Cargando…

Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat

Tolerance to the cereal disease Fusarium crown rot (FCR) was investigated in a set of 34 durum wheat genotypes, with Suntop, (bread wheat) and EGA Bellaroi (durum) as tolerant and intolerant controls, in a series of replicated field trials over four years with inoculated (FCR-i) and non-inoculated (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadkol, Gururaj Pralhad, Meza, Jess, Simpfendorfer, Steven, Harden, Steve, Cullis, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33577599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240766
_version_ 1783650702115995648
author Kadkol, Gururaj Pralhad
Meza, Jess
Simpfendorfer, Steven
Harden, Steve
Cullis, Brian
author_facet Kadkol, Gururaj Pralhad
Meza, Jess
Simpfendorfer, Steven
Harden, Steve
Cullis, Brian
author_sort Kadkol, Gururaj Pralhad
collection PubMed
description Tolerance to the cereal disease Fusarium crown rot (FCR) was investigated in a set of 34 durum wheat genotypes, with Suntop, (bread wheat) and EGA Bellaroi (durum) as tolerant and intolerant controls, in a series of replicated field trials over four years with inoculated (FCR-i) and non-inoculated (FCR-n) plots of the genotypes. The genotypes included conventional durum lines and lines derived from crossing durum with 2–49, a bread wheat genotype with the highest level of partial resistance to FCR. A split plot trial design was chosen to optimize the efficiency for the prediction of FCR tolerance for each genotype. A multi-environment trial (MET) analysis was undertaken which indicated that there was good repeatability of FCR tolerance across years. Based on an FCR tolerance index, Suntop was the most tolerant genotype and EGA Bellaroi was very intolerant, but some durum wheats had FCR tolerance indices which were comparable to Suntop. These included some conventional durum genotypes, V101030, TD1702, V11TD013*3X-63 and DBA Bindaroi, as well as genotypes from crosses with 2–49 (V114916 and V114942). The correlation between FCR tolerance and FCR-n yield predictions was moderately negative indicating it could be somewhat difficult to develop FCR-tolerant genotypes that are high yielding under low disease pressure. However, FCR tolerance showed a positive correlation with FCR-i yield predictions in seasons of high disease expression indicating it could be possible to screen for FCR tolerance using only FCR-i treatments. These results are the first demonstration of genetic diversity in durum germplasm for FCR tolerance and they provide a basis for breeding for this trait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78804372021-02-19 Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat Kadkol, Gururaj Pralhad Meza, Jess Simpfendorfer, Steven Harden, Steve Cullis, Brian PLoS One Research Article Tolerance to the cereal disease Fusarium crown rot (FCR) was investigated in a set of 34 durum wheat genotypes, with Suntop, (bread wheat) and EGA Bellaroi (durum) as tolerant and intolerant controls, in a series of replicated field trials over four years with inoculated (FCR-i) and non-inoculated (FCR-n) plots of the genotypes. The genotypes included conventional durum lines and lines derived from crossing durum with 2–49, a bread wheat genotype with the highest level of partial resistance to FCR. A split plot trial design was chosen to optimize the efficiency for the prediction of FCR tolerance for each genotype. A multi-environment trial (MET) analysis was undertaken which indicated that there was good repeatability of FCR tolerance across years. Based on an FCR tolerance index, Suntop was the most tolerant genotype and EGA Bellaroi was very intolerant, but some durum wheats had FCR tolerance indices which were comparable to Suntop. These included some conventional durum genotypes, V101030, TD1702, V11TD013*3X-63 and DBA Bindaroi, as well as genotypes from crosses with 2–49 (V114916 and V114942). The correlation between FCR tolerance and FCR-n yield predictions was moderately negative indicating it could be somewhat difficult to develop FCR-tolerant genotypes that are high yielding under low disease pressure. However, FCR tolerance showed a positive correlation with FCR-i yield predictions in seasons of high disease expression indicating it could be possible to screen for FCR tolerance using only FCR-i treatments. These results are the first demonstration of genetic diversity in durum germplasm for FCR tolerance and they provide a basis for breeding for this trait. Public Library of Science 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7880437/ /pubmed/33577599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240766 Text en © 2021 Kadkol et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kadkol, Gururaj Pralhad
Meza, Jess
Simpfendorfer, Steven
Harden, Steve
Cullis, Brian
Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
title Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
title_full Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
title_fullStr Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
title_full_unstemmed Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
title_short Genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
title_sort genetic variation for fusarium crown rot tolerance in durum wheat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33577599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240766
work_keys_str_mv AT kadkolgururajpralhad geneticvariationforfusariumcrownrottoleranceindurumwheat
AT mezajess geneticvariationforfusariumcrownrottoleranceindurumwheat
AT simpfendorfersteven geneticvariationforfusariumcrownrottoleranceindurumwheat
AT hardensteve geneticvariationforfusariumcrownrottoleranceindurumwheat
AT cullisbrian geneticvariationforfusariumcrownrottoleranceindurumwheat