Cargando…

Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rokn, Amirreza, Zare, Hadi, Haddadi, Pardis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615303
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965
_version_ 1783651014334742528
author Rokn, Amirreza
Zare, Hadi
Haddadi, Pardis
author_facet Rokn, Amirreza
Zare, Hadi
Haddadi, Pardis
author_sort Rokn, Amirreza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. RESULTS: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. CONCLUSION: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78822062021-02-19 Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Rokn, Amirreza Zare, Hadi Haddadi, Pardis Front Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. RESULTS: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. CONCLUSION: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7882206/ /pubmed/33615303 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license, (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rokn, Amirreza
Zare, Hadi
Haddadi, Pardis
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix(®) versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort use of mucograft collagen matrix(®) versus free gingival graft to augment keratinized tissue around teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33615303
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v17i1.3965
work_keys_str_mv AT roknamirreza useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT zarehadi useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT haddadipardis useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial