Cargando…

Impact of pre-stroke dependency on outcome after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current demographic changes indicate that more people will be care-dependent due to increasing life expectancy. Little is known about impact of preexisting dependency on stroke outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: We compared prospectively collected baseline a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oesch, Lisa, Arnold, Marcel, Bernasconi, Corrado, Kaesmacher, Johannes, Fischer, Urs, Mosimann, Pascal J., Jung, Simon, Meinel, Thomas, Goeldlin, Martina, Heldner, Mirjam, Volbers, Bastian, Gralla, Jan, Sarikaya, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32865630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10172-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current demographic changes indicate that more people will be care-dependent due to increasing life expectancy. Little is known about impact of preexisting dependency on stroke outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: We compared prospectively collected baseline and outcome data of previously dependent vs. independent stroke patients (prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 3–5 vs. 0–2) treated with EVT. Outcome measures were favorable 3-month outcome (mRS ≤ 3 for previously dependent and mRS ≤ 2 for independent patients, respectively), death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: Among 1247 patients, 84 (6.7%) were dependent before stroke. They were older (81 vs. 72 years of age), more often female (61.9% vs. 46%), had a higher stroke severity at baseline (NIHSS 18 vs. 15 points), more often history of previous stroke (32.9% vs. 9.1%) and more vascular risk factors than independent patients. Favorable outcome and mortality were to the disadvantage of independent patients (26.2% vs. 44.4% and 46.4% vs. 25.5%, respectively), whereas sICH was comparable in both cohorts (4.9% vs. 5%). However, preexisting dependency was not associated with clinical outcome and mortality after adjusting for outcome predictors (OR 1.076, 95% CI 0.612–1.891; p = 0.799 and OR 1.267, 95% CI 0.758–2.119; p = 0.367, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the need for careful selection of care-dependent stroke patients when considering EVT, given a less favorable outcome observed in this cohort. Nonetheless, EVT should not systematically be withheld in patients with preexisting disability, since prior dependency does not significantly influence outcome.