Cargando…
Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version
BACKGROUND: In 2011, the IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) working group of the Japanese Society of Nephrology proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD. The aim of the present study was to validate those criteria and develop a revised version. METHODS: Between April 2012 and May 2019, we retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10157-020-01993-7 |
_version_ | 1783650774238101504 |
---|---|
author | Saeki, Takako Kawano, Mitsuhiro Nagasawa, Tasuku Ubara, Yoshifumi Taniguchi, Yoshinori Yanagita, Motoko Nishi, Shinichi Nagata, Michio Hisano, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Yutaka Nomura, Hideki Saito, Takao Nakashima, Hitoshi |
author_facet | Saeki, Takako Kawano, Mitsuhiro Nagasawa, Tasuku Ubara, Yoshifumi Taniguchi, Yoshinori Yanagita, Motoko Nishi, Shinichi Nagata, Michio Hisano, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Yutaka Nomura, Hideki Saito, Takao Nakashima, Hitoshi |
author_sort | Saeki, Takako |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2011, the IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) working group of the Japanese Society of Nephrology proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD. The aim of the present study was to validate those criteria and develop a revised version. METHODS: Between April 2012 and May 2019, we retrospectively collected Japanese patients with kidney disease, for whom data on serum IgG4 values and/or immunohistological staining for IgG4 in renal biopsy samples were available. These patients were classified as IgG4-RKD or non-IgG4-RKD based on the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011, and the results were evaluated by expert opinion. Accordingly, we developed some revised versions of the criteria, and the version showing the best performance in the present cohort was proposed as the IgG4-RKD criteria for 2020. RESULTS: Of 105 included patients, the expert panel diagnosed 55 as having true IgG4-RKD and 50 as mimickers. The diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011 had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 90.0% in this cohort. Of the 15 patients with true IgG4-RKD who were classified as non-IgG4-RKD, all lacked biopsy-proven extra-renal lesions, although many had clinical findings highly suggestive of IgG4-RD. The revised version to which “bilateral lacrimal, submandibular or parotid swelling, imaging findings compatible with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis or retroperitoneal fibrosis” was added as an item pertaining to extra-renal organ(s) improved the sensitivity to 90.9% while the specificity remained at 90.0%. CONCLUSION: The revised version has considerably improved test performance after addition of the new extra-renal organ item (imaging and clinical findings). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7880946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78809462021-02-18 Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version Saeki, Takako Kawano, Mitsuhiro Nagasawa, Tasuku Ubara, Yoshifumi Taniguchi, Yoshinori Yanagita, Motoko Nishi, Shinichi Nagata, Michio Hisano, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Yutaka Nomura, Hideki Saito, Takao Nakashima, Hitoshi Clin Exp Nephrol Special Report BACKGROUND: In 2011, the IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) working group of the Japanese Society of Nephrology proposed diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD. The aim of the present study was to validate those criteria and develop a revised version. METHODS: Between April 2012 and May 2019, we retrospectively collected Japanese patients with kidney disease, for whom data on serum IgG4 values and/or immunohistological staining for IgG4 in renal biopsy samples were available. These patients were classified as IgG4-RKD or non-IgG4-RKD based on the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011, and the results were evaluated by expert opinion. Accordingly, we developed some revised versions of the criteria, and the version showing the best performance in the present cohort was proposed as the IgG4-RKD criteria for 2020. RESULTS: Of 105 included patients, the expert panel diagnosed 55 as having true IgG4-RKD and 50 as mimickers. The diagnostic criteria for IgG4-RKD 2011 had a sensitivity of 72.7% and a specificity of 90.0% in this cohort. Of the 15 patients with true IgG4-RKD who were classified as non-IgG4-RKD, all lacked biopsy-proven extra-renal lesions, although many had clinical findings highly suggestive of IgG4-RD. The revised version to which “bilateral lacrimal, submandibular or parotid swelling, imaging findings compatible with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis or retroperitoneal fibrosis” was added as an item pertaining to extra-renal organ(s) improved the sensitivity to 90.9% while the specificity remained at 90.0%. CONCLUSION: The revised version has considerably improved test performance after addition of the new extra-renal organ item (imaging and clinical findings). Springer Singapore 2021-01-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880946/ /pubmed/33398598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10157-020-01993-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Special Report Saeki, Takako Kawano, Mitsuhiro Nagasawa, Tasuku Ubara, Yoshifumi Taniguchi, Yoshinori Yanagita, Motoko Nishi, Shinichi Nagata, Michio Hisano, Satoshi Yamaguchi, Yutaka Nomura, Hideki Saito, Takao Nakashima, Hitoshi Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
title | Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
title_full | Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
title_fullStr | Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
title_short | Validation of the diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
title_sort | validation of the diagnostic criteria for igg4-related kidney disease (igg4-rkd) 2011, and proposal of a new 2020 version |
topic | Special Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10157-020-01993-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saekitakako validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT kawanomitsuhiro validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT nagasawatasuku validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT ubarayoshifumi validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT taniguchiyoshinori validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT yanagitamotoko validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT nishishinichi validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT nagatamichio validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT hisanosatoshi validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT yamaguchiyutaka validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT nomurahideki validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT saitotakao validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version AT nakashimahitoshi validationofthediagnosticcriteriaforigg4relatedkidneydiseaseigg4rkd2011andproposalofanew2020version |