Cargando…

Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, database review. OBJECTIVES: Examine the utilization rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and compare the incidence and severity of bleeding and thrombotic complications in elective spine surgery patients. METHODS: We utilized PearlDiver, a nation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirkle, Sean, Cook, David J., Kaskovich, Samuel, Bhattacharjee, Sarah, Ho, Alisha, Shi, Lewis L., Lee, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219896295
_version_ 1783651127578853376
author Pirkle, Sean
Cook, David J.
Kaskovich, Samuel
Bhattacharjee, Sarah
Ho, Alisha
Shi, Lewis L.
Lee, Michael J.
author_facet Pirkle, Sean
Cook, David J.
Kaskovich, Samuel
Bhattacharjee, Sarah
Ho, Alisha
Shi, Lewis L.
Lee, Michael J.
author_sort Pirkle, Sean
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, database review. OBJECTIVES: Examine the utilization rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and compare the incidence and severity of bleeding and thrombotic complications in elective spine surgery patients. METHODS: We utilized PearlDiver, a national orthopedics claims database. All patients who underwent elective spine surgery from 2007 to 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by the presence of DVT prophylaxis drug codes, then by comorbidities for postoperative bleeding/thrombosis. The severity of all bleeding and thrombotic complications in each cohort was studied, including the incidence of complications requiring operative washout, diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 119 888 patients were included. The majority of patients (118 720, >99%) were not administered postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis while a minority of patients (1168) were. The overall rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications within the population not receiving DVT prophylaxis were 1.96% and 2.45%, respectively (P < .001). The incidence of surgical intervention for a wound washout was 0.62% compared with 1.05% for pulmonary embolism (P < .001). Intensive care unit admission rates related to a wound washout procedure or pulmonary embolism also significantly differed (0.07% vs 0.34%, P < .001). There were no observed differences in mortality. When controlling for patient comorbidity, patients with atrial fibrillation, cancer, or a prior history of thrombotic complications experienced the greatest increased risks of postoperative thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: DVT prophylaxis is not routinely utilized following elective spine procedures. We report that there exist specific populations which may receive benefit from these practices, although further study is necessary to determine optimal prevention strategies for both thrombotic and bleeding complications in spine surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7882830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78828302021-02-23 Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients Pirkle, Sean Cook, David J. Kaskovich, Samuel Bhattacharjee, Sarah Ho, Alisha Shi, Lewis L. Lee, Michael J. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, database review. OBJECTIVES: Examine the utilization rate of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and compare the incidence and severity of bleeding and thrombotic complications in elective spine surgery patients. METHODS: We utilized PearlDiver, a national orthopedics claims database. All patients who underwent elective spine surgery from 2007 to 2017 were included. Patients were stratified by the presence of DVT prophylaxis drug codes, then by comorbidities for postoperative bleeding/thrombosis. The severity of all bleeding and thrombotic complications in each cohort was studied, including the incidence of complications requiring operative washout, diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, intensive care unit admission, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 119 888 patients were included. The majority of patients (118 720, >99%) were not administered postoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis while a minority of patients (1168) were. The overall rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications within the population not receiving DVT prophylaxis were 1.96% and 2.45%, respectively (P < .001). The incidence of surgical intervention for a wound washout was 0.62% compared with 1.05% for pulmonary embolism (P < .001). Intensive care unit admission rates related to a wound washout procedure or pulmonary embolism also significantly differed (0.07% vs 0.34%, P < .001). There were no observed differences in mortality. When controlling for patient comorbidity, patients with atrial fibrillation, cancer, or a prior history of thrombotic complications experienced the greatest increased risks of postoperative thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: DVT prophylaxis is not routinely utilized following elective spine procedures. We report that there exist specific populations which may receive benefit from these practices, although further study is necessary to determine optimal prevention strategies for both thrombotic and bleeding complications in spine surgery. SAGE Publications 2019-12-26 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7882830/ /pubmed/32875853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219896295 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pirkle, Sean
Cook, David J.
Kaskovich, Samuel
Bhattacharjee, Sarah
Ho, Alisha
Shi, Lewis L.
Lee, Michael J.
Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients
title Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients
title_full Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients
title_fullStr Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients
title_short Comparing Bleeding and Thrombotic Rates in Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 119 888 Patients
title_sort comparing bleeding and thrombotic rates in spine surgery: an analysis of 119 888 patients
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7882830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32875853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219896295
work_keys_str_mv AT pirklesean comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients
AT cookdavidj comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients
AT kaskovichsamuel comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients
AT bhattacharjeesarah comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients
AT hoalisha comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients
AT shilewisl comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients
AT leemichaelj comparingbleedingandthromboticratesinspinesurgeryananalysisof119888patients