Cargando…

Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy

PURPOSE: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is a common cancer that in most cases is curable with surgery. About 3–5% of patients develop advanced CSCC (aCSCC) and are no longer responsive to surgery or radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-util...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghetti, Gianni, D’Avella, Maria Claudia, Pradelli, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603419
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S295605
_version_ 1783651043300605952
author Ghetti, Gianni
D’Avella, Maria Claudia
Pradelli, Lorenzo
author_facet Ghetti, Gianni
D’Avella, Maria Claudia
Pradelli, Lorenzo
author_sort Ghetti, Gianni
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is a common cancer that in most cases is curable with surgery. About 3–5% of patients develop advanced CSCC (aCSCC) and are no longer responsive to surgery or radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cemiplimab, the first systemic therapy approved in Italy for patients with aCSCC, vs platinum-based chemotherapy from the Italian National Health Service (SSN) perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model, which included three mutually exclusive health states, was developed to estimate costs and outcomes for patients with aCSCC, over a 30-year time horizon (lifetime). No direct evidence of the comparative efficacy and safety of cemiplimab versus other therapies currently exists. Therefore, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of cemiplimab versus chemotherapy. Individual patient data for cemiplimab were collected from the EMPOWER-CSCC 1 trial whereas chemotherapy data were derived from a retrospective study. In the STC a regression model was used to predict outcomes for cemiplimab in the population observed in the comparator study. Costs of drug acquisition/administration and management of adverse events were included. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were calculated; sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: In the base-case, treatment with cemiplimab was associated with a gain of 4.89 LYs and 3.99 QALYs, compared with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, resulting in an estimated ICER of 27,821 €/LY gained and an ICUR of 34,110 €/QALY gained. Both ICER and ICUR were below the commonly used Italian SSN willingness to pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: The use of cemiplimab, compared with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, can be considered a cost-effective option for the treatment of aCSCC patients in Italy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78824232021-02-17 Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy Ghetti, Gianni D’Avella, Maria Claudia Pradelli, Lorenzo Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research PURPOSE: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is a common cancer that in most cases is curable with surgery. About 3–5% of patients develop advanced CSCC (aCSCC) and are no longer responsive to surgery or radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cemiplimab, the first systemic therapy approved in Italy for patients with aCSCC, vs platinum-based chemotherapy from the Italian National Health Service (SSN) perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model, which included three mutually exclusive health states, was developed to estimate costs and outcomes for patients with aCSCC, over a 30-year time horizon (lifetime). No direct evidence of the comparative efficacy and safety of cemiplimab versus other therapies currently exists. Therefore, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of cemiplimab versus chemotherapy. Individual patient data for cemiplimab were collected from the EMPOWER-CSCC 1 trial whereas chemotherapy data were derived from a retrospective study. In the STC a regression model was used to predict outcomes for cemiplimab in the population observed in the comparator study. Costs of drug acquisition/administration and management of adverse events were included. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were calculated; sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. RESULTS: In the base-case, treatment with cemiplimab was associated with a gain of 4.89 LYs and 3.99 QALYs, compared with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, resulting in an estimated ICER of 27,821 €/LY gained and an ICUR of 34,110 €/QALY gained. Both ICER and ICUR were below the commonly used Italian SSN willingness to pay thresholds. CONCLUSION: The use of cemiplimab, compared with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, can be considered a cost-effective option for the treatment of aCSCC patients in Italy. Dove 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7882423/ /pubmed/33603419 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S295605 Text en © 2021 Ghetti et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ghetti, Gianni
D’Avella, Maria Claudia
Pradelli, Lorenzo
Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy
title Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy
title_full Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy
title_fullStr Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy
title_short Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of Cemiplimab in Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Italy
title_sort preliminary cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in italy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33603419
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S295605
work_keys_str_mv AT ghettigianni preliminarycosteffectivenessandcostutilityanalysisofcemiplimabinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomainitaly
AT davellamariaclaudia preliminarycosteffectivenessandcostutilityanalysisofcemiplimabinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomainitaly
AT pradellilorenzo preliminarycosteffectivenessandcostutilityanalysisofcemiplimabinpatientswithadvancedcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinomainitaly