Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), coronary CT angiography (CTA), and the combination of both in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with previous corona...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z |
_version_ | 1783650769729224704 |
---|---|
author | Kim, S. H. Rübenthaler, J. Nörenberg, D. Huber, T. Kunz, W. G. Sommer, W. H. Schoenberg, S. O. Janssen, S. Overhoff, D. Froelich, M. F. |
author_facet | Kim, S. H. Rübenthaler, J. Nörenberg, D. Huber, T. Kunz, W. G. Sommer, W. H. Schoenberg, S. O. Janssen, S. Overhoff, D. Froelich, M. F. |
author_sort | Kim, S. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), coronary CT angiography (CTA), and the combination of both in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with previous coronary stent implantation. METHODS: A decision model based on Markov simulations estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with CTA, CTP, and CTA + CTP. Model input parameters were obtained from published literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate overall model uncertainty. A single-variable deterministic sensitivity analysis evaluated the sensitivity of the results to plausible variations in model inputs. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario with willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY, CTA resulted in total costs of $47,013.87 and an expected effectiveness of 6.84 QALYs, whereas CTP resulted in total costs of $46,758.83 with 6.93 QALYs. CTA + CTP reached costs of $47,455.63 with 6.85 QALYs. Therefore, strategies CTA and CTA + CTP were dominated by CTP in the base-case scenario. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated robustness of the model to variations of diagnostic efficacy parameters and costs in a broad range. CTP was cost-effective in the majority of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis as compared with CTA. CONCLUSIONS: CTP is cost-effective for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting and therefore should be considered a feasible approach in daily clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CTP provides added diagnostic value in patients with previous coronary stents. • CTP is a cost-effective method for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78809242021-02-18 Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients Kim, S. H. Rübenthaler, J. Nörenberg, D. Huber, T. Kunz, W. G. Sommer, W. H. Schoenberg, S. O. Janssen, S. Overhoff, D. Froelich, M. F. Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), coronary CT angiography (CTA), and the combination of both in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with previous coronary stent implantation. METHODS: A decision model based on Markov simulations estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with CTA, CTP, and CTA + CTP. Model input parameters were obtained from published literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate overall model uncertainty. A single-variable deterministic sensitivity analysis evaluated the sensitivity of the results to plausible variations in model inputs. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario with willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY, CTA resulted in total costs of $47,013.87 and an expected effectiveness of 6.84 QALYs, whereas CTP resulted in total costs of $46,758.83 with 6.93 QALYs. CTA + CTP reached costs of $47,455.63 with 6.85 QALYs. Therefore, strategies CTA and CTA + CTP were dominated by CTP in the base-case scenario. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated robustness of the model to variations of diagnostic efficacy parameters and costs in a broad range. CTP was cost-effective in the majority of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis as compared with CTA. CONCLUSIONS: CTP is cost-effective for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting and therefore should be considered a feasible approach in daily clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CTP provides added diagnostic value in patients with previous coronary stents. • CTP is a cost-effective method for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880924/ /pubmed/32885295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Computed Tomography Kim, S. H. Rübenthaler, J. Nörenberg, D. Huber, T. Kunz, W. G. Sommer, W. H. Schoenberg, S. O. Janssen, S. Overhoff, D. Froelich, M. F. Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
title | Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of stress ctp versus cta in detecting obstructive cad or in-stent restenosis in stented patients |
topic | Computed Tomography |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsh costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT rubenthalerj costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT norenbergd costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT hubert costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT kunzwg costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT sommerwh costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT schoenbergso costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT janssens costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT overhoffd costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients AT froelichmf costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients |