Cargando…

Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME

With a motivation to immerse students in engineering design, graphics communication, and computer aided design (CAD) skills early-on in the biomedical engineering curriculum, we launched a new 2-unit laboratory course on “Graphics Design in BME” in the Spring 2020 quarter for UC Davis sophomores. Du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Rucha, Ghosh, Sujoy, Simileysky, Alexander, Bhanot, Mayank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43683-021-00046-z
_version_ 1783650721072152576
author Joshi, Rucha
Ghosh, Sujoy
Simileysky, Alexander
Bhanot, Mayank
author_facet Joshi, Rucha
Ghosh, Sujoy
Simileysky, Alexander
Bhanot, Mayank
author_sort Joshi, Rucha
collection PubMed
description With a motivation to immerse students in engineering design, graphics communication, and computer aided design (CAD) skills early-on in the biomedical engineering curriculum, we launched a new 2-unit laboratory course on “Graphics Design in BME” in the Spring 2020 quarter for UC Davis sophomores. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course met with the significant challenge of conversion to an online mode of teaching, instead of planned face-to-face instruction. Providing formative feedback was thought to be an important step to help students succeed in their final CAD project of the course. In the process of designing feedback, we found that the concept of feedback is still fragile in an online learning environment because online learning settings provide distinct pedagogical demands as compared to face-to-face settings. The situation is especially delicate in the context of contemporary higher education imparting engineering skills, where students attend large classes, with diminished opportunities to interact with the teaching staff. The challenge we faced was to provide meaningful dialogic feedback in an online environment, especially while teaching engineering graphics design to a large class. Here we addressed this challenge by focusing on the process of structuring meaningful feedback. We designed a project assignment to be submitted as multiple deliverables to be submitted in two-stages. Then, we characterized its feedback with multiple notions, such as dialogic iterative cycles, personalized, goal-directed, immediate, in written format, and having a peer assessment component. The process of providing formative feedback online through the structure mentioned in this paper resulted in students’ improved scores on the final project elements. It also helped us identify the common issues students are faltering in a graphics design class, and provide customized guidance, ideal examples of expected work, and more resources to motivate each student group to achieve mastery of course content. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-021-00046-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78805232021-02-16 Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME Joshi, Rucha Ghosh, Sujoy Simileysky, Alexander Bhanot, Mayank Biomed Eng Educ Teaching Tips (COVID) With a motivation to immerse students in engineering design, graphics communication, and computer aided design (CAD) skills early-on in the biomedical engineering curriculum, we launched a new 2-unit laboratory course on “Graphics Design in BME” in the Spring 2020 quarter for UC Davis sophomores. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the course met with the significant challenge of conversion to an online mode of teaching, instead of planned face-to-face instruction. Providing formative feedback was thought to be an important step to help students succeed in their final CAD project of the course. In the process of designing feedback, we found that the concept of feedback is still fragile in an online learning environment because online learning settings provide distinct pedagogical demands as compared to face-to-face settings. The situation is especially delicate in the context of contemporary higher education imparting engineering skills, where students attend large classes, with diminished opportunities to interact with the teaching staff. The challenge we faced was to provide meaningful dialogic feedback in an online environment, especially while teaching engineering graphics design to a large class. Here we addressed this challenge by focusing on the process of structuring meaningful feedback. We designed a project assignment to be submitted as multiple deliverables to be submitted in two-stages. Then, we characterized its feedback with multiple notions, such as dialogic iterative cycles, personalized, goal-directed, immediate, in written format, and having a peer assessment component. The process of providing formative feedback online through the structure mentioned in this paper resulted in students’ improved scores on the final project elements. It also helped us identify the common issues students are faltering in a graphics design class, and provide customized guidance, ideal examples of expected work, and more resources to motivate each student group to achieve mastery of course content. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43683-021-00046-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880523/ /pubmed/33615317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43683-021-00046-z Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Teaching Tips (COVID)
Joshi, Rucha
Ghosh, Sujoy
Simileysky, Alexander
Bhanot, Mayank
Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME
title Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME
title_full Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME
title_fullStr Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME
title_full_unstemmed Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME
title_short Structuring Formative Feedback in an Online Graphics Design Course in BME
title_sort structuring formative feedback in an online graphics design course in bme
topic Teaching Tips (COVID)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43683-021-00046-z
work_keys_str_mv AT joshirucha structuringformativefeedbackinanonlinegraphicsdesigncourseinbme
AT ghoshsujoy structuringformativefeedbackinanonlinegraphicsdesigncourseinbme
AT simileyskyalexander structuringformativefeedbackinanonlinegraphicsdesigncourseinbme
AT bhanotmayank structuringformativefeedbackinanonlinegraphicsdesigncourseinbme