Cargando…

How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study

PURPOSE: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is often used for patient setup based solely on bony anatomy. The goal of this work was to evaluate whether CBCT dose can be lowered to the level of kV image pair doses when used for bony anatomy‐based IGRT without compromising positioning accuracy. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olch, Arthur J., Alaei, Parham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33450139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13164
_version_ 1783650992791748608
author Olch, Arthur J.
Alaei, Parham
author_facet Olch, Arthur J.
Alaei, Parham
author_sort Olch, Arthur J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is often used for patient setup based solely on bony anatomy. The goal of this work was to evaluate whether CBCT dose can be lowered to the level of kV image pair doses when used for bony anatomy‐based IGRT without compromising positioning accuracy. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was CT scanned in the head, head and neck, chest, and pelvis regions and setup on the linear accelerator couch with the isocenter near the planned location. Cone beam computed tomographies were performed with the standard “full dose” protocol supplied by the linac vendor. With sequentially lowering the dose, three‐dimensional (3D) matching was performed for each without shifting the couch. The standard kV image pair protocol for each site was also used to image the phantoms. For all studies, six degrees of freedom was included in the 2D or 3D matching to the extent they could be employed. Imaging doses were determined in air at isocenter following the TG‐61 formalism. RESULTS: Cone beam computed tomography dose was reduced by 81–98% of the standard CBCT protocol to nearly that of the standard kV image pair dose for each site. Relative to the standard CBCT shift values, translational shifts were within 0.3 and 1.6 mm for all sites, for the reduced dose CBCT and kV image pair, respectively. Rotational shifts were within 0.2 degree and 0.7 degrees for all sites, for the reduced dose CBCTs and kV image pair, respectively. CONCLUSION: For bony anatomy‐based image guidance, CBCT dose can be reduced to a value similar to that of a kV image pair with similar or better patient positioning accuracy than kV image pair alignment. Where rotations are important to correct, CBCT will be superior to orthogonal kV imaging without significantly increased imaging dose. This is especially important for image guidance for pediatric patient treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78821012021-02-19 How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study Olch, Arthur J. Alaei, Parham J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is often used for patient setup based solely on bony anatomy. The goal of this work was to evaluate whether CBCT dose can be lowered to the level of kV image pair doses when used for bony anatomy‐based IGRT without compromising positioning accuracy. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was CT scanned in the head, head and neck, chest, and pelvis regions and setup on the linear accelerator couch with the isocenter near the planned location. Cone beam computed tomographies were performed with the standard “full dose” protocol supplied by the linac vendor. With sequentially lowering the dose, three‐dimensional (3D) matching was performed for each without shifting the couch. The standard kV image pair protocol for each site was also used to image the phantoms. For all studies, six degrees of freedom was included in the 2D or 3D matching to the extent they could be employed. Imaging doses were determined in air at isocenter following the TG‐61 formalism. RESULTS: Cone beam computed tomography dose was reduced by 81–98% of the standard CBCT protocol to nearly that of the standard kV image pair dose for each site. Relative to the standard CBCT shift values, translational shifts were within 0.3 and 1.6 mm for all sites, for the reduced dose CBCT and kV image pair, respectively. Rotational shifts were within 0.2 degree and 0.7 degrees for all sites, for the reduced dose CBCTs and kV image pair, respectively. CONCLUSION: For bony anatomy‐based image guidance, CBCT dose can be reduced to a value similar to that of a kV image pair with similar or better patient positioning accuracy than kV image pair alignment. Where rotations are important to correct, CBCT will be superior to orthogonal kV imaging without significantly increased imaging dose. This is especially important for image guidance for pediatric patient treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7882101/ /pubmed/33450139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13164 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Olch, Arthur J.
Alaei, Parham
How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study
title How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study
title_full How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study
title_fullStr How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study
title_full_unstemmed How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study
title_short How low can you go? A CBCT dose reduction study
title_sort how low can you go? a cbct dose reduction study
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33450139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13164
work_keys_str_mv AT olcharthurj howlowcanyougoacbctdosereductionstudy
AT alaeiparham howlowcanyougoacbctdosereductionstudy