Cargando…
It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action
Agility is an important skill for both attackers and defenders in invasion sports such as codes of football. On the sporting field, agility requires reacting to a stimulus, often presented by an opponent’s movement, before a change of direction or speed. There is a plethora of research that examines...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33580424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00304-y |
_version_ | 1783650799092498432 |
---|---|
author | Young, Warren Rayner, Russell Talpey, Scott |
author_facet | Young, Warren Rayner, Russell Talpey, Scott |
author_sort | Young, Warren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agility is an important skill for both attackers and defenders in invasion sports such as codes of football. On the sporting field, agility requires reacting to a stimulus, often presented by an opponent’s movement, before a change of direction or speed. There is a plethora of research that examines the movement component of agility in isolation, which is described as change-of-direction (COD) ability, and this is thought to underpin agility performance. This opinion article proposes that COD ability should not be researched as the only or primary outcome measure when the objective is to inform agility performance in invasion sports. It is argued that pre-planned COD movements and tests lack ecological validity because they lack perception-action coupling and involve movement out of context from the game. The movement techniques and strength qualities required for the performance of COD tests can be quite different to those required for agility. It is suggested that COD tests can be applied to sports that involve pre-planned COD movements, but researchers should endeavour to use agility tests when studying invasion sports. Some new methods for assessing one-on-one agility contests are reported as potentially valuable for future research, and examples of research questions are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7881072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78810722021-02-25 It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action Young, Warren Rayner, Russell Talpey, Scott Sports Med Open Current Opinion Agility is an important skill for both attackers and defenders in invasion sports such as codes of football. On the sporting field, agility requires reacting to a stimulus, often presented by an opponent’s movement, before a change of direction or speed. There is a plethora of research that examines the movement component of agility in isolation, which is described as change-of-direction (COD) ability, and this is thought to underpin agility performance. This opinion article proposes that COD ability should not be researched as the only or primary outcome measure when the objective is to inform agility performance in invasion sports. It is argued that pre-planned COD movements and tests lack ecological validity because they lack perception-action coupling and involve movement out of context from the game. The movement techniques and strength qualities required for the performance of COD tests can be quite different to those required for agility. It is suggested that COD tests can be applied to sports that involve pre-planned COD movements, but researchers should endeavour to use agility tests when studying invasion sports. Some new methods for assessing one-on-one agility contests are reported as potentially valuable for future research, and examples of research questions are provided. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7881072/ /pubmed/33580424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00304-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Current Opinion Young, Warren Rayner, Russell Talpey, Scott It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action |
title | It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action |
title_full | It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action |
title_fullStr | It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action |
title_full_unstemmed | It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action |
title_short | It’s Time to Change Direction on Agility Research: a Call to Action |
title_sort | it’s time to change direction on agility research: a call to action |
topic | Current Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33580424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00304-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngwarren itstimetochangedirectiononagilityresearchacalltoaction AT raynerrussell itstimetochangedirectiononagilityresearchacalltoaction AT talpeyscott itstimetochangedirectiononagilityresearchacalltoaction |