Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), coronary CT angiography (CTA), and the combination of both in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with previous corona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, S. H., Rübenthaler, J., Nörenberg, D., Huber, T., Kunz, W. G., Sommer, W. H., Schoenberg, S. O., Janssen, S., Overhoff, D., Froelich, M. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z
_version_ 1783650769729224704
author Kim, S. H.
Rübenthaler, J.
Nörenberg, D.
Huber, T.
Kunz, W. G.
Sommer, W. H.
Schoenberg, S. O.
Janssen, S.
Overhoff, D.
Froelich, M. F.
author_facet Kim, S. H.
Rübenthaler, J.
Nörenberg, D.
Huber, T.
Kunz, W. G.
Sommer, W. H.
Schoenberg, S. O.
Janssen, S.
Overhoff, D.
Froelich, M. F.
author_sort Kim, S. H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), coronary CT angiography (CTA), and the combination of both in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with previous coronary stent implantation. METHODS: A decision model based on Markov simulations estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with CTA, CTP, and CTA + CTP. Model input parameters were obtained from published literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate overall model uncertainty. A single-variable deterministic sensitivity analysis evaluated the sensitivity of the results to plausible variations in model inputs. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario with willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY, CTA resulted in total costs of $47,013.87 and an expected effectiveness of 6.84 QALYs, whereas CTP resulted in total costs of $46,758.83 with 6.93 QALYs. CTA + CTP reached costs of $47,455.63 with 6.85 QALYs. Therefore, strategies CTA and CTA + CTP were dominated by CTP in the base-case scenario. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated robustness of the model to variations of diagnostic efficacy parameters and costs in a broad range. CTP was cost-effective in the majority of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis as compared with CTA. CONCLUSIONS: CTP is cost-effective for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting and therefore should be considered a feasible approach in daily clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CTP provides added diagnostic value in patients with previous coronary stents. • CTP is a cost-effective method for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78809242021-02-18 Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients Kim, S. H. Rübenthaler, J. Nörenberg, D. Huber, T. Kunz, W. G. Sommer, W. H. Schoenberg, S. O. Janssen, S. Overhoff, D. Froelich, M. F. Eur Radiol Computed Tomography OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), coronary CT angiography (CTA), and the combination of both in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients with previous coronary stent implantation. METHODS: A decision model based on Markov simulations estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with CTA, CTP, and CTA + CTP. Model input parameters were obtained from published literature. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate overall model uncertainty. A single-variable deterministic sensitivity analysis evaluated the sensitivity of the results to plausible variations in model inputs. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario with willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY, CTA resulted in total costs of $47,013.87 and an expected effectiveness of 6.84 QALYs, whereas CTP resulted in total costs of $46,758.83 with 6.93 QALYs. CTA + CTP reached costs of $47,455.63 with 6.85 QALYs. Therefore, strategies CTA and CTA + CTP were dominated by CTP in the base-case scenario. Deterministic sensitivity analysis demonstrated robustness of the model to variations of diagnostic efficacy parameters and costs in a broad range. CTP was cost-effective in the majority of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis as compared with CTA. CONCLUSIONS: CTP is cost-effective for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting and therefore should be considered a feasible approach in daily clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • CTP provides added diagnostic value in patients with previous coronary stents. • CTP is a cost-effective method for the detection of obstructive CAD or ISR in patients with previous stenting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880924/ /pubmed/32885295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Computed Tomography
Kim, S. H.
Rübenthaler, J.
Nörenberg, D.
Huber, T.
Kunz, W. G.
Sommer, W. H.
Schoenberg, S. O.
Janssen, S.
Overhoff, D.
Froelich, M. F.
Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
title Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
title_full Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
title_short Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
title_sort cost-effectiveness of stress ctp versus cta in detecting obstructive cad or in-stent restenosis in stented patients
topic Computed Tomography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07202-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsh costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT rubenthalerj costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT norenbergd costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT hubert costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT kunzwg costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT sommerwh costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT schoenbergso costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT janssens costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT overhoffd costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients
AT froelichmf costeffectivenessofstressctpversusctaindetectingobstructivecadorinstentrestenosisinstentedpatients