Cargando…

Self‐administered biofeedback treatment app for pediatric migraine: A randomized pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect size, safety, and tolerability of a therapist‐independent biofeedback treatment app among adolescent with migraine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, 3:1 ratio randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blind, pilot study with 16 adolescents diagnosed with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stubberud, Anker, Linde, Mattias, Brenner, Eiliv, Heier, Martin, Olsen, Alexander, Aamodt, Anne Hege, Gravdahl, Gøril B., Tronvik, Erling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882181/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1974
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect size, safety, and tolerability of a therapist‐independent biofeedback treatment app among adolescent with migraine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, 3:1 ratio randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blind, pilot study with 16 adolescents diagnosed with migraine randomized to eight weeks of biofeedback treatment (n = 12) or sham biofeedback (n = 4), carried out at two university hospitals in Norway. The prespecified and primary objective of the study was to observe changes in outcomes within the active treatment group. The sham control group was included in a minor ratio primarily to evaluate its feasibility. The primary outcome was change in headache frequency. A modified intention to treat analysis was performed, including participants completing at least seven biofeedback sessions in weeks 1–4 (n = 12 vs. n = 4) and weeks 5–8 (n = 7 vs. n = 2). RESULTS: Adherence was poor with 40% (136/336) of planned biofeedback sessions completed during weeks 5–8. Within the biofeedback group, a not statistically significant reduction in headache frequency was observed at weeks 1–4 (2.92 days/month, 95% CI −1.00 to 6.84, p = .145) and weeks 5–8 (1.85 days/month, 95% CI −2.01 to 5.72, p = .395). The biofeedback group experienced a median of one fewer headache days/month versus sham that did not reach significance (95% CI −4.0 to 9.0, p = .760). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a small reduction in headache frequency in the active treatment group. Findings were likely undermined by low adherence and underpowered analyses but indicate that a therapist‐independent biofeedback treatment app has the potential to be an effective, tolerable, and inexpensive treatment option.