Cargando…

Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review

AIM: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have progressively become a popular tool for making optimal clinical decisions. The literature shows that the poor quality of CPGs can form a barrier against adhering to them, resulting in a suboptimal level of healthcare. The objective of this systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almazrou, Saja H, Alsubki, Layan A, Alsaigh, Norah A, Aldhubaib, Wadha H, Ghazwani, Sharifah M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S284689
_version_ 1783650950651576320
author Almazrou, Saja H
Alsubki, Layan A
Alsaigh, Norah A
Aldhubaib, Wadha H
Ghazwani, Sharifah M
author_facet Almazrou, Saja H
Alsubki, Layan A
Alsaigh, Norah A
Aldhubaib, Wadha H
Ghazwani, Sharifah M
author_sort Almazrou, Saja H
collection PubMed
description AIM: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have progressively become a popular tool for making optimal clinical decisions. The literature shows that the poor quality of CPGs can form a barrier against adhering to them, resulting in a suboptimal level of healthcare. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of CPGs in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument. METHODS: The authors searched in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through the Ovid interface on May 25, 2019. Keywords relating to CPGs and MENA countries were combined using Boolean search operators. The search was not limited to specific diseases. The quality of guidelines was appraised by two reviewers independently using the AGREE II Instrument. Discrepancies within a group were resolved through the involvement of a principle investigator. RESULTS: A total of 61 CPGs were appraised. These guidelines were mainly from Saudi Arabia, and the most covered disease topic was cancer. Among the six domains of the AGREE II Instrument, CPGs scored the highest on clarity of presentation (mean 82%), while the lowest score was granted to the rigor of development domain (mean 28%). This indicates substantial deficiencies in reporting the developmental processes of CPGs and the resources used for the synthesis of evidence. CONCLUSION: From this review, it was found that the number of retrieved guidelines published in the MENA region is limited considering the large geographical area of the MENA region. The main domains that have higher quality scores were clarity of presentation and scope and purpose, whereas domains with the lowest scores were rigor of development and applicability. The authors’ findings will help policymakers identify areas for improvement in CPGs, which can lead them to implement strategies such as the training of individuals and recruitment of international experts to ultimately develop high-quality CPGs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7881789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78817892021-02-17 Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review Almazrou, Saja H Alsubki, Layan A Alsaigh, Norah A Aldhubaib, Wadha H Ghazwani, Sharifah M J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research AIM: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have progressively become a popular tool for making optimal clinical decisions. The literature shows that the poor quality of CPGs can form a barrier against adhering to them, resulting in a suboptimal level of healthcare. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of CPGs in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument. METHODS: The authors searched in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through the Ovid interface on May 25, 2019. Keywords relating to CPGs and MENA countries were combined using Boolean search operators. The search was not limited to specific diseases. The quality of guidelines was appraised by two reviewers independently using the AGREE II Instrument. Discrepancies within a group were resolved through the involvement of a principle investigator. RESULTS: A total of 61 CPGs were appraised. These guidelines were mainly from Saudi Arabia, and the most covered disease topic was cancer. Among the six domains of the AGREE II Instrument, CPGs scored the highest on clarity of presentation (mean 82%), while the lowest score was granted to the rigor of development domain (mean 28%). This indicates substantial deficiencies in reporting the developmental processes of CPGs and the resources used for the synthesis of evidence. CONCLUSION: From this review, it was found that the number of retrieved guidelines published in the MENA region is limited considering the large geographical area of the MENA region. The main domains that have higher quality scores were clarity of presentation and scope and purpose, whereas domains with the lowest scores were rigor of development and applicability. The authors’ findings will help policymakers identify areas for improvement in CPGs, which can lead them to implement strategies such as the training of individuals and recruitment of international experts to ultimately develop high-quality CPGs. Dove 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7881789/ /pubmed/33603389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S284689 Text en © 2021 Almazrou et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Almazrou, Saja H
Alsubki, Layan A
Alsaigh, Norah A
Aldhubaib, Wadha H
Ghazwani, Sharifah M
Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
title Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines in the middle east and north africa (mena) region: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7881789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S284689
work_keys_str_mv AT almazrousajah assessingthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinthemiddleeastandnorthafricamenaregionasystematicreview
AT alsubkilayana assessingthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinthemiddleeastandnorthafricamenaregionasystematicreview
AT alsaighnoraha assessingthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinthemiddleeastandnorthafricamenaregionasystematicreview
AT aldhubaibwadhah assessingthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinthemiddleeastandnorthafricamenaregionasystematicreview
AT ghazwanisharifahm assessingthequalityofclinicalpracticeguidelinesinthemiddleeastandnorthafricamenaregionasystematicreview