Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention

BACKGROUND: The cariostatic action associated with fluoride-releasing restorative materials is mainly attributed to a sustained release of fluoride. This research aims on comparing Cention N and Zirconomer Improved in vitro fluoride release and re-release. METHODS: Test materials were grouped into t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul, Saurav, Raina, Aakrati, Kour, Simran, Mishra, Swati, Bansal, Mukta, Sengupta, Arijit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623244
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_222_20
_version_ 1783651280812507136
author Paul, Saurav
Raina, Aakrati
Kour, Simran
Mishra, Swati
Bansal, Mukta
Sengupta, Arijit
author_facet Paul, Saurav
Raina, Aakrati
Kour, Simran
Mishra, Swati
Bansal, Mukta
Sengupta, Arijit
author_sort Paul, Saurav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cariostatic action associated with fluoride-releasing restorative materials is mainly attributed to a sustained release of fluoride. This research aims on comparing Cention N and Zirconomer Improved in vitro fluoride release and re-release. METHODS: Test materials were grouped into two categories containing 15 samples each. The cumulative fluoride release and re-release measurements was made during 1st, 7th and 15th day. The independent sample t-test and paired t-test was used to check mean differences. The level of significance was kept at p<0.05. RESULTS: At day 1, 7 and 15 the initial fluoride release of zirconomer group was significantly higher (p<0.05) than the cention group. It was found that from day 1 to day 7 the mean initial fluoride release has significantly reduced (p<0.05) for both the groups. Similar results were also seen when comparisons were done between day 7 to day 15 (p<0.05) and day 1 to day 15 (p<0.05) for both the groups. CONCLUSION: Zirconomer was more efficient in initial and fluoride re-release than the Cention N restorative material. Further in vivo studies with more parameters are recommended to evaluate fluoride release and cariostatic performance of Cention N and Zirconomer in real environmental circumstances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7883777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78837772021-02-22 Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention Paul, Saurav Raina, Aakrati Kour, Simran Mishra, Swati Bansal, Mukta Sengupta, Arijit J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The cariostatic action associated with fluoride-releasing restorative materials is mainly attributed to a sustained release of fluoride. This research aims on comparing Cention N and Zirconomer Improved in vitro fluoride release and re-release. METHODS: Test materials were grouped into two categories containing 15 samples each. The cumulative fluoride release and re-release measurements was made during 1st, 7th and 15th day. The independent sample t-test and paired t-test was used to check mean differences. The level of significance was kept at p<0.05. RESULTS: At day 1, 7 and 15 the initial fluoride release of zirconomer group was significantly higher (p<0.05) than the cention group. It was found that from day 1 to day 7 the mean initial fluoride release has significantly reduced (p<0.05) for both the groups. Similar results were also seen when comparisons were done between day 7 to day 15 (p<0.05) and day 1 to day 15 (p<0.05) for both the groups. CONCLUSION: Zirconomer was more efficient in initial and fluoride re-release than the Cention N restorative material. Further in vivo studies with more parameters are recommended to evaluate fluoride release and cariostatic performance of Cention N and Zirconomer in real environmental circumstances. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7883777/ /pubmed/33623244 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_222_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paul, Saurav
Raina, Aakrati
Kour, Simran
Mishra, Swati
Bansal, Mukta
Sengupta, Arijit
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention
title Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention
title_full Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention
title_short Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention
title_sort comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of zirconomer improved and cention
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623244
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_222_20
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsaurav comparativeevaluationoffluoridereleaseandrereleaseandrechargepotentialofzirconomerimprovedandcention
AT rainaaakrati comparativeevaluationoffluoridereleaseandrereleaseandrechargepotentialofzirconomerimprovedandcention
AT koursimran comparativeevaluationoffluoridereleaseandrereleaseandrechargepotentialofzirconomerimprovedandcention
AT mishraswati comparativeevaluationoffluoridereleaseandrereleaseandrechargepotentialofzirconomerimprovedandcention
AT bansalmukta comparativeevaluationoffluoridereleaseandrereleaseandrechargepotentialofzirconomerimprovedandcention
AT senguptaarijit comparativeevaluationoffluoridereleaseandrereleaseandrechargepotentialofzirconomerimprovedandcention