Cargando…
Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study
INTRODUCTION: Two important aspects of the dental operating microscope (DOM) that factor into its overall effectiveness are resolution and depth of field. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the resolution and depth of field of DOMs from three well-known manufacturers...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_191_20 |
_version_ | 1783651284347256832 |
---|---|
author | Jalali, Poorya Kim, Charles Woodmansey, Karl F. |
author_facet | Jalali, Poorya Kim, Charles Woodmansey, Karl F. |
author_sort | Jalali, Poorya |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Two important aspects of the dental operating microscope (DOM) that factor into its overall effectiveness are resolution and depth of field. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the resolution and depth of field of DOMs from three well-known manufacturers using standardized test targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A resolution test, using the 1951 USAF Hi-Resolution Target (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ), and a depth of field test, using the Depth of Field Target 5-15 (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ), were performed by two calibrated observers. Three DOM systems such as Seiler IQ (Seiler Instrument Inc., St. Louis, USA), Global G-Series 6 step (Global Surgical Corp., St. Louis, USA), and Zeiss Extaro 300 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany) were used to compare the resolution and depth of field. RESULTS: The Zeiss Extaro 300 showed the highest maximum resolution and maximum DOF (64 lp/mm and 17mm, respectively). The Seiler IQ showed the lowest maximum resolution and maximum DOF (35.9 lp/mm and 11 mm, respectively). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the Zeiss Extaro 300 was superior in terms of resolution and depth of field as compared to the other two DOMs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7883792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78837922021-02-22 Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study Jalali, Poorya Kim, Charles Woodmansey, Karl F. J Conserv Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Two important aspects of the dental operating microscope (DOM) that factor into its overall effectiveness are resolution and depth of field. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the resolution and depth of field of DOMs from three well-known manufacturers using standardized test targets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A resolution test, using the 1951 USAF Hi-Resolution Target (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ), and a depth of field test, using the Depth of Field Target 5-15 (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ), were performed by two calibrated observers. Three DOM systems such as Seiler IQ (Seiler Instrument Inc., St. Louis, USA), Global G-Series 6 step (Global Surgical Corp., St. Louis, USA), and Zeiss Extaro 300 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany) were used to compare the resolution and depth of field. RESULTS: The Zeiss Extaro 300 showed the highest maximum resolution and maximum DOF (64 lp/mm and 17mm, respectively). The Seiler IQ showed the lowest maximum resolution and maximum DOF (35.9 lp/mm and 11 mm, respectively). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the Zeiss Extaro 300 was superior in terms of resolution and depth of field as compared to the other two DOMs. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2021-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7883792/ /pubmed/33623239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_191_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jalali, Poorya Kim, Charles Woodmansey, Karl F. Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study |
title | Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study |
title_full | Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study |
title_short | Comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: A pilot study |
title_sort | comparison of optical performance among three dental operating microscopes: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33623239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_191_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jalalipoorya comparisonofopticalperformanceamongthreedentaloperatingmicroscopesapilotstudy AT kimcharles comparisonofopticalperformanceamongthreedentaloperatingmicroscopesapilotstudy AT woodmanseykarlf comparisonofopticalperformanceamongthreedentaloperatingmicroscopesapilotstudy |