants who read 20 sentences monocularly and 20 sentences binocularly. Further, individual heterophorias were determined using three different optometric standards: objective eye tracking (EyeLink II at 60 cm), Maddox wing test (at 30 cm) and measures following the “Guidelines for the application of the Measuring and Correcting Methodology after H.-J. Haase” (MCH; at 6 m). Binocular eye movements showed typical pattern and we replicated (1) binocular advantages of about 25 ms for average fixation durations and (2) a reduction in binocular advantages when heterophoria increased – but only when heterophoria was identified by EyeLink II or Maddox wing measures; MCH measures of heterophoria did not affect binocular advantages in reading. For large heterophorias binocular reading even turned into a disadvantage. Implications for effect estimations and optometric testing will be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Bern Open Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78801412021-04-06 Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria Jainta, Stephanie Joss, Joëlle J Eye Mov Res Research Article Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple of years ago, we showed for a small sample (N=13) that binocular advantages critically relate to the individual heterophoria (the resting state of vergence). In the present, large-scale replication we collected binocular eye movements (Eyelink II) for 94 participants who read 20 sentences monocularly and 20 sentences binocularly. Further, individual heterophorias were determined using three different optometric standards: objective eye tracking (EyeLink II at 60 cm), Maddox wing test (at 30 cm) and measures following the “Guidelines for the application of the Measuring and Correcting Methodology after H.-J. Haase” (MCH; at 6 m). Binocular eye movements showed typical pattern and we replicated (1) binocular advantages of about 25 ms for average fixation durations and (2) a reduction in binocular advantages when heterophoria increased – but only when heterophoria was identified by EyeLink II or Maddox wing measures; MCH measures of heterophoria did not affect binocular advantages in reading. For large heterophorias binocular reading even turned into a disadvantage. Implications for effect estimations and optometric testing will be discussed. Bern Open Publishing 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7880141/ /pubmed/33828742 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.10 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jainta, Stephanie Joss, Joëlle Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
title | Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
title_full | Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
title_fullStr | Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
title_full_unstemmed | Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
title_short | Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
title_sort | binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828742 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaintastephanie binocularadvantagesinreadingrevisitedattenuatingeffectsofindividualhorizontalheterophoria AT jossjoelle binocularadvantagesinreadingrevisitedattenuatingeffectsofindividualhorizontalheterophoria |