Cargando…
Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources
BACKGROUND: The Australasian Integrative Medicine Association (AIMA) established a working group to develop the AIMA Guiding Principles for Letter Writing and Letter Writing Templates. The guiding principles were developed to promote effective communication between the diverse range of healthcare pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121992338 |
_version_ | 1783651179778015232 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Janet Hunter, Jennifer Smith, Lorraine Forth, Amy Tyler, Amy Furney, Louise Ee, Carolyn Harnett, Joanna E |
author_facet | Nguyen, Janet Hunter, Jennifer Smith, Lorraine Forth, Amy Tyler, Amy Furney, Louise Ee, Carolyn Harnett, Joanna E |
author_sort | Nguyen, Janet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Australasian Integrative Medicine Association (AIMA) established a working group to develop the AIMA Guiding Principles for Letter Writing and Letter Writing Templates. The guiding principles were developed to promote effective communication between the diverse range of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) that patients choose to consult. Following the development of the Interprofessional Communication (IPC) resources, AIMA undertook a public consultation as part of a quality assurance process to evaluate the relevance and utility of the resource. AIM: This study reports stakeholder feedback on AIMA’s draft guiding principles document. It explores stakeholder attitudes towards IPC and HCPs letter-writing, and interest in ongoing continuing professional development (CPD). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey involving 1) an online public consultation survey and 2) a paper survey collected following IPC CPD activities. Quantitative data were analysed using Chi square and Fisher-Freeman-Halton Test. Responses to open ended questions were coded and subject to a thematic analysis. RESULTS: The 64 survey participants and 55 CPD participants represented the Australian healthcare sectors and lay community. Most thought IPC is important (n = 112/117; 96%) and the resources were informative (n = 112/119; 94%), understandable (n = 111/119; 93%), and clinically relevant (n = 105/117; 90%). HCP reported wide variations in their frequency of correspondence with other practitioner types, with rates often concerningly low. Key IPC themes identified were the importance of continuity of care, clarity of communication, and professional practice. CPD participants were most interested in further IPC training (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IPC resources affirm the role of formal communication pathways, such as letters of correspondence to support coordinated, patient-centred and multidisciplinary care. Challenges with letter writing and IPC signal the need for more student and professional education on the subject to promote continuity of patient care and the delivery of high quality, integrative medicine and health care services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7883148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78831482021-02-23 Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources Nguyen, Janet Hunter, Jennifer Smith, Lorraine Forth, Amy Tyler, Amy Furney, Louise Ee, Carolyn Harnett, Joanna E Glob Adv Health Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The Australasian Integrative Medicine Association (AIMA) established a working group to develop the AIMA Guiding Principles for Letter Writing and Letter Writing Templates. The guiding principles were developed to promote effective communication between the diverse range of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) that patients choose to consult. Following the development of the Interprofessional Communication (IPC) resources, AIMA undertook a public consultation as part of a quality assurance process to evaluate the relevance and utility of the resource. AIM: This study reports stakeholder feedback on AIMA’s draft guiding principles document. It explores stakeholder attitudes towards IPC and HCPs letter-writing, and interest in ongoing continuing professional development (CPD). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey involving 1) an online public consultation survey and 2) a paper survey collected following IPC CPD activities. Quantitative data were analysed using Chi square and Fisher-Freeman-Halton Test. Responses to open ended questions were coded and subject to a thematic analysis. RESULTS: The 64 survey participants and 55 CPD participants represented the Australian healthcare sectors and lay community. Most thought IPC is important (n = 112/117; 96%) and the resources were informative (n = 112/119; 94%), understandable (n = 111/119; 93%), and clinically relevant (n = 105/117; 90%). HCP reported wide variations in their frequency of correspondence with other practitioner types, with rates often concerningly low. Key IPC themes identified were the importance of continuity of care, clarity of communication, and professional practice. CPD participants were most interested in further IPC training (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The IPC resources affirm the role of formal communication pathways, such as letters of correspondence to support coordinated, patient-centred and multidisciplinary care. Challenges with letter writing and IPC signal the need for more student and professional education on the subject to promote continuity of patient care and the delivery of high quality, integrative medicine and health care services. SAGE Publications 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7883148/ /pubmed/33628627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121992338 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nguyen, Janet Hunter, Jennifer Smith, Lorraine Forth, Amy Tyler, Amy Furney, Louise Ee, Carolyn Harnett, Joanna E Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources |
title | Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources |
title_full | Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources |
title_fullStr | Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources |
title_full_unstemmed | Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources |
title_short | Can We All Speak the Same ‘Language’ for Our Patients’ Sake? Feedback on Interprofessional Communication and Related Resources |
title_sort | can we all speak the same ‘language’ for our patients’ sake? feedback on interprofessional communication and related resources |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33628627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956121992338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenjanet canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT hunterjennifer canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT smithlorraine canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT forthamy canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT tyleramy canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT furneylouise canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT eecarolyn canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT harnettjoannae canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources AT canweallspeakthesamelanguageforourpatientssakefeedbackoninterprofessionalcommunicationandrelatedresources |