Cargando…

The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic memories of events such as a life‐threatening incident, serious injury, or sexual violence are a core symptom of stress‐related disorders; they might be susceptible to positive modification with interference tasks (reconsolidation‐based interventions). Our objective was to te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales‐Rivero, Alonso, Reyes‐Santos, Lorena, Bisanz, Erik, Ruiz‐Chow, Angel, Crail‐Melendez, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1984
_version_ 1783651007486492672
author Morales‐Rivero, Alonso
Reyes‐Santos, Lorena
Bisanz, Erik
Ruiz‐Chow, Angel
Crail‐Melendez, Daniel
author_facet Morales‐Rivero, Alonso
Reyes‐Santos, Lorena
Bisanz, Erik
Ruiz‐Chow, Angel
Crail‐Melendez, Daniel
author_sort Morales‐Rivero, Alonso
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Traumatic memories of events such as a life‐threatening incident, serious injury, or sexual violence are a core symptom of stress‐related disorders; they might be susceptible to positive modification with interference tasks (reconsolidation‐based interventions). Our objective was to test the effect of performing a motor interference task (finger tapping in response to audio cues) on patients who suffer from traumatic memories. METHODS: We designed an uncontrolled pilot prospective clinical trial. Ten participants listened to an audio track that instructed them to tap their fingers in response to specific audio cues while trying to recall the traumatic event. Each patient underwent an assessment including the Spanish version of the PTSD Symptom Severity Scale‐Revised (EGS‐R), the visual analogue scale (EQ‐VAS) from EuroQol 5D (EQ‐5D), and a simple visual analogue scale (VAS) before the intervention, immediately after, and a week after the treatment. RESULTS: All measures exhibited a statistically significant improvement 1 week after the study. On the PTSD scale, 1 week later, 30% of the patients did not score high enough for such diagnosis. The VAS measured immediately following the intervention (4.4, SD = 2.22) also improved (p < .001), and 30% of the patients scored zero. One week after the intervention, the VAS improved more than 50% CONCLUSION: The rapid 1‐week improvement on the PSTD scale and the VAS after a 30 min intervention support the idea of further research using a double‐blind, controlled design powered to demonstrate the efficacy of motor interference, an easy‐to‐apply therapeutic tool, in the treatment of traumatic memories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78821702021-02-19 The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study Morales‐Rivero, Alonso Reyes‐Santos, Lorena Bisanz, Erik Ruiz‐Chow, Angel Crail‐Melendez, Daniel Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Traumatic memories of events such as a life‐threatening incident, serious injury, or sexual violence are a core symptom of stress‐related disorders; they might be susceptible to positive modification with interference tasks (reconsolidation‐based interventions). Our objective was to test the effect of performing a motor interference task (finger tapping in response to audio cues) on patients who suffer from traumatic memories. METHODS: We designed an uncontrolled pilot prospective clinical trial. Ten participants listened to an audio track that instructed them to tap their fingers in response to specific audio cues while trying to recall the traumatic event. Each patient underwent an assessment including the Spanish version of the PTSD Symptom Severity Scale‐Revised (EGS‐R), the visual analogue scale (EQ‐VAS) from EuroQol 5D (EQ‐5D), and a simple visual analogue scale (VAS) before the intervention, immediately after, and a week after the treatment. RESULTS: All measures exhibited a statistically significant improvement 1 week after the study. On the PTSD scale, 1 week later, 30% of the patients did not score high enough for such diagnosis. The VAS measured immediately following the intervention (4.4, SD = 2.22) also improved (p < .001), and 30% of the patients scored zero. One week after the intervention, the VAS improved more than 50% CONCLUSION: The rapid 1‐week improvement on the PSTD scale and the VAS after a 30 min intervention support the idea of further research using a double‐blind, controlled design powered to demonstrate the efficacy of motor interference, an easy‐to‐apply therapeutic tool, in the treatment of traumatic memories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7882170/ /pubmed/33314729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1984 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Morales‐Rivero, Alonso
Reyes‐Santos, Lorena
Bisanz, Erik
Ruiz‐Chow, Angel
Crail‐Melendez, Daniel
The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study
title The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study
title_full The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study
title_fullStr The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study
title_short The effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: A pilot study
title_sort effect of motor interference therapy in traumatic memories: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1984
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesriveroalonso theeffectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT reyessantoslorena theeffectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT bisanzerik theeffectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT ruizchowangel theeffectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT crailmelendezdaniel theeffectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT moralesriveroalonso effectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT reyessantoslorena effectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT bisanzerik effectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT ruizchowangel effectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy
AT crailmelendezdaniel effectofmotorinterferencetherapyintraumaticmemoriesapilotstudy