Cargando…
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized g...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615303 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965 |
_version_ | 1783651014334742528 |
---|---|
author | Rokn, Amirreza Zare, Hadi Haddadi, Pardis |
author_facet | Rokn, Amirreza Zare, Hadi Haddadi, Pardis |
author_sort | Rokn, Amirreza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. RESULTS: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. CONCLUSION: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7882206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78822062021-02-19 Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Rokn, Amirreza Zare, Hadi Haddadi, Pardis Front Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. RESULTS: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. CONCLUSION: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7882206/ /pubmed/33615303 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rokn, Amirreza Zare, Hadi Haddadi, Pardis Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title | Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full | Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_short | Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_sort | use of mucograft collagen matrix(®) versus free gingival graft to augment keratinized tissue around teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615303 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roknamirreza useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT zarehadi useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT haddadipardis useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |