Cargando…

How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough

BACKGROUND: Acquired brain injury affects many brain areas and causes a range of dysfunctions including vision‐related issues. These issues can have negative impacts on rehabilitation progress and activities of daily life but may easily be overlooked. There is no common recommendation about how to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berthold‐Lindstedt, Märta, Johansson, Jan, Ygge, Jan, Borg, Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33230981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1958
_version_ 1783651003762999296
author Berthold‐Lindstedt, Märta
Johansson, Jan
Ygge, Jan
Borg, Kristian
author_facet Berthold‐Lindstedt, Märta
Johansson, Jan
Ygge, Jan
Borg, Kristian
author_sort Berthold‐Lindstedt, Märta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acquired brain injury affects many brain areas and causes a range of dysfunctions including vision‐related issues. These issues can have negative impacts on rehabilitation progress and activities of daily life but may easily be overlooked. There is no common recommendation about how to assess visual impairments after ABI. The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of objectively measures oculomotor dysfunctions, and also how these findings are related to two inventories intended to support detection of visual impairment. METHODS: The study was cross‐sectional and included 73 outpatients. In addition to the standard evaluation program, the patients went through a comprehensive optometric examination. The inventories used were the Vision Interview (VI) and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). RESULTS: All three types of examinations showed a high proportion vision‐related symptoms. Fusion vergence was the most common objectively measured finding, 83%. There were seven statistically significant associations between five VI items and five visual deficits. The strength of associations was moderate (Phi 0.261–0.487, p < .05). The sensitivity and specificity of the CISS were moderate. CONCLUSION: We found high percentages of the patients with visual symptoms and dysfunctions. Due to the complexity of visual symptoms and functional deficits in ABI, we find it necessary to combine both symptom assessment and vision examination in order to capture visual function issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78821542021-02-19 How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough Berthold‐Lindstedt, Märta Johansson, Jan Ygge, Jan Borg, Kristian Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: Acquired brain injury affects many brain areas and causes a range of dysfunctions including vision‐related issues. These issues can have negative impacts on rehabilitation progress and activities of daily life but may easily be overlooked. There is no common recommendation about how to assess visual impairments after ABI. The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of objectively measures oculomotor dysfunctions, and also how these findings are related to two inventories intended to support detection of visual impairment. METHODS: The study was cross‐sectional and included 73 outpatients. In addition to the standard evaluation program, the patients went through a comprehensive optometric examination. The inventories used were the Vision Interview (VI) and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). RESULTS: All three types of examinations showed a high proportion vision‐related symptoms. Fusion vergence was the most common objectively measured finding, 83%. There were seven statistically significant associations between five VI items and five visual deficits. The strength of associations was moderate (Phi 0.261–0.487, p < .05). The sensitivity and specificity of the CISS were moderate. CONCLUSION: We found high percentages of the patients with visual symptoms and dysfunctions. Due to the complexity of visual symptoms and functional deficits in ABI, we find it necessary to combine both symptom assessment and vision examination in order to capture visual function issues. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7882154/ /pubmed/33230981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1958 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Berthold‐Lindstedt, Märta
Johansson, Jan
Ygge, Jan
Borg, Kristian
How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough
title How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough
title_full How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough
title_fullStr How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough
title_full_unstemmed How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough
title_short How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—Asking is not enough
title_sort how to assess visual function in acquired brain injury—asking is not enough
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33230981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1958
work_keys_str_mv AT bertholdlindstedtmarta howtoassessvisualfunctioninacquiredbraininjuryaskingisnotenough
AT johanssonjan howtoassessvisualfunctioninacquiredbraininjuryaskingisnotenough
AT yggejan howtoassessvisualfunctioninacquiredbraininjuryaskingisnotenough
AT borgkristian howtoassessvisualfunctioninacquiredbraininjuryaskingisnotenough