Cargando…

Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort

OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giganti, Francesco, Stabile, Armando, Stavrinides, Vasilis, Osinibi, Elizabeth, Retter, Adam, Orczyk, Clément, Panebianco, Valeria, Trock, Bruce J., Freeman, Alex, Haider, Aiman, Punwani, Shonit, Allen, Clare, Kirkham, Alex, Emberton, Mark, Moore, Caroline M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z
_version_ 1783650769993465856
author Giganti, Francesco
Stabile, Armando
Stavrinides, Vasilis
Osinibi, Elizabeth
Retter, Adam
Orczyk, Clément
Panebianco, Valeria
Trock, Bruce J.
Freeman, Alex
Haider, Aiman
Punwani, Shonit
Allen, Clare
Kirkham, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
author_facet Giganti, Francesco
Stabile, Armando
Stavrinides, Vasilis
Osinibi, Elizabeth
Retter, Adam
Orczyk, Clément
Panebianco, Valeria
Trock, Bruce J.
Freeman, Alex
Haider, Aiman
Punwani, Shonit
Allen, Clare
Kirkham, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
author_sort Giganti, Francesco
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change over time. We aimed to compare the PRECISE score with clinical progression in patients who are managed using an MRI-led AS protocol. METHODS: A total of 553 patients on AS for low- and intermediate-risk PCa (up to Gleason score 3 + 4) who had two or more MRI scans performed between December 2005 and January 2020 were included. Overall, 2161 scans were retrospectively re-reported by a dedicated radiologist to give a PI-RADS v2 score for each scan and assess the PRECISE score for each follow-up scan. Clinical progression was defined by histological progression to ≥ Gleason score 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or initiation of active treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test was used to assess differences between curves. RESULTS: Overall, 165/553 (30%) patients experienced the primary outcome of clinical progression (median follow-up, 74.5 months; interquartile ranges, 53–98). Of all patients, 313/553 (57%) did not show radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3), of which 296/313 (95%) had also no clinical progression. Of the remaining 240/553 patients (43%) with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5), 146/240 (61%) experienced clinical progression (p < 0.0001). Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. • Clinical progression was almost always detectable in patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS. • Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78809252021-02-18 Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort Giganti, Francesco Stabile, Armando Stavrinides, Vasilis Osinibi, Elizabeth Retter, Adam Orczyk, Clément Panebianco, Valeria Trock, Bruce J. Freeman, Alex Haider, Aiman Punwani, Shonit Allen, Clare Kirkham, Alex Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change over time. We aimed to compare the PRECISE score with clinical progression in patients who are managed using an MRI-led AS protocol. METHODS: A total of 553 patients on AS for low- and intermediate-risk PCa (up to Gleason score 3 + 4) who had two or more MRI scans performed between December 2005 and January 2020 were included. Overall, 2161 scans were retrospectively re-reported by a dedicated radiologist to give a PI-RADS v2 score for each scan and assess the PRECISE score for each follow-up scan. Clinical progression was defined by histological progression to ≥ Gleason score 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or initiation of active treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test was used to assess differences between curves. RESULTS: Overall, 165/553 (30%) patients experienced the primary outcome of clinical progression (median follow-up, 74.5 months; interquartile ranges, 53–98). Of all patients, 313/553 (57%) did not show radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3), of which 296/313 (95%) had also no clinical progression. Of the remaining 240/553 patients (43%) with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5), 146/240 (61%) experienced clinical progression (p < 0.0001). Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. • Clinical progression was almost always detectable in patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS. • Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880925/ /pubmed/33000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Urogenital
Giganti, Francesco
Stabile, Armando
Stavrinides, Vasilis
Osinibi, Elizabeth
Retter, Adam
Orczyk, Clément
Panebianco, Valeria
Trock, Bruce J.
Freeman, Alex
Haider, Aiman
Punwani, Shonit
Allen, Clare
Kirkham, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
title Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
title_full Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
title_fullStr Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
title_full_unstemmed Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
title_short Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
title_sort natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by mri using the precise recommendations in a uk cohort
topic Urogenital
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gigantifrancesco naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT stabilearmando naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT stavrinidesvasilis naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT osinibielizabeth naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT retteradam naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT orczykclement naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT panebiancovaleria naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT trockbrucej naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT freemanalex naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT haideraiman naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT punwanishonit naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT allenclare naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT kirkhamalex naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT embertonmark naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort
AT moorecarolinem naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort