Cargando…

One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol

BACKGROUND: A two-stage prosthesis exchange procedure has been the gold standard in surgical treatment of the chronically infected knee arthroplasty so far. This includes 2 surgeries/hospitalizations and an interim period of 2–3 months between surgeries with impaired health, functional status and qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindberg-Larsen, Martin, Odgaard, Anders, Fredborg, Charlotte, Schrøder, Henrik Morville
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04044-8
_version_ 1783650905670811648
author Lindberg-Larsen, Martin
Odgaard, Anders
Fredborg, Charlotte
Schrøder, Henrik Morville
author_facet Lindberg-Larsen, Martin
Odgaard, Anders
Fredborg, Charlotte
Schrøder, Henrik Morville
author_sort Lindberg-Larsen, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A two-stage prosthesis exchange procedure has been the gold standard in surgical treatment of the chronically infected knee arthroplasty so far. This includes 2 surgeries/hospitalizations and an interim period of 2–3 months between surgeries with impaired health, functional status and quality of life of the patients. A one-stage exchange procedure holds many obvious advantages compared to the two-stage approach, but outcomes of a one-stage versus two-stage procedures have never been investigated in a randomized clinical trial. The purpose of this study is primarily to investigate time-adjusted differences in functional status of patients after one-stage versus two-stage revision. Secondary, to report time-adjusted differences in quality of life, complications (including re-revisions due to infection) and mortality. METHODS: This study is a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty. Seven Danish hospitals are currently participating in the study, but additional hospitals can enter the study if adhering to protocol. Ninety-six patients will be included prospectively. Follow-up will be with PROM-questionnaires and clinical controls up to 10 years. The patients who are not able to participate in the randomized trial are followed in a parallel cohort study. PROM’S: Oxford Knee Score and EQ5D + EQ5D VAS questionnaires are completed preoperatively and sent out to the study participants at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months as well as 5 and 10 years postoperatively. In addition a tailor made cost questionnaire on the non-treating hospital resource use, community health and social service use, travel costs, time off work and informal care are sent out. DISCUSSION: If one of the two treatment alternatives is found superior in both domains of quality of life (both knee-specific and generic) and health economics, that treatment should be promoted. Other outcomes will open informed discussions about treatment strategies for periprosthetic knee infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The randomized trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT03435679, initial release date January 31, 2018 and the cohort study is registered with ID NCT04427943, submitted January 8, 2020 and posted June 11, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7881574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78815742021-02-17 One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol Lindberg-Larsen, Martin Odgaard, Anders Fredborg, Charlotte Schrøder, Henrik Morville BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A two-stage prosthesis exchange procedure has been the gold standard in surgical treatment of the chronically infected knee arthroplasty so far. This includes 2 surgeries/hospitalizations and an interim period of 2–3 months between surgeries with impaired health, functional status and quality of life of the patients. A one-stage exchange procedure holds many obvious advantages compared to the two-stage approach, but outcomes of a one-stage versus two-stage procedures have never been investigated in a randomized clinical trial. The purpose of this study is primarily to investigate time-adjusted differences in functional status of patients after one-stage versus two-stage revision. Secondary, to report time-adjusted differences in quality of life, complications (including re-revisions due to infection) and mortality. METHODS: This study is a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty. Seven Danish hospitals are currently participating in the study, but additional hospitals can enter the study if adhering to protocol. Ninety-six patients will be included prospectively. Follow-up will be with PROM-questionnaires and clinical controls up to 10 years. The patients who are not able to participate in the randomized trial are followed in a parallel cohort study. PROM’S: Oxford Knee Score and EQ5D + EQ5D VAS questionnaires are completed preoperatively and sent out to the study participants at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months as well as 5 and 10 years postoperatively. In addition a tailor made cost questionnaire on the non-treating hospital resource use, community health and social service use, travel costs, time off work and informal care are sent out. DISCUSSION: If one of the two treatment alternatives is found superior in both domains of quality of life (both knee-specific and generic) and health economics, that treatment should be promoted. Other outcomes will open informed discussions about treatment strategies for periprosthetic knee infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The randomized trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT03435679, initial release date January 31, 2018 and the cohort study is registered with ID NCT04427943, submitted January 8, 2020 and posted June 11, 2020. BioMed Central 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7881574/ /pubmed/33579256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04044-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lindberg-Larsen, Martin
Odgaard, Anders
Fredborg, Charlotte
Schrøder, Henrik Morville
One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
title One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
title_full One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
title_fullStr One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
title_full_unstemmed One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
title_short One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
title_sort one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04044-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lindberglarsenmartin onestageversustwostagerevisionoftheinfectedkneearthroplastyarandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialstudyprotocol
AT odgaardanders onestageversustwostagerevisionoftheinfectedkneearthroplastyarandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialstudyprotocol
AT fredborgcharlotte onestageversustwostagerevisionoftheinfectedkneearthroplastyarandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialstudyprotocol
AT schrøderhenrikmorville onestageversustwostagerevisionoftheinfectedkneearthroplastyarandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialstudyprotocol
AT onestageversustwostagerevisionoftheinfectedkneearthroplastyarandomizedmulticenterclinicaltrialstudyprotocol