Cargando…
Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds
BACKGROUND: Average daily gain (ADG) in pigs is affected by both direct and social genetic effects (SGE). However, selection for SGE in purebreds has not conclusively been shown to improve ADG in crossbreds, and it is unknown whether SGE in purebreds are equal to those in crossbreds. Moreover, SGE m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00609-2 |
_version_ | 1783650909692100608 |
---|---|
author | Ask, Birgitte Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard Christensen, Ole Fredslund Nielsen, Hanne Marie Turner, Simon P. Nielsen, Bjarne |
author_facet | Ask, Birgitte Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard Christensen, Ole Fredslund Nielsen, Hanne Marie Turner, Simon P. Nielsen, Bjarne |
author_sort | Ask, Birgitte |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Average daily gain (ADG) in pigs is affected by both direct and social genetic effects (SGE). However, selection for SGE in purebreds has not conclusively been shown to improve ADG in crossbreds, and it is unknown whether SGE in purebreds are equal to those in crossbreds. Moreover, SGE may reflect dominance related behaviour, which is affected by the variation in body weight within a group. Therefore, we hypothesized that (a) there is a positive effect of parent average SGE estimated in purebred pigs on phenotypic ADG in crossbred offspring, and (b) there is an interaction between SGE on ADG and standard deviation in starting weight of pigs within the group. We also hypothesized that (c) social genetic variance for ADG exists in crossbred pigs, and (d) there is a favourable genetic correlation between SGE on ADG in purebred and crossbred pigs. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant interaction between the standard deviation in starting weight and SGE within groups, and conditioning on the mean standard deviation in starting weight, we found a favourable regression coefficient (0.37 ± 0.21) of ADG in crossbreds on SGE in purebreds. Variances for SGE were small in both Landrace (L) and Yorkshire (Y), and higher for SGE in both the dam and sire component of crossbred YL. The genetic correlations between SGE in purebreds and the dam or sire component of SGE in crossbreds were also favourable (0.52 ± 0.48 and 0.34 ± 0.42, respectively), although not significantly different from 0. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that there is a positive effect of SGE estimated using purebred information on phenotypic ADG in crossbreds, and that the largest effect is achieved when the within-group variation in starting weight is small. Our results indicate that social genetic variance in crossbreds exists and that there is a favourable genetic correlation between social genetic effects in purebreds and crossbreds. Collectively, our results indicate that selection for SGE on ADG in purebreds in a nucleus farm environment with little competition for resources can improve ADG in crossbreds in a commercial environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7881594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78815942021-02-17 Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds Ask, Birgitte Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard Christensen, Ole Fredslund Nielsen, Hanne Marie Turner, Simon P. Nielsen, Bjarne Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Average daily gain (ADG) in pigs is affected by both direct and social genetic effects (SGE). However, selection for SGE in purebreds has not conclusively been shown to improve ADG in crossbreds, and it is unknown whether SGE in purebreds are equal to those in crossbreds. Moreover, SGE may reflect dominance related behaviour, which is affected by the variation in body weight within a group. Therefore, we hypothesized that (a) there is a positive effect of parent average SGE estimated in purebred pigs on phenotypic ADG in crossbred offspring, and (b) there is an interaction between SGE on ADG and standard deviation in starting weight of pigs within the group. We also hypothesized that (c) social genetic variance for ADG exists in crossbred pigs, and (d) there is a favourable genetic correlation between SGE on ADG in purebred and crossbred pigs. RESULTS: We found a statistically significant interaction between the standard deviation in starting weight and SGE within groups, and conditioning on the mean standard deviation in starting weight, we found a favourable regression coefficient (0.37 ± 0.21) of ADG in crossbreds on SGE in purebreds. Variances for SGE were small in both Landrace (L) and Yorkshire (Y), and higher for SGE in both the dam and sire component of crossbred YL. The genetic correlations between SGE in purebreds and the dam or sire component of SGE in crossbreds were also favourable (0.52 ± 0.48 and 0.34 ± 0.42, respectively), although not significantly different from 0. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that there is a positive effect of SGE estimated using purebred information on phenotypic ADG in crossbreds, and that the largest effect is achieved when the within-group variation in starting weight is small. Our results indicate that social genetic variance in crossbreds exists and that there is a favourable genetic correlation between social genetic effects in purebreds and crossbreds. Collectively, our results indicate that selection for SGE on ADG in purebreds in a nucleus farm environment with little competition for resources can improve ADG in crossbreds in a commercial environment. BioMed Central 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7881594/ /pubmed/33579188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00609-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ask, Birgitte Pedersen, Lizette Vestergaard Christensen, Ole Fredslund Nielsen, Hanne Marie Turner, Simon P. Nielsen, Bjarne Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
title | Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
title_full | Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
title_fullStr | Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
title_short | Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
title_sort | selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00609-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT askbirgitte selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds AT pedersenlizettevestergaard selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds AT christensenolefredslund selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds AT nielsenhannemarie selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds AT turnersimonp selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds AT nielsenbjarne selectionforsocialgeneticeffectsinpurebredsincreasesgrowthincrossbreds |