Cargando…
Diagnosis and etiological identification in severe constrictive pericarditis in a 14-year-old girl: a case report
Constrictive pericarditis in children is exceedingly rare, and may cause very problematic confusion of diagnosis and etiology identification. In this case, we examined a 14-year-old female patient who had developed signs of significant anasarca which was eventually turned out to be constrictive peri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633955 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-203 |
Sumario: | Constrictive pericarditis in children is exceedingly rare, and may cause very problematic confusion of diagnosis and etiology identification. In this case, we examined a 14-year-old female patient who had developed signs of significant anasarca which was eventually turned out to be constrictive pericarditis. Affected by the experience of examiners, the patient was not diagnosed or even suspected with constrictive pericarditis when she was initially examined by echocardiography in the hospital where she visited before. Reexamination of echocardiography, cardiac catheterization and non-invasive image techniques were performed to establish the diagnosis finally. Open pericardectomy was ultimately performed and normal hemodynamic parameters and cardiac function were obtained postoperatively. In the determination of etiology, we inferred that chronic infection induced by local virus infection in the pericardium led to constrictive pericarditis. Parvovirus B19 (PVB19) and/or human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) were the two most likely viruses involved based on published literature reviews. Importantly, we learned that serological antibody testing may be false-negative and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pericardial viral nucleic acid testing may be the gold standard for confirmation. Unfortunately, fresh pericardial tissue samples were not taken before paraformaldehyde fixation in our case, which made it impossible for us to detect suspicious viruses. We do hope that the lessons learned from this case will be helpful and instructive for the etiological diagnosis of similar patients in the future. |
---|