Cargando…

Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds

BACKGROUND: Average daily gain (ADG) in pigs is affected by both direct and social genetic effects (SGE). However, selection for SGE in purebreds has not conclusively been shown to improve ADG in crossbreds, and it is unknown whether SGE in purebreds are equal to those in crossbreds. Moreover, SGE m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ask, Birgitte, Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard, Christensen, Ole Fredslund, Nielsen, Hanne Marie, Turner, Simon P., Nielsen, Bjarne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00609-2
_version_ 1783650909692100608
author Ask, Birgitte
Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard
Christensen, Ole Fredslund
Nielsen, Hanne Marie
Turner, Simon P.
Nielsen, Bjarne
author_facet Ask, Birgitte
Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard
Christensen, Ole Fredslund
Nielsen, Hanne Marie
Turner, Simon P.
Nielsen, Bjarne
author_sort Ask, Birgitte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Average daily gain (ADG) in pigs is affected by both direct and social genetic effects (SGE). However, selection for SGE in purebreds has not conclusively been shown to improve ADG in crossbreds, and it is unknown whether SGE in purebreds are equal to those in crossbreds. Moreover, SGE may reflect dominance related behaviour, which is affected by the variation in body weight within a group. Therefore, we hypothesized that (a) there is a positive effect of parent average SGE estimated in purebred pigs on phenotypic ADG in crossbred offspring, and (b) there is an interaction between SGE on ADG and standard deviation in starting weight of pigs within the group. We also hypothesized that (c) social genetic variance for ADG exists in crossbred pigs, and (d) there is a favourable genetic correlation between SGE on ADG in purebred and crossbred pigs. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant interaction between the standard deviation in starting weight and SGE within groups, and conditioning on the mean standard deviation in starting weight, we found a favourable regression coefficient (0.37 ± 0.21) of ADG in crossbreds on SGE in purebreds. Variances for SGE were small in both Landrace (L) and Yorkshire (Y), and higher for SGE in both the dam and sire component of crossbred YL. The genetic correlations between SGE in purebreds and the dam or sire component of SGE in crossbreds were also favourable (0.52 ± 0.48 and 0.34 ± 0.42, respectively), although not significantly different from 0. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that there is a positive effect of SGE estimated using purebred information on phenotypic ADG in crossbreds, and that the largest effect is achieved when the within-group variation in starting weight is small. Our results indicate that social genetic variance in crossbreds exists and that there is a favourable genetic correlation between social genetic effects in purebreds and crossbreds. Collectively, our results indicate that selection for SGE on ADG in purebreds in a nucleus farm environment with little competition for resources can improve ADG in crossbreds in a commercial environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7881594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78815942021-02-17 Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds Ask, Birgitte Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard Christensen, Ole Fredslund Nielsen, Hanne Marie Turner, Simon P. Nielsen, Bjarne Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Average daily gain (ADG) in pigs is affected by both direct and social genetic effects (SGE). However, selection for SGE in purebreds has not conclusively been shown to improve ADG in crossbreds, and it is unknown whether SGE in purebreds are equal to those in crossbreds. Moreover, SGE may reflect dominance related behaviour, which is affected by the variation in body weight within a group. Therefore, we hypothesized that (a) there is a positive effect of parent average SGE estimated in purebred pigs on phenotypic ADG in crossbred offspring, and (b) there is an interaction between SGE on ADG and standard deviation in starting weight of pigs within the group. We also hypothesized that (c) social genetic variance for ADG exists in crossbred pigs, and (d) there is a favourable genetic correlation between SGE on ADG in purebred and crossbred pigs. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant interaction between the standard deviation in starting weight and SGE within groups, and conditioning on the mean standard deviation in starting weight, we found a favourable regression coefficient (0.37 ± 0.21) of ADG in crossbreds on SGE in purebreds. Variances for SGE were small in both Landrace (L) and Yorkshire (Y), and higher for SGE in both the dam and sire component of crossbred YL. The genetic correlations between SGE in purebreds and the dam or sire component of SGE in crossbreds were also favourable (0.52 ± 0.48 and 0.34 ± 0.42, respectively), although not significantly different from 0. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that there is a positive effect of SGE estimated using purebred information on phenotypic ADG in crossbreds, and that the largest effect is achieved when the within-group variation in starting weight is small. Our results indicate that social genetic variance in crossbreds exists and that there is a favourable genetic correlation between social genetic effects in purebreds and crossbreds. Collectively, our results indicate that selection for SGE on ADG in purebreds in a nucleus farm environment with little competition for resources can improve ADG in crossbreds in a commercial environment. BioMed Central 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7881594/ /pubmed/33579188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00609-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ask, Birgitte
Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard
Christensen, Ole Fredslund
Nielsen, Hanne Marie
Turner, Simon P.
Nielsen, Bjarne
Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
title Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
title_full Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
title_fullStr Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
title_full_unstemmed Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
title_short Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
title_sort selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00609-2
work_keys_str_mv AT askbirgitte selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds
AT pedersenlizettevestergaard selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds
AT christensenolefredslund selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds
AT nielsenhannemarie selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds
AT turnersimonp selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds
AT nielsenbjarne selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds