Cargando…
Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z |
_version_ | 1783650769993465856 |
---|---|
author | Giganti, Francesco Stabile, Armando Stavrinides, Vasilis Osinibi, Elizabeth Retter, Adam Orczyk, Clément Panebianco, Valeria Trock, Bruce J. Freeman, Alex Haider, Aiman Punwani, Shonit Allen, Clare Kirkham, Alex Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. |
author_facet | Giganti, Francesco Stabile, Armando Stavrinides, Vasilis Osinibi, Elizabeth Retter, Adam Orczyk, Clément Panebianco, Valeria Trock, Bruce J. Freeman, Alex Haider, Aiman Punwani, Shonit Allen, Clare Kirkham, Alex Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. |
author_sort | Giganti, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change over time. We aimed to compare the PRECISE score with clinical progression in patients who are managed using an MRI-led AS protocol. METHODS: A total of 553 patients on AS for low- and intermediate-risk PCa (up to Gleason score 3 + 4) who had two or more MRI scans performed between December 2005 and January 2020 were included. Overall, 2161 scans were retrospectively re-reported by a dedicated radiologist to give a PI-RADS v2 score for each scan and assess the PRECISE score for each follow-up scan. Clinical progression was defined by histological progression to ≥ Gleason score 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or initiation of active treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test was used to assess differences between curves. RESULTS: Overall, 165/553 (30%) patients experienced the primary outcome of clinical progression (median follow-up, 74.5 months; interquartile ranges, 53–98). Of all patients, 313/553 (57%) did not show radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3), of which 296/313 (95%) had also no clinical progression. Of the remaining 240/553 patients (43%) with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5), 146/240 (61%) experienced clinical progression (p < 0.0001). Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. • Clinical progression was almost always detectable in patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS. • Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78809252021-02-18 Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort Giganti, Francesco Stabile, Armando Stavrinides, Vasilis Osinibi, Elizabeth Retter, Adam Orczyk, Clément Panebianco, Valeria Trock, Bruce J. Freeman, Alex Haider, Aiman Punwani, Shonit Allen, Clare Kirkham, Alex Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Eur Radiol Urogenital OBJECTIVES: The PRECISE recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) include repeated measurement of each lesion, and attribution of a PRECISE radiological progression score for the likelihood of clinically significant change over time. We aimed to compare the PRECISE score with clinical progression in patients who are managed using an MRI-led AS protocol. METHODS: A total of 553 patients on AS for low- and intermediate-risk PCa (up to Gleason score 3 + 4) who had two or more MRI scans performed between December 2005 and January 2020 were included. Overall, 2161 scans were retrospectively re-reported by a dedicated radiologist to give a PI-RADS v2 score for each scan and assess the PRECISE score for each follow-up scan. Clinical progression was defined by histological progression to ≥ Gleason score 4 + 3 (Gleason Grade Group 3) and/or initiation of active treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test was used to assess differences between curves. RESULTS: Overall, 165/553 (30%) patients experienced the primary outcome of clinical progression (median follow-up, 74.5 months; interquartile ranges, 53–98). Of all patients, 313/553 (57%) did not show radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3), of which 296/313 (95%) had also no clinical progression. Of the remaining 240/553 patients (43%) with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5), 146/240 (61%) experienced clinical progression (p < 0.0001). Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4-5) showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1-3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Patients without radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 1–3) during AS had a very low likelihood of clinical progression and many could avoid routine re-biopsy. • Clinical progression was almost always detectable in patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS. • Patients with radiological progression on MRI (PRECISE 4–5) during AS showed a trend to an increase in PSA density. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880925/ /pubmed/33000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Urogenital Giganti, Francesco Stabile, Armando Stavrinides, Vasilis Osinibi, Elizabeth Retter, Adam Orczyk, Clément Panebianco, Valeria Trock, Bruce J. Freeman, Alex Haider, Aiman Punwani, Shonit Allen, Clare Kirkham, Alex Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort |
title | Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort |
title_full | Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort |
title_fullStr | Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort |
title_short | Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort |
title_sort | natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by mri using the precise recommendations in a uk cohort |
topic | Urogenital |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07256-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gigantifrancesco naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT stabilearmando naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT stavrinidesvasilis naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT osinibielizabeth naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT retteradam naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT orczykclement naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT panebiancovaleria naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT trockbrucej naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT freemanalex naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT haideraiman naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT punwanishonit naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT allenclare naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT kirkhamalex naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT embertonmark naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort AT moorecarolinem naturalhistoryofprostatecanceronactivesurveillancestratificationbymriusingthepreciserecommendationsinaukcohort |