Cargando…

Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria

Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jainta, Stephanie, Joss, Joëlle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828742
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.10
_version_ 1783650654640668672
author Jainta, Stephanie
Joss, Joëlle
author_facet Jainta, Stephanie
Joss, Joëlle
author_sort Jainta, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple of years ago, we showed for a small sample (N=13) that binocular advantages critically relate to the individual heterophoria (the resting state of vergence). In the present, large-scale replication we collected binocular eye movements (Eyelink II) for 94 participants who read 20 sentences monocularly and 20 sentences binocularly. Further, individual heterophorias were determined using three different optometric standards: objective eye tracking (EyeLink II at 60 cm), Maddox wing test (at 30 cm) and measures following the “Guidelines for the application of the Measuring and Correcting Methodology after H.-J. Haase” (MCH; at 6 m). Binocular eye movements showed typical pattern and we replicated (1) binocular advantages of about 25 ms for average fixation durations and (2) a reduction in binocular advantages when heterophoria increased – but only when heterophoria was identified by EyeLink II or Maddox wing measures; MCH measures of heterophoria did not affect binocular advantages in reading. For large heterophorias binocular reading even turned into a disadvantage. Implications for effect estimations and optometric testing will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78801412021-04-06 Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria Jainta, Stephanie Joss, Joëlle J Eye Mov Res Research Article Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple of years ago, we showed for a small sample (N=13) that binocular advantages critically relate to the individual heterophoria (the resting state of vergence). In the present, large-scale replication we collected binocular eye movements (Eyelink II) for 94 participants who read 20 sentences monocularly and 20 sentences binocularly. Further, individual heterophorias were determined using three different optometric standards: objective eye tracking (EyeLink II at 60 cm), Maddox wing test (at 30 cm) and measures following the “Guidelines for the application of the Measuring and Correcting Methodology after H.-J. Haase” (MCH; at 6 m). Binocular eye movements showed typical pattern and we replicated (1) binocular advantages of about 25 ms for average fixation durations and (2) a reduction in binocular advantages when heterophoria increased – but only when heterophoria was identified by EyeLink II or Maddox wing measures; MCH measures of heterophoria did not affect binocular advantages in reading. For large heterophorias binocular reading even turned into a disadvantage. Implications for effect estimations and optometric testing will be discussed. Bern Open Publishing 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7880141/ /pubmed/33828742 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.10 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jainta, Stephanie
Joss, Joëlle
Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
title Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
title_full Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
title_fullStr Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
title_full_unstemmed Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
title_short Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
title_sort binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828742
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.12.4.10
work_keys_str_mv AT jaintastephanie binocularadvantagesinreadingrevisitedattenuatingeffectsofindividualhorizontalheterophoria
AT jossjoelle binocularadvantagesinreadingrevisitedattenuatingeffectsofindividualhorizontalheterophoria