Cargando…

Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: T2*-weighted (T2*w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2* images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavon, Anna Giulia, Georgiopoulos, Georgios, Vincenti, Gabriella, Muller, Olivier, Monney, Pierre, Berchier, Gregoire, Cirillo, Chiara, Eeckhout, Eric, Schwitter, Juerg, Masci, Pier Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1
_version_ 1783650777648070656
author Pavon, Anna Giulia
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Vincenti, Gabriella
Muller, Olivier
Monney, Pierre
Berchier, Gregoire
Cirillo, Chiara
Eeckhout, Eric
Schwitter, Juerg
Masci, Pier Giorgio
author_facet Pavon, Anna Giulia
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Vincenti, Gabriella
Muller, Olivier
Monney, Pierre
Berchier, Gregoire
Cirillo, Chiara
Eeckhout, Eric
Schwitter, Juerg
Masci, Pier Giorgio
author_sort Pavon, Anna Giulia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: T2*-weighted (T2*w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2* images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH diagnosis and quantification have been seldomly investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2016 and May 2017, 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (66% male, 57 ± 17 years) and 15 healthy controls (60% male, 58 ± 13) were consecutively enrolled. Subjects underwent head-to-head comparison of single mid-infarct slice acquired on black-blood T2-weighted short-TI-inversion recovery (T2w-STIR), bright-blood T2prep-steady-state-free precession (T2prep-SSFP), and T2/T1 maps for IMH diagnosis and quantification against T2*w. All images were graded for quality (grade 1: very poor; grade 4: excellent) and diagnostic confidence (Likert scale, 1: very unsure and 5: highly confident). Reduced relaxation time/hypointense region (hypocore) embedded in infarct-related oedema on T2 map, T1 map, and T2w-STIR had the best overall diagnostic accuracy (per-subject: 91%, 86%, and 86%, respectively; per segment: 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively). By mixed-effects analysis, image quality, and diagnostic confidence were higher for T2 map and T1 maps than T2*w (p < 0.05 for both scores). For IMH quantification, hypocore on T2 map and T1 map strongly correlated (Spearman’s r > 0.7, p < 0.001 for both) with IMH extent on T2*w and presented an overall excellent agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. By linear mixed model analysis, absolute hypocore size did not differ among T1-, T2 map, and T2*w. T2/T1 maps had the best intra- and inter-observer reproducibility among CMR techniques. CONCLUSION: Hypocore on T2/T1 map is the best alternative technique to T2*w for diagnosing and quantifying IMH in post-STEMI patients. KEY POINT: • Mapping techniques are the best alternatives for diagnosing post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage. • Mapping techniques are valuable tools for imaging intramyocardial haemorrhage. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7880961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78809612021-02-18 Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction Pavon, Anna Giulia Georgiopoulos, Georgios Vincenti, Gabriella Muller, Olivier Monney, Pierre Berchier, Gregoire Cirillo, Chiara Eeckhout, Eric Schwitter, Juerg Masci, Pier Giorgio Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: T2*-weighted (T2*w) is deemed as a reference standard for post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage (IMH). However, high proportion of T2* images is affected by off-resonance artefacts hampering image interpretation. Diagnostic accuracy and precision of alternative techniques for IMH diagnosis and quantification have been seldomly investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2016 and May 2017, 50 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients (66% male, 57 ± 17 years) and 15 healthy controls (60% male, 58 ± 13) were consecutively enrolled. Subjects underwent head-to-head comparison of single mid-infarct slice acquired on black-blood T2-weighted short-TI-inversion recovery (T2w-STIR), bright-blood T2prep-steady-state-free precession (T2prep-SSFP), and T2/T1 maps for IMH diagnosis and quantification against T2*w. All images were graded for quality (grade 1: very poor; grade 4: excellent) and diagnostic confidence (Likert scale, 1: very unsure and 5: highly confident). Reduced relaxation time/hypointense region (hypocore) embedded in infarct-related oedema on T2 map, T1 map, and T2w-STIR had the best overall diagnostic accuracy (per-subject: 91%, 86%, and 86%, respectively; per segment: 95%, 93%, and 93%, respectively). By mixed-effects analysis, image quality, and diagnostic confidence were higher for T2 map and T1 maps than T2*w (p < 0.05 for both scores). For IMH quantification, hypocore on T2 map and T1 map strongly correlated (Spearman’s r > 0.7, p < 0.001 for both) with IMH extent on T2*w and presented an overall excellent agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. By linear mixed model analysis, absolute hypocore size did not differ among T1-, T2 map, and T2*w. T2/T1 maps had the best intra- and inter-observer reproducibility among CMR techniques. CONCLUSION: Hypocore on T2/T1 map is the best alternative technique to T2*w for diagnosing and quantifying IMH in post-STEMI patients. KEY POINT: • Mapping techniques are the best alternatives for diagnosing post-infarction intramyocardial haemorrhage. • Mapping techniques are valuable tools for imaging intramyocardial haemorrhage. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7880961/ /pubmed/32929640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiac
Pavon, Anna Giulia
Georgiopoulos, Georgios
Vincenti, Gabriella
Muller, Olivier
Monney, Pierre
Berchier, Gregoire
Cirillo, Chiara
Eeckhout, Eric
Schwitter, Juerg
Masci, Pier Giorgio
Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_full Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_short Head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort head-to-head comparison of multiple cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the detection and quantification of intramyocardial haemorrhage in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7880961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07254-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pavonannagiulia headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT georgiopoulosgeorgios headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT vincentigabriella headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mullerolivier headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT monneypierre headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT berchiergregoire headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT cirillochiara headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT eeckhouteric headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT schwitterjuerg headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mascipiergiorgio headtoheadcomparisonofmultiplecardiovascularmagneticresonancetechniquesforthedetectionandquantificationofintramyocardialhaemorrhageinpatientswithstelevationmyocardialinfarction