Cargando…

Understanding and Advancing Organizational Health Literacy Within a Public Health Setting

BACKGROUND: Organizational health literacy (OHL) within the public health setting is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to form a health literacy (HL) improvement team consisting of university researchers and Virginia Department of Health (VDH) district directors and staff to assess and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kružliaková, Natalie, Porter, Kathleen, Ray, Pamela A., Hedrick, Valisa, Brock, Donna Jean, Zoellner, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33577691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20210114-01
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Organizational health literacy (OHL) within the public health setting is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to form a health literacy (HL) improvement team consisting of university researchers and Virginia Department of Health (VDH) district directors and staff to assess and improve OHL practices of VDH staff in four medically underserved health districts in southwest Virginia. METHODS: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit guided this mixed-methods needs assessment and improvement plan. VDH staff completed a 44-item survey adapted from this Toolkit and a roundtable discussion to indicate their perceptions of current OHL practices. VDH clients completed a survey including seven items measuring perceptions of staff OHL practices and three items measuring subjective HL. KEY RESULTS: About one-half of VDH staff (n = 252, 88% female, average age 49 ± 12 years, 23% ≤ high school education [HS]) reported “doing well” across all OHL domains. Staff survey and roundtable discussion revealed the need to strengthen the written communication domain. Among 185 VDH clients (82% female, average age 33 ± 14 years, 40% ≤ HS), perceptions of staff OHL practices were high, ranging from 3.07 to 3.64 (scale of 1–4). Client HL status was significantly positively correlated (p < .01–.05) with 5 of 7 OHL practices. Findings aided development and initial implementation of an OHL improvement plan, including e-newsletters and in-person workshops. On average, 60% of staff opened quarterly e-newsletters. Staff ratings of the Clear Communication Index workshop were high in terms of utility and applicability of content. CONCLUSIONS: Results reflected notable strengths and weaknesses in current OHL practices from staff and client perspectives, with the greatest need identified in written communication. E-newsletter series and in-person workshops on the Clear Communication Index helped lay groundwork for additional HL improvement activities for VDH staff. Limitations and future recommendations for public health settings are discussed. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(1):e35–e48.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study describes use of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to conduct an organizational health literacy needs assessment and improvement plan in a public health setting, the Virginia Department of Health. Assessment of staff and clients revealed strengths and weaknesses in organizational health literacy practices. Feedback guided efforts to improve organizational health literacy capacity.