Cargando…
Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons
OBJECTIVES: To assess the interobserver reliability (IOR) of the Tile classification system, and its potential influence on outcomes, for the interpretation of CT images of pelvic fractures by radiologists and surgeons. METHODS: Retrospective data (1/2008–12/2016) from 238 patients with pelvic fract...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07247-0 |
_version_ | 1783650773305917440 |
---|---|
author | Zingg, Tobias Uldry, Emilie Omoumi, Patrick Clerc, Daniel Monier, Arnaud Pache, Basile Moshebah, Mohammed Butti, Fabio Becce, Fabio |
author_facet | Zingg, Tobias Uldry, Emilie Omoumi, Patrick Clerc, Daniel Monier, Arnaud Pache, Basile Moshebah, Mohammed Butti, Fabio Becce, Fabio |
author_sort | Zingg, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the interobserver reliability (IOR) of the Tile classification system, and its potential influence on outcomes, for the interpretation of CT images of pelvic fractures by radiologists and surgeons. METHODS: Retrospective data (1/2008–12/2016) from 238 patients with pelvic fractures were analyzed. Mean patient age was 44 years (SD 20); 66% were male. There were 54 Tile A, 82 Tile B, and 102 Tile C type injuries. The 30-day mortality rate was 15% (36/238). Six observers, three radiologists, and three surgeons with different levels of experience (attending/resident/intern) classified each fracture into one of the 26 second-order subcategories of the Tile classification. Weighted kappa coefficients were used to assess the IORs for the three main categories and nine first-order subcategories. RESULTS: The overall IORs of the Tile system for the main categories and first-order subcategories were moderate (kappa = 0.44) and fair (kappa = 0.31), respectively. IOR was fair to moderate among radiologists, but only fair among surgeons. By level of training, IOR was moderate between attendings and between residents, whereas it was only fair between interns. IOR was moderate to substantial (kappa = 0.56–0.70) between the radiology attending and resident. Association of the Tile fracture type with 30-day mortality was present based on two out of six observer ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The overall IOR of the Tile classification system is only fair to moderate, increases with the level of rater experience and is better among radiologists than surgeons. In the light of these findings, results from studies using this classification system must be interpreted cautiously. KEY POINTS: • The overall interobserver reliability of the Tile pelvic fracture classification is only fair to moderate. • Interobserver reliability increases with observer experience and radiologists have higher kappa coefficients than surgeons. • Interobserver reliability has an impact on the association of the Tile classification system with mortality in two out of six cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07247-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78809422021-02-18 Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons Zingg, Tobias Uldry, Emilie Omoumi, Patrick Clerc, Daniel Monier, Arnaud Pache, Basile Moshebah, Mohammed Butti, Fabio Becce, Fabio Eur Radiol Emergency Radiology OBJECTIVES: To assess the interobserver reliability (IOR) of the Tile classification system, and its potential influence on outcomes, for the interpretation of CT images of pelvic fractures by radiologists and surgeons. METHODS: Retrospective data (1/2008–12/2016) from 238 patients with pelvic fractures were analyzed. Mean patient age was 44 years (SD 20); 66% were male. There were 54 Tile A, 82 Tile B, and 102 Tile C type injuries. The 30-day mortality rate was 15% (36/238). Six observers, three radiologists, and three surgeons with different levels of experience (attending/resident/intern) classified each fracture into one of the 26 second-order subcategories of the Tile classification. Weighted kappa coefficients were used to assess the IORs for the three main categories and nine first-order subcategories. RESULTS: The overall IORs of the Tile system for the main categories and first-order subcategories were moderate (kappa = 0.44) and fair (kappa = 0.31), respectively. IOR was fair to moderate among radiologists, but only fair among surgeons. By level of training, IOR was moderate between attendings and between residents, whereas it was only fair between interns. IOR was moderate to substantial (kappa = 0.56–0.70) between the radiology attending and resident. Association of the Tile fracture type with 30-day mortality was present based on two out of six observer ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The overall IOR of the Tile classification system is only fair to moderate, increases with the level of rater experience and is better among radiologists than surgeons. In the light of these findings, results from studies using this classification system must be interpreted cautiously. KEY POINTS: • The overall interobserver reliability of the Tile pelvic fracture classification is only fair to moderate. • Interobserver reliability increases with observer experience and radiologists have higher kappa coefficients than surgeons. • Interobserver reliability has an impact on the association of the Tile classification system with mortality in two out of six cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07247-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880942/ /pubmed/32901303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07247-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Radiology Zingg, Tobias Uldry, Emilie Omoumi, Patrick Clerc, Daniel Monier, Arnaud Pache, Basile Moshebah, Mohammed Butti, Fabio Becce, Fabio Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
title | Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
title_full | Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
title_fullStr | Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
title_full_unstemmed | Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
title_short | Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
title_sort | interobserver reliability of the tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons |
topic | Emergency Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07247-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zinggtobias interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT uldryemilie interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT omoumipatrick interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT clercdaniel interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT monierarnaud interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT pachebasile interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT moshebahmohammed interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT buttifabio interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons AT beccefabio interobserverreliabilityofthetileclassificationsystemforpelvicfracturesamongradiologistsandsurgeons |